- Class Number 4126
- Term Code 3330
- Class Info
- Unit Value 6 units
- Mode of Delivery In Person
- Joshua Neoh
- Class Dates
- Class Start Date 20/02/2023
- Class End Date 26/05/2023
- Census Date 31/03/2023
- Last Date to Enrol 27/02/2023
This course introduces students to the legal systems and legal traditions of South East Asia in the context of their plural societies, and considers the relationship between law, governance and development in the region over the span of modern history. Among the topics covered in the course include:
• pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial law, including customary and religious law;
• the influence of legal transplants, state-building, and development initiatives;
• critical consideration of theoretical frameworks used to make sense of the diversity in the region;
• key issues relating to constitutionalism and nation-building;
• domestic challenges such as ethnic and sectarian conflict;
• the role of law in socio-economic change in the region.
Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
- Analyze and critically evaluate the historical evolution of the legal systems in South East Asia;
- Evaluate the role of legal institutions in governance and development in South East Asia, and present the evaluation in verbal form;
- Assess contemporary academic and policy debates about law and society in South East Asia, and participate in those debates orally;
- Access South East Asian legal materials for research purposes and employ a variety of research methodologies;
- Plan and execute complex legal research on issues relating to law and society in South East Asia, and present the research findings in written form.
There is no prescribed textbook for this course. A full list of readings/E brick will be made available on Wattle two weeks prior to the course commencement date.
Whether you are on campus or studying remotely, there are a variety of online platforms you will use to participate in your study program. These could include videos for lectures and other instruction, two-way video conferencing for interactive learning, email and other messaging tools for communication, interactive web apps for formative and collaborative activities, print and/or photo/scan for handwritten work and drawings, and home-based assessment.
ANU outlines recommended student system requirements to ensure you are able to participate fully in your learning. Other information is also available about the various Learning Platforms you may use.
Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:
- written comments
- verbal comments
- feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc.
ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.
Task submission times refer to Canberra time (AEST/AEDT).
Extensions late submission and penalties - https://law.anu.edu.au/current-students/policies-procedures/extensions-late-submission-and-penalties
Deferred examination: http://www.anu.edu.au/students/program-administration/assessments-exams/deferred-examinations
Special consideration: http://www.anu.edu.au/students/program-administration/assessments-exams/special-assessment-consideration
Penalties for excess word length: https://law.anu.edu.au/current-students/policies-procedures/word-length-and-excess-word-penalties
Distribution of Grades Policy: https://law.anu.edu.au/current-students/policies-procedures/grading
Further Information about the Course: is available from the course WATTLE page. Students are required to access the WATTLE site regularly throughout the course for details on weekly classes and any announcements and updates relating to the course.
|Week/Session||Summary of Activities||Assessment|
|1||Introduction||Due to the controversial nature of the topics covered in this course, the classes will NOT be recorded. This course will be taught entirely in-person. It is NOT possible to complete this course online. Students are expected to attend all classes in-person.|
|2||Constitution of Malaysia|
|3||Case 1: Lina Joy v Islamic Religious Council|
|4||Case 2: Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur v Home Minister|
|5||Case 3: Indira Gandhi v Director of the Islamic Department|
|6||Constitution of Singapore||Mock Essay Exercise (Optional)|
|7||Case 4: Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General|
|8||Case 5: Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General|
|9||Basic Law of Hong Kong|
|10||Case 6: Ng Ka Ling v Director of Immigration|
|11||Case 7: Sixtus Leung v Chief Executive of the HKSAR|
There are no tutorials in this course.
|Assessment task||Value||Due Date||Return of assessment||Learning Outcomes|
|Mock Essay Exercise (Optional)||0 %||27/03/2023||27/03/2023||1,4,5|
|Class Participation||10 %||*||29/05/2023||2,3|
|Research Essay||70 %||01/06/2023||29/06/2023||1,4,5|
* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details
ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:
- Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure
- Special Assessment Consideration Guideline and General Information
- Student Surveys and Evaluations
- Deferred Examinations
- Student Complaint Resolution Policy and Procedure
- Code of practice for teaching and learning
The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.
Moderation of Assessment
Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.
This course will be taught entirely in-person. It is NOT possible to complete this course online. The classes will NOT be recorded. Students are expected to attend all classes in-person.
There is no final examination for this course.
Assessment Task 1
Learning Outcomes: 1,4,5
Mock Essay Exercise (Optional)
Brief Description: In the Week 6 class, we will have a mock essay exercise in class to prepare students for the final research paper. Feedback will be provided in class and this is an opportunity for students to receive formative feedback.
Nature of Task: This task is optional, and it has no impact on the final mark for the course.
Release: Monday 27 March 2023
Due date: Monday 27 March 2023
Estimated return date: Monday 27 March 2023
Assessment Criteria: As this mock essay exercise is a preparation for the final research paper, the assessment criteria are the same as the final research paper.
Assessment Task 2
Learning Outcomes: 2,3
Details of Task: This task will assess the student's ability to evaluate contemporary debates about law and society in South East Asia, and participate in those debates in a class discussion.
Nature of Task: Compulsory and non-redeemable. Failure to complete this assessment will result in a mark of zero for this assessment task.
Duration: Throughout the 12 weekly seminars in the course.
Estimated Return Date: Monday 29 May 2023 via Wattle.
Assessment Criteria: The discussion in class should (a) be informed by the readings, and (b) engage with what others have said in class.
Assessment Task 3
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3
Brief Description: Law is about argument and advocacy in the resolution of concrete cases. This course is centered on 7 cases. Each case has two sides: the plaintiff and the defendant. There are 14 positions in total. Each student will be assigned to take a position. The student should present and defend that position in class in the week in which the case is discussed. The presenter needs to upload their notes of their key points via Turnitin prior to the start of their assigned seminar. Both components will be taken into account in awarding the marks for this assessment and further details will be provided in class.
Nature of Task: Compulsory and non-redeemable. Failure to complete this assessment will result in a mark of zero for this assessment task.
Release: The list of allocation will be released in Week 1. The allocation will be done alphabetically.
Due date: In the assigned seminar based on the allocation list via Wattle and the notes submitted before the start of the assigned seminar. Due to the nature of the task, late submission or extension is not permitted.
Estimated return date: Feedback will be provided the following week of the allocated seminar via Wattle.
Assessment Criteria: The presenter should be able to (a) defend a legal position with well-considered and sophisticated legal arguments, and (b) present the argument in the form of an oral advocacy, as would be required of an advocate. A detailed assessment Rubric will be made available on Wattle.
Assessment Task 4
Learning Outcomes: 1,4,5
Brief Description: The research essay should answer the question that is posed.
Nature of Task: Compulsory and non-redeemable. Failure to complete this assessment task will result in a mark of zero for this task.
Word Limit: 2800 words. The ANU College of Law's Word Length and Excess Word penalties policy can be found here. Footnotes should be used for referencing of sources. All references should be in the style required by the current edition of the Australian Guide to Legal Citation.
Release: The essay question will be released on Wattle on Monday 1 May 2023.
Due date: 5pm, Thursday 1 June 2023 via Turnitin. Late submission is permitted, but late penalties will be applied. Your submission must be made in a word processing file format (.doc, .docx). PDF files will not be accepted.
Return date: Official end of semester results release date via Turnitin.
Selection of a relevant and appropriate theoretical framework (if applicable).
Clear explanation of what the paper is attempting to accomplish.
Ability to evaluate materials critically.
Quality and precision of supporting arguments.
Ability to anticipate and respond to possible objections.
Where necessary, use of appropriately chosen examples.
Clarity and coherence of structure and argument.
Construction of a sustained argument, including the avoidance of irrelevant discussion and repetition.
Clarity and precision of use of language.
Conventional spelling, grammar and syntax.
Avoidance of waffle.
Prose easy to read, argument easy to follow.
Compliance with the Australian Guide to Legal Citation.
Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.
The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.
The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.
The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.
You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.
For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.
Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:
- Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
- Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item.
- Late submission is not accepted for tests or examinations.
- Late submission with an extension. To ensure equity for all students, the 5% penalty per working day for late submission of work does not apply if you have been granted an extension. Where an extension is granted, the revised due date and submission time will be provided in writing. Importantly, any revised due date is inclusive of weekends and public holidays. Regardless of which day of the week the revised due date falls on, students who submit after that date will be penalised by 5% of the possible marks available for the task per 24-hour period.
The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material.
All marks and feedback will be provided online by the return date listed in the class summary.
Extensions and Penalties
Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.
Distribution of grades policy
Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.
Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.
Support for students
The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).
- ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
- ANU Access and inclusion for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
- ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
- ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
- ANU Counselling Centre promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
- ANUSA supports and represents undergraduate and ANU College students
- PARSA supports and represents postgraduate and research students