The Master of Science Communication Research Project involves a substantive investigation of an approved topic in science communication. It is a compulsory course for all students enrolled in the Master of Science Communication program.

Students devise their own science communication research project in collaboration with the supervisor, or can pursue a topic already offered by the supervisor. The project should be devised and conducted with journal publication in mind as the desired end goal.

The course can be taken as 18 or 24 units completed within a single semester, or two consecutive semesters. Students will complete a minimum of 18 units in this course, but students who hope to use the Master of Science Communication program as a stepping stone to higher degree research are advised to complete a total of 24 units. The course convener can advise on this decision.

• The 18-unit version of the course entails a research project with a significant original component, aspiring to professional-level data collection and analysis, with ethics approval required for any human participant element. 
• The 24-unit version of the course involves a research project as for the 18-unit version, plus compulsory research methods training. This training could involve completing specific, externally provided research training activities (such as the online courses offered by the Statistical Consulting Unit) to an acceptable standard, or completing a 4000 word literature review on relevant research methods to an acceptable standard, or similar. The research methods training is a hurdle requirement which doesn't contribute to the final mark, but has to be completed to pass the course. The course convener will set and assess this item, in consultation with the supervisor and student.

Students must discuss their project ideas with the course convener prior to enrolling in the course to ensure they enrol in the appropriate version and that an appropriate supervisor can be found.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

On satisfying the requirements of this course, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

1. Plan and engage in an independent and sustained critical investigation and evaluation of a chosen research topic
2. Systematically identify relevant theory and concepts, relate these to appropriate methodologies and evidence, and draw appropriate conclusions
3. Engage in systematic discovery and critical review of appropriate and relevant information sources
4. Appropriately apply statistical or other evaluation processes to original data
5. Understand and apply ethical standards of conduct in the collection and evaluation of data and other resources
6. Communicate research concepts and contexts clearly and effectively both in writing and orally

Research-Led Teaching

The entire course is devoted to teaching and learning research skills and conducting original science communication research for potential publication. Students will learn core

knowledge about conducting science communication research and will implement that.

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in this course in several ways.:

• Assignment 1 will be examined by two academics (not the project supervisor) and will receive extensive written feedback. Your supervisor will also be able to give you formative feedback on your work throughout the semester in your weekly hour of time with them.
• Assignment 2 will be marked by the course convener and will receive extensive written feedback.
• Assignment 3 will generally just receive a mark if it is completed, but if you raise problems in it the course convener can use it as a talking point to help you solve them. You will also receive formative feedback on your project progress from the convener and workshop group when you deliver your short presentation about your research in week 7.
• Feedback on assignment 4 will be negotiated on a case by case basis and will depend on the nature of that assignment agreed upon for each student.

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.

Other Information

In this course you will engage in self-directed research most of the time, under supervision. Most of the hours you devote to the course will be spent this way. The convener will also organise 7 workshops in the first half of the course, in which you will receive training in writing review papers, writing research papers, human participant ethics, authorship ethics, using bibliographic software, writing for 'The Conversation', and the journal paper publication process. These are not compulsory, but you are strongly encouraged to attend them in your first semester of enrolment. Provision can be made for students to attend virtually via Skype or similar upon request.

• The 18-unit version of the course entails a research project with a significant original component, aspiring to professional-level data collection and analysis, with ethics approval required for any human participant element.
• The 24-unit version of the course involves a research project as for the 18-unit version, plus compulsory research methods training. This training could involve completing specific, externally provided research training activities (such as the online courses offered by the Statistical Consulting Unit) to an acceptable standard, or completing a 4000 word literature review on relevant research methods to an acceptable standard, or similar. The research methods training is a hurdle requirement which doesn't contribute to the final mark, but has to be completed to pass the course. The course convener will set and assess this item, in consultation with the supervisor and student.

Projects must be completed within a single semester, or within two consecutive semesters.

The possible enrolment patterns are detailed in Wattle. The course can be taken as 18 or 24 units. The default is 18 units, but students who hope to use the Master of Science Communication program as a stepping stone to higher degree reearch such as a PhD are advised to enrol in the 24 unit version of the course. The course convener can advise on this decision.

In rare circumstances where students are compelled to take a semester off study for

external or personal reasons, an exemption to this rule may be granted, and a student may

be given permission to complete the project over two non-consecutive semesters.

Time commitment, workshops and role of supervisor

You are expected to devote approximately 10 hours per week to the course for every 6 units of enrolment. That means a 6 unit enrolment in one semester will require a total of 120-150 hours of work from you. In total, an 18 unit enrolment will require 360-450 hours of work, and a 24 unit enrolment will require 480-600 hours of work.

