- Class Number 4847
- Term Code 2930
- Class Info
- Unit Value 6 units
- Mode of Delivery In Person
- Dr Sally Curtis
- Dr Sally Curtis
- Class Dates
- Class Start Date 25/02/2019
- Class End Date 31/05/2019
- Census Date 31/03/2019
- Last Date to Enrol 04/03/2019
Business cannot operate without the people who are its stakeholders, and the social and human capital that they provide. This course builds on MGMT2001 to give students a deeper understanding of the interrelationship between business and its social stakeholders, and how that relationship is best managed by business. Topics include defining and managing the relationship with stakeholders; and building, capturing value from, and protecting social capital.
Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
- Analyse the interrelationship between an business and its social stakeholders by applying appropriate theories, models, and/or frameworks ;
- Formulate appropriate policies and strategies to manage the interrelationship between business and its social stakeholders that enable outcomes that are both economically and socially sustainable
- Communicate these policies and strategies both in writing and orally to stakeholders to engender business support for socially-sustainable outcomes
This course introduces students to research concerned with corporate social responsibility and illustrates ways in which findings of empirical research can be applied to business decisions to improve business outcomes.
Additional Course Costs
Examination Material or equipment
There is no examination for this course.
Textbook: Chandler, David. (2017). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Sustainable value creation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
The textbook is available on short-term loan at the library. It is also available as an e-book for students wishing to acquire the book at a more affordable cost.
Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:
- Written comments
- Verbal comments
- Feedback to the whole class
Student FeedbackANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.
|Week/Session||Summary of Activities||Assessment|
|1||Seminar 1 Course Administration and Introduction||Reading: Chapter 1|
|2||Seminar 2 Driving Forces of Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Rights and Responsibilities||Reading: Chapter 2 and 3|
|3||Seminar 3 Stakeholder Theory Introduction to CSR Simulation||Reading: Chapter 4 Complete case study readings|
|4||Seminar 4 Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility Class Discussion: Simulation Year 1||Reading: Chapter 5 Assessment: Case Study Year 1 (due before Friday seminar)|
|5||Seminar 5 Who Owns the Corporation? Class Discussion: Impact Investing Case Study||Reading: Chapter 6 and Impact Investing Case Study (p. 126)|
|6||Seminar 6 The Pursuit of Profit Class Discussion: Simulation Year 2||Reading: Chapter 7 Assessment: Case Study Year 2 (due before Friday seminar)|
|7||Seminar 7 Incentives and Compliance Class Discussion: Financial Crisis Case Study||Reading: Chapter 8 and 9 and Financial Crisis Case Study (p. 199)|
|8||Seminar 8 ?Accountability Class Discussion: Simulation Year 3||Reading: Chapter 9 Assessment: Case Study Year 3 (due Friday before seminar)|
|9||Seminar 9 Strategy and CSR I||Reading: Chapter 10 and Supply Chain Case Study (p. 279)|
|10||Seminar 10 Strategy and CSR II Class Discussion: Simulation Year 4||Reading: Chapter 11 and 12 Assessment: Case Study Year 4 (due Friday before seminar)|
|11||Seminar 11 Guest Speaker||No required reading.|
|12||Seminar 12 Class Discussion: Simulation Year 5 Course Wrap-Up||Assessment: Case Study Year 5 (due before Friday seminar)|
|Assessment task||Value||Due Date||Return of assessment||Learning Outcomes|
|Seminar Participation and Learning Journal||30 %||01/03/2019||19/04/2019||1|
|Weekly Case Study Discussion and Decision Making||30 %||06/03/2019||19/04/2019||1,2,3|
|Research Paper||40 %||23/04/2019||04/07/2019||1,2,3|
* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details
PoliciesANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:
Assessment RequirementsThe ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the ANU Online website Students may choose not to submit assessment items through Turnitin. In this instance you will be required to submit, alongside the assessment item itself, hard copies of all references included in the assessment item.
Moderation of AssessmentMarks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.
Active participation in seminars is an important component of the course. Assessment Task 1 relates to student participation in seminars. Assessment Task 2 requires students to form a group and participate in a simulation.
There is no examination for this course.
Assessment Task 1
Learning Outcomes: 1
Seminar Participation and Learning Journal
Student attendance and participation in seminars is vital to learning in this course. Seminars provide a forum for structured discussion, problem solving, argument, and opinion on topics and issues canvassed in this course. Each student is expected to make a consistent, informed, and considered contribution to seminar discussion and debate. Students will be expected to come class prepared and to have read the assigned reading for each seminar. To facilitate learning in this course students are also required to submit a weekly entry between 300 and 600 words in a Learning Journal on Wattle. This submission should draw on your learning from seminar discussions, readings and participation in the simulation. Further details and a marking rubric will be available on Wattle.
Due Date: Friday Week 1-6
Submission Form: Turnitin
Feedback: Feedback will be provided each Tuesday of the week via Turnitin.
Assessment Task 2
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3
Weekly Case Study Discussion and Decision Making
One of the learning outcomes of this course involves students analysing the interrelationship between business and its stakeholders and formulating strategies to manage this relationship to achieve outcomes that are both economically and socially sustainable. This assessment is aimed at providing students with an opportunity to do this by participating in a case study exercise spanning several weeks.
In the case study, your group of three students will assume the role of a newly appointed Corporate Responsibility and Ethics Officer (CREO) for a fictional cell phone company, K-Tai Inc. As the firm’s new CREO, you will work within a budget to set up the CREO’s office, employ personnel, and respond to various scenarios that are presented to you over multiple years of operations. The scenarios in the case emerge from the firm’s wide range of stakeholders, and the CREO’s responses have consequences at the individual, firm, and industry levels. The focus of the case study, therefore, is to present students with a range of issues to address from a broad stakeholder perspective. That is, think through the implications of each decision for each of the firm’s stakeholders, attempting to create the most value for as many stakeholder groups as possible. The more students take into account the interests and needs of the firm’s broad range of stakeholders, the better you will perform in this assessment.
The case study spans 5 years of operations. After each year of decisions, your group will be asked to write a short memo justifying the choices that you made and submit this on Turnitin. After each ‘year’, at the beginning of the next seminar, we will discuss each group's decisions and your reasons for making them. Students will be required to self-select into groups of three in Seminar 2.
Further details about the case study and marking criteria will be provided on WATTLE.
Schedule of Due Dates:
Year 1 Decisions: 9am Fri 8 March
Year 2 Decisions: 9am Fri 15 March
Year 3 Decisions: 9am Fri 22 March
Year 4 Decisions: 9am Fri 29 March
Year 5 Decisions: 9am Fri 5 April
Form of Submission: Assignment link on WATTLE.
Return of Assessment: within two weeks of final decision submission.
Assessment Task 3
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3
For this assignment students will select an issue from the simulation that you found interesting and relevant for businesses today. For the first part of the paper, you will summarise the issue, building an argument that the issue at stake is important. Then, you will examine relevant academic literature to understand the issue from a research perspective and discuss the management implications of your research.
The paper must be written individually. The research paper is designed to test critical thinking, analytical, and research skills. Students are expected to draw upon research evidence and theory from scholarly journal articles.
Harvard referencing is required, a guide is available at: https://library.sydney.edu.au/subjects/downloads/citation/Harvard_Complete.pdf
The paper must be between 3,000 to 3,500 words. More details and a marking rubric will be available on WATTLE.
Due Date: 4pm Tuesday 23 April
Submission Form: Turnitin
Return of Assessment: After release of final grades
Academic IntegrityAcademic integrity is a core part of our culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically. This means that all members of the community commit to honest and responsible scholarly practice and to upholding these values with respect and fairness. The Australian National University commits to embedding the values of academic integrity in our teaching and learning. We ensure that all members of our community understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with. The University has policies and procedures in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Visit the following Academic honesty & plagiarism website for more information about academic integrity and what the ANU considers academic misconduct. The ANU offers a number of services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. The Academic Skills and Learning Centre offers a number of workshops and seminars that you may find useful for your studies.
Online SubmissionThe ANU uses Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. While the use of Turnitin is not mandatory, the ANU highly recommends Turnitin is used by both teaching staff and students. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the ANU Online website.
Hardcopy SubmissionFor some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.
Assessment Task 1
Late submission of assessment tasks 2 and 3 without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not permitted for assessment task 1 (seminar participation and learning journal).
Referencing RequirementsAccepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.
Feedback will be provided to students on Turnitin. Students will receive ongoing feedback related to their performance in the simulation via the simulation website (in the form of a team score).
Extensions and PenaltiesExtensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure The Course Convener may grant extensions for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.
Resubmission of Assignments
Re-submission of assignments is not allowed in this course.
Distribution of grades policyAcademic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes. Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.
Support for studentsThe University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).
- ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
- ANU Diversity and inclusion for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
- ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
- ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
- ANU Counselling Centre promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
- ANUSA supports and represents undergraduate and ANU College students
- PARSA supports and represents postgraduate and research students
Sally is interested in how leaders and organisations address grand challenges in society (also known as wicked problems).
Dr Sally Curtis