Gender issues, particularly in relation to women’s status and rights, occupy a prominent place in debates about aid and development. Law is often perceived to play a crucial role in shaping men’s and women’s social, economic and political opportunities, but also in the ways we conceive of gender in the first place (including the binary construction ‘men/women’).

This course explores the relationship between gender, law and development in historical and comparative perspective. It introduces a range of conceptual frameworks, which are explored through an examination of prominent aid and development issues, such as: 

• Rights to land; natural resources;
• Climate change;
• Employment and labour;
• Food production, distribution and consumption.

These thematic areas provide an opportunity for students to critically examine the presumed and actual relationship between international and domestic legal frameworks and gender inequality, as well as consider debates about the role and recognition of customary laws and institutions. Particular attention will be paid to the insights of postcolonial feminists and critical race theorists and the work of women of colour. The course will also centre questions of conflict and ideological diversity when it comes to gender, law and development and encourage the students to think critically about these three concepts and their intersection.

This unit draws on the extensive scholarly and applied expertise in gender and development at the ANU and is designed to encourage student engagement and participation. 

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

1. Critically analyse and evaluate conceptual and theoretical debates regarding the relationship between law, gender and development;
2. Investigate and review debates about law and gender relations in the histories and social landscapes of particular countries;
3. Identify and critically analyse the conceptual underpinnings of a development project or policy and consider its likely gender impacts;
4. Critically reflect on their own experiences of gender and development and the conceptual underpinnings of their own assumptions, approaches and methods; and
5. Plan and execute a complex legal research project and produce original scholarship on gender relations, law and development. 

Research-Led Teaching

The course convenor, Professor Rebecca Monson has led the development of law, governance and development teaching in the ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy and has extensive experience working on questions of social inequality, legal and institutional pluralism, and development, particularly in the Pacific region. Rebecca regularly works in collaborative teams providing technical assistance and advice to governments, non-government organisations and development institutions. Prior to joining the ANU, Rebecca worked as a lawyer specialising in emergency and disaster law. 

This course is research-led, with course content drawing on the specialist research interests of the convenor and guest lecturers. The names and brief biographies of guest lecturers will be posted on Canvas as they are finalised.

Rebecca’s approach to teaching is influenced by Teresia Teaiwa’s concept of the classroom as a metaphorical canoe, in which the teacher is chief navigator and everyone is on a shared learning journey (see Teaiwa 2005). The course is highly interactive, with a range of discussions and activities that emphasise inquiry-based learning, self-reflection, reciprocity and respect. The class will cover current debates and programs addressing the intersection of gender, law and development, and will also consider the processes by which knowledge about people, legal systems and places is produced. The Assessment tasks have been designed to enable and require students to develop and demonstrate these skills.

Required Resources

There is no prescribed textbook for this course. Readings will be made available on Canvas two weeks prior to the course commencement date.

Recommended Resources

Whether you are on campus or studying online, there are a variety of online platforms you will use to participate in your study program. These could include videos for lectures and other instruction, two-way video conferencing for interactive learning, email and other messaging tools for communication, interactive web apps for formative and collaborative activities, print and/or photo/scan for handwritten work and drawings, and home-based assessment.

ANU outlines recommended student system requirements to ensure you are able to participate fully in your learning. Other information is also available about the various Learning Platforms you may use.

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

• written comments
• verbal comments
• feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.

Other Information

Task submission times refer to Canberra time (AEST/AEDT).

Extensions, late submission and penalties: https://law.anu.edu.au/extensions-late-submission-and-penalties

Extenuating circumstances: https://www.anu.edu.au/students/program-administration/assessments-exams/extenuating-circumstances-application

Deferred examination: http://www.anu.edu.au/students/program-administration/assessments-exams/deferred-examinations

Penalties for excess word length: https://law.anu.edu.au/word-length-and-excess-word-penalties

Distribution of grades policy: https://law.anu.edu.au/grading

Assessment Reviews and Appeals: https://law.anu.edu.au/assessment-review-and-appeals

Further information about the course is available from the course Canvas page. Students are required to access the Canvas site regularly throughout the course for any announcements relating to the course.

 

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The ANU Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as providing clear guidance on the responsible and ethical use of AI technologies.

The following resources may also be useful:

• The ANU Library's Libguide is a valuable resource for gaining a comprehensive understanding of AI's role in academia.

• The ANU Academic Skills site provides useful information to ensure that you leverage AI responsibly and effectively.

• The ANU Law School Academic Integrity and Misconduct site provides content related to legal implications, ethical guidelines, and considerations when dealing with AI in the context of law. 

Class Schedule

Week/Session	Summary of Activities	Assessment
1	Law and Development: History and Core Concepts	This course is taught intensively - daily attendance and active engagement is expected. It is not a course that should be taken alongside other full-time commitments.In line with the University’s recording policy, lectures will be recorded and made available for students on Echo360. However, lecture recordings are only an additional resource, and they should not be taken as a substitute for regular attendance. If a recording does fail, there is no guarantee a replacement recording will be provided.
2	Gender and Development: History and Core Concepts
3	Gender and Legal Pluralities
4	Land, Property and Recognition	Assessment for Group 1
5	Political Citizenship and Participation	Assessment for Group 2
6	Labour and Economic Empowerment	Assessment for Group 3
7	Gender-Based Violence and Questions of Scale	Assessment for Group 4
8	Pluralism, Dispute Resolution and Criminal Justice	Assessment for Group 5
9	'Catch up' week	This class is devoted to reviewing materials, or covering materials not yet addressed elsewhere
10	Climate Change and Climate Justice
11	Practising Gender, Law and Development: MeToo and Decolonising Aid
12	Class wrap up

Tutorial Registration

ANU utilises MyTimetable to enable students to view the timetable for their enrolled courses, browse, then self-allocate to small teaching activities / tutorials so they can better plan their time. MyTimetable (MyTT) tutorial allocations are done on a first-come, first-served basis. If you hold a current EAP stating that you require priority selection, you will need to contact the College Student and Education Support team before MyTT opens.

If you are unable to secure a spot in your preferred timeslot, we recommend enrolling in another tutorial and joining the waitlist (indicated by a heart). If spots become available, they are automatically chronologically allocated to those on the waitlist.

Should an activity in MyTT clash with another, please contact the College Student and Education Support team with the course and activity details.

Please note that work commitments will not be considered as a reason for requesting a change to your allocation/s. It is expected that students make themselves available on weekdays for tutorials and seminars. 

Assessment Summary

Assessment task	Value	Due Date	Return of assessment	Learning Outcomes
Facilitating class discussion	10 %	*	25/02/2026	1,2,3,4
Discussion forum post	40 %	*	25/02/2025	1,2,3,4
Research essay	50 %	13/04/2026	*	1,2,3,4

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

• Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
• Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure
• Extenuating Circumstances Application
• Student Surveys and Evaluations
• Deferred Examinations
• Student Complaint Resolution Policy and Procedure
• Code of practice for teaching and learning

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Canvas’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

For all courses taught in any mode (whether face to face or online), the ANU College of Law, Governance and Policy considers participation in the classes offered to be an important part of the educational experience of the program. Students are expected to attend all classes.

If circumstances arise which are beyond a student’s control and they are unable to attend a class, the student should contact the Course Convenor in advance (where possible), so that the convenor can adjust their expectations in relation to numbers for that class. If it is not possible to give advance notice, students should send the convenor an email as soon as possible with evidence to support the reason for failure to attend.

Examination(s)

There is no final examination for this course.

Assessment Task 1

Facilitating class discussion

Details of Task: Leading class discussion. This course includes a component of group work, enabling students to develop professional skills that are vital in cross-cultural workplaces. Each student will be allocated to a numbered group (depending on the final registration numbers) which will be associated with a specific class. They will be provided with key materials (for example a program design document) and will consider the relationship with core concepts and debates discussed throughout the course. Students are free to decide on the precise format of their presentation. The purpose is to inform and prompt discussion of the application of core concepts discussed during the course to a specific example.

Nature of Task: Compulsory and non-redeemable. Failure to complete will result in a mark of zero for this task.

Weighting: 10%

Word limit: The total length of each group presentation will depend on the number of the presenters. Each individual student should present for a maximum of 10 minutes.

Due Date: Students will be allocated to one particular day. Due to the nature of the task, late submissions or extensions are not permitted.

If you are unable to present on the day due to extenuating circumstances and have documentation, please contact your convenor.

Extenuating circumstances that may warrant approval may include, but are not limited to:

- medical reasons (student injury, illness or medical condition);

- family/personal reasons (family injury or illness, bereavement);

- cultural or religious commitments; where a cultural or religious event conflicts with the scheduled tutorial.

Please note that approval will not be given for work related reasons.

Estimated return date: Wednesday 25 February 2026

Assessment Criteria:

• Ability to work as a team and to deliver a coherent presentation, which also affords each member of the team the opportunity to participate on an equitable basis; 
• Choice of format that is appropriate, accessible, and engaging; 
• Comprehension of competing conceptual approaches, their strengths and weaknesses, and application to specific examples.

Assessment Task 2

Discussion forum post

Details of Task: This course includes a component of group work (see Assessment Task 1) which is linked with this individualised assessment task (Assessment Task 2). During each class, students will have time to work in their groups to discuss the prescribed readings and develop questions they wish to ask their allocated guest speakers. 

Assessment Task 2 has two parts.

• Part A requires students to upload a 1600-word blog post to the discussion forum, BEFORE their allocated class. They should discuss the insights they have drawn from the readings, consider how their own positionality and that of the authors of papers shapes their engagement with the issues, and identify outstanding issues or questions that they wish to discuss in the class.
• Part B requires a second, 800-word post post, to be uploaded within 24 hours of the class. This post should discuss their reflections on the class, any aspects of the class or material that surprised, challenged, or otherwise impacted them, and identify any outstanding issues, questions or dilemmas they have. 

This course also emphasises (a) writing in a clear and concise way accessible to many audiences and (b) students to practice a reflexive approach to the study of law and development, including in relation to the texts and issues discussed throughout the course. This assessment task therefore requires students to write in first person and explain how and why the questions they wish to pursue further are of particular interest to them.

Please note that students will need to upload their posts to the discussion forum AND to TurnItIn for the purposes of assessment as per ANU policy. Further details of this assessment may also be provided on Canvas.

Nature of Task: Compulsory and non-redeemable. Failure to complete will result in a mark of zero for this task.

Weighting: 40%

Word limit: 2400 words. The ANU School of Law’s excess word penalty policy can be found here. Your submission must be made in a word processing file format (.doc, .docx). PDF files will not be accepted.

Due Date: To be compiled and uploaded to Turnitin within 48 hours of the relevant class. Due to the nature of the task, late submission (without an extension) is NOT permitted. Where you have not been granted an extension, any submission after the due time will not be accepted and a mark of zero will be awarded.

Estimated return date: Within 48 hours of the work being submitted on TurnItIn.

Assessment Criteria: Your review should seek to critically examine the key points, arguments and themes across each session; identify where they differ or converge; and reflect on the implications for your own practices in relation to gender, law and development. Your critical review will be assessed against the following criteria:

(a) Understanding of the issues

• Evidence of reading, understanding and reflection on the core issues raised in the prescribed readings and in the course.
• Consideration of how these ideas might apply to the student’s current or future role as a law and development practitioner.
• Consideration of how the authors' and the student's own experiences, knowledges, training and context might shape their approach to the issues under consideration.

(b) Communication and development of argument

• Clear, logical and well-ordered argument that is drawn from, and builds upon, the prescribed reading and your own reflections and outstanding questions

(c) Argument and analysis

• Original, reasoned arguments, considering, contrasting and analysing competing views and articulating the aspect of the literature that you consider most important or relevant.
• Demonstration of an analytic focus on the relationships between, and the interests of, the many stakeholders in gender, law and development initiatives.
• Engaging with the larger themes addressed in the course.
• Clear and consistent consideration of how the positionalities of the authors shapes their approach to the issues under consideration.

(d) Presentation, style and referencing

• Structure, use of paragraphs and headings (if appropriate), grammar, clear and concise expression, style and full and accurate footnotes according to AGLC (3rd ed 2010).

Assessment Task 3

Research essay

Details of Task: The research paper addresses a topic from a selected list provided by the Course Convenor.

This course requires students to practice a reflexive approach to the study of “law” and “development”, and to reflect on their own present or future roles as law and development practitioners. This activity requires students to write in first person and consider their 'positionality' or 'situatedness' in law and development, including in relation to the texts and issues discussed throughout the course.

We will practice these skills throughout the course. During the classes, time will be set aside for students to write brief ‘journal entries’ in which they critically reflect on the prescribed readings, discussions in class, and the implications for their own practice. Following the completion of classes, students may use one or several of these ‘journal entries’ to develop this brief reflective essay, which focuses on the role of law and development practitioners in the development process, and the implications for their own practice. Students choose their own topic for reflection. Students who do not have any professional experience in the law and development field will be able to draw on their experiences as a student.

Nature of Task: Compulsory and non-redeemable. Failure to submit this assessment will result in a mark of zero for this assessment task.

Relationship between the Assessment Task and the Course Objectives: This assessment task is relevant to all learning outcomes. This assessment will allow students to employ the skills they have developed during the course and demonstrate their understanding of a variety of research and writing methods, their ability to communicate an argument, and their capacity to undertake research using appropriate methodology.

Nature of Task: Compulsory and non-redeemable. Failure to complete will result in a mark of zero for this task.

Weighting: 50%

Word limit: 3000 words. The ANU School of Law’s excess word penalty policy can be found here. Your submission must be made in a word processing file format (.doc, .docx). PDF files will not be accepted.

Due Date: 5pm, Thursday 9 April 2025 via Turnitin. Late submissions (without an extension) are permitted, but late penalties will apply. Please be aware that if you are in your final course(s), any late submissions may delay your conferral date.

Estimated return date: Results for non-standard sessions will be released approximately one month from the course end date. Please note that due to the work scheduling of the convenor, essays that are submitted late may have a delay in being marked.

Assessment Criteria:

The criteria for assessment include:

(a) Understanding of the issues

• the choice of the research topic or question, having regard to difficulty, originality and relevance to the course;
• evidence of literature review to identify points of debate or contention among authors in the field; and
• material chosen relates clearly to the topic and is analysed not just summarised or quoted extensively
• student clearly and consistently links the arguments to their own experiences, knowledge, context, positionality, and situatedness

(b) Communication and development of argument

• explanation of why the topic is of interest to the student;
• the quality and coherence of the arguments made;
• the degree of complexity and insight demonstrated in dealing with the issues related to the research topic;
• extent to which the student can link the arguments with their own experiences, positionality and situatedness
• extent to which competing arguments are considered and addressed
• awareness and consideration of how the authors' positionality, or historical and social context, might shape their approach to the issues
• use of case studies or examples to explore the key issues.

(c) Research

• the breadth and/or depth of research, and the choice of materials and sources;
• use of a range of resources, including primary and secondary material and theoretical literature;
• critical analysis of material, rather than simply summarising or extensively quoting material; and
• good organisation of sources and ability to synthesise all the research materials used, both in relation to the literature review and case studies or examples. 

(d) Presentation, style and referencing

• the clarity of the structure and the organisation of the paper;
• appropriate referencing.

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.

The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.

The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.

 

The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. You must ensure that you upload the correct document on the specified submission due date and time. Any document modified after the due date and time will either incur a late penalty or will NOT be accepted. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education), submission must be through Turnitin in a word processing file format (.doc, .docx). Electronic copies in .pdf file format are not acceptable.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:

• Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
• Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item.
• Late submission is not accepted for tests or examinations.
• Late submission with an extension. To ensure equity for all students, the 5% penalty per working day for late submission of work does not apply if you have been granted an extension. Where an extension is granted, the revised due date and submission time will be provided in writing. Importantly, any revised due date is inclusive of weekends and public holidays. Regardless of which day of the week the revised due date falls on, students who submit after that date will be penalised by 5% of the possible marks available for the task per 24-hour period.

Referencing Requirements

The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material. Any use of artificial intelligence must be properly referenced. Failure to properly cite use of Generative AI will be considered a breach of academic integrity.

Returning Assignments

All marks and feedback will be provided online by the return date listed in the class summary.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Resubmission of Assignments

• Maximum Submissions: Students can submit up to three times per assessment.
• Final Submission Counts: Only the last uploaded version will be marked — provided it is uploaded before marking begins.
• Late Submissions: If submitted after the due date, the final version will still be marked, but late penalties will apply (unless an extension has been approved).
• No Submissions After Return Date: Once the return-of-assessment date has passed, NO submissions will be accepted.
• Marking Already Started: If a marker has already begun marking a version, that version will be the one assessed — even if a newer one is uploaded later

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

• ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
• ANU Accessibility for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
• ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
• ANU Academic Skills supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
• ANU Counselling promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
• ANUSA supports and represents all ANU students