For the first 6 weeks of your first semester of enrolment, you are strongly encouraged to attend the 2 hour workshop organised by the convener each week, covering topics of

importance to science communication research, as outlined above. In the first week back after the teaching break we will have our final workshop, in which you will be expected to

prepare a 5-10 minute summary of your project to share with the group (if you attend). All these workshops will also be attended by students in the undergraduate equivalent of this

course, SCOM3003, who are completing a smaller research project.

In addition to the workshops and private study time, you will work with a supervisor who will guide your project. You should talk to your supervisor about how regularly you want to

meet to discuss your project, and what other support they can offer you. Generally speaking you will be entitled to about 12 hours of your supervisor's time across the duration of the project. This might take the form of fortnightly meetings across the two semesters (not during teaching breaks) or you might instead want to ask them to read and

give feedback on a piece of writing as you work towards completion.

If you need a staff member's assistance beyond those 12 hours, approach the course convener.

Class Schedule

Week/Session	Summary of Activities	Assessment
1	(It is assumed for this section that students will take this course over two semesters, though it is possible to do in 1 if you're brave). Suggestions below for timing are just suggestions - please discuss with your supervisor. In weeks 1-2 students will propose potential research areas to the Course Convener, who will then match them with a supervisor.
2	In subsequent weeks students will meet regularly with supervisor (at least fortnightly is suggested) to design and conduct the research project. As a suggestion, in the first quarter of your total project time you would conduct a literature review, design your method of data collection and submit your method (if appropriate) for ethical review.
3	In the second quarter of project time you might collect data.
4	In the third quarter of project time you might analyse that data.
5	And in the final quarter of project time you might write up and submit your final research report.

Assessment Summary

Assessment task	Value	Due Date	Return of assessment	Learning Outcomes
Research report	90 %	06/06/2019	04/07/2019	1,2,3,4,5,6
Article	10 %	06/06/2019	04/07/2019	6

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

• Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure
• Special Assessment Consideration Policy and General Information 
• Student Surveys and Evaluations
• Deferred Examinations
• Student Complaint Resolution Policy and Procedure

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the ANU Online website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

There is no assessable participation requirement of this course.

Assessment Task 1

Research report

5000-8000 word report, in style of journal paper, written as if for Public Understanding of Science or other relevant journal.

Due: Friday, exam week 2

Returned: within 3 weeks from submission

Details of task:

Producing this assignment is the major task of the course. The final product you are aiming for is a research report in the style of a science communication journal paper, or manuscript ready for submission to a journal. The idea is to design and complete an original research project and write it up for publication. In an ideal world your research and your report will be so great that you can submit the assignment to a journal directly with no changes, so that's what you should aim for. The report should take the form of either a research paper or a review paper, depending on your project.

You should conform to the submission requirements of the journal Public Understanding of Science or other relevant journal (discuss with your supervisor) when completing your report, including its referencing style guide, word count and general expectations of the journal. You should discuss the choice of journal with your supervisor and the course convener before nominating one.

Marking criteria

To be eligible for a pass in this assignment:

• The assignment must be 5000-8000 words total, including all headings and titles, the abstract, the reference list and any tables and figures, as per the requirements of Public Understanding of Science or other relevant journal. If you fail to meet this requirement you will fail the assignment irrespective of its quality otherwise.
• You must comply with all ethical requirements of the project.

What your assignment should ideally demonstrate:

• A report that conforms to the journal's specified submission requirements, style guide, and general tone and scope, as well as general expectations of a research paper or review paper published in a peer-reviewed journal.
• A well planned project that has been expertly designed to answer an important question in science communication.
• A robust dataset that has been analysed critically, intelligently and with care.
• A well-structured report that flows beautifully, forming a convincing argument around your research question.
• A comprehensive, intelligently synthesised and relevant literature review.
• Well explained, well referenced methods.
• Clear and objective reporting of results via appropriate techniques, including professional use of statistics, tables and figures where relevant.
• Nuanced, intelligent and critical interpretation of results and discussion of their implications for the discipline and real life practice, as appropriate, including a discussion of the project's limitations and any recommendations for further research or implementation.
• Professional standard referencing.

Assessment Task 2

Article

800 ±10% word article about your research in style of academic blog post, written as if for The Conversation

Due: Friday, exam week 2

Returned: within 3 weeks from submission

Details of task:

In this assignment you will write about your own research for a more general readership. The assignment involