• Class Number 9869
  • Term Code 2960
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 units
  • Mode of Delivery In Person
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • Prof Simon Grant
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 22/07/2019
  • Class End Date 25/10/2019
  • Census Date 31/08/2019
  • Last Date to Enrol 29/07/2019
SELT Survey Results

Advanced Research Essay A and Advanced Research Essay B form a two-semester sequence of courses whose aim is to provide Master of Economics students who have excelled academically in the first year of their masters program, an option to conduct an extended supervised research project. In Advanced Research Essay A, students conduct independent study on a particular topic chosen in agreement with their supervisor, write a literature review on this topic, and prepare a proposal for an extended
research essay.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

  1. Identify and develop a suitable and feasible research essay topic
  2. Analyse relevant literature to the topic
  3. Apply appropriate economic methods of analysis.
  4. Use software, databanks and other tools relevant for research.
  5. Ability to present research outcomes to the audience.

Research-Led Teaching

In consultation with your supervisor the student will develop a topic for the research essay that will be completed in the second semester course ECON8888.

Field Trips

Data collection if relevant.

Examination Material or equipment

In the first semester the student will prepare a progress report that outlines the topic and economic question or problem that it addresses. This will include a justification for why it is an interesting problem along with the methodology that will be employed and a literature survey of the most relevant and up to date research. Finally the student will present a draft of the research plan for ECON8888 as well a time year for the second semester research.

Required Resources

Data sets if needed.

This will be determined on an individual basis in consultation with the supervisor.

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

  • written comments
  • verbal comments
  • feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.

Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 Consultation with supervisor as required.

Tutorial Registration

N/A

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Due Date Return of assessment Learning Outcomes
Literature Review 40 % 23/08/2019 30/08/2019 1,2
Research Proposal 40 % 25/10/2019 05/12/2019 3,4
Presentation. 20 % 21/10/2019 05/12/2019 5

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the ANU Online website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Assessment Task 1

Value: 40 %
Due Date: 23/08/2019
Return of Assessment: 30/08/2019
Learning Outcomes: 1,2

Literature Review

40% Due end of Week 05. Word limit 3000 words. Students will choose a research topic in consultation with the supervisor in the first two weeks of the semester. The literature survey is to be handed in via Turnitin.

Rubric

Assessment Task 2

Value: 40 %
Due Date: 25/10/2019
Return of Assessment: 05/12/2019
Learning Outcomes: 3,4

Research Proposal

40% Due end of Week 12. Word limit 3000 words. Students will choose a research topic in consultation with the supervisor in the first two weeks of the semester. Hand it in via Turnitin.

Assessment Task 3

Value: 20 %
Due Date: 21/10/2019
Return of Assessment: 05/12/2019
Learning Outcomes: 5

Presentation.

20%. Presentations will be scheduled in the final teaching week of Semester 2. Presentation will last for thirty minutes. Students should allow for at least seven minutes for questions. Presentations will be video recorded (separately to Echo360), which will enable later validation and verification of assessment if required (in accordance with point 7 in the ANU Student Assessment (Coursework) policy).

Rubric

HDDCP<>

Theory

Clear and coherent explanation of all relevant theories pertaining to the proposed research question/topic. Able to synthesize the multiple theories.

Clear and coherent explanation of some relevant theories pertaining to the proposed research question/topic. Covered more than one relevant theory.

Some explanation of theories relevant theories pertaining to the research question/topic. Did not discuss/review all relevant theories.

Some limited explanation of theories relevant theories pertaining to the research question/topic. Did not discuss/review all relevant theories and some errors.

Little to no explanation of theories relevant theories pertaining to the research question/topic. Did not discuss/review all relevant theories and/or incorrect use of theories.

Data (if relevant)

Excellent use of data, with all data correctly referenced. Original graphs and tables compiled. Excellent presentation with a high level of clarity.

Good use of data, with all data correctly referenced .Original graphs and tables compiled. Good presentation with a reasonable level of clarity.

Most necessary data collected and largely correctly referenced. Some atempt at original graphs and tables compiled. Reasonable presentation with some level of clarity.

Some necessary data, but not all and only partially referenced. Unoriginal graphs and tables compiled. Reasonable presentation but lacking clarity.

Some necessary data, but not all. Little to no referencing. Unoriginal graphs and tables compiled. Poor presentation and lacking clarity.

Outline of planned analysis (either theoretical and/or empirical)

Clear linking of relevant economic theory with proposed research question/topic. Able to bring multiple ideas together.

Able to link relevant economic theory with proposed research question/topic. Attempt to bring multiple ideas together.

Attempt to link relevant economic theory with proposed research question/topic, but not done entirely correctly.

Limited attempt to link relevant economic theory with proposed research question/topic. Mostly descriptive presentation of information/data.

Limited to no attempt to link relevant economic theory with proposed research question/topic, purely a descriptive presentation of information/data.

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically, committing to honest and responsible scholarly practice and upholding these values with respect and fairness.


The ANU commits to assisting all members of our community to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle and Academic Misconduct Rule, uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with.


The Academic Misconduct Rule is in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Very minor breaches of the academic integrity principle may result in a reduction of marks of up to 10% of the total marks available for the assessment. The ANU offers a number of online and in person services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. Visit the Academic Skills website for more information about academic integrity, your responsibilities and for assistance with your assignments, writing skills and study.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

  • Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:
  • Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. The Course Convener may grant extensions for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

Prof Simon Grant
6125 8688
simon.grant@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Prof Simon Grant

Monday 09:00 10:00

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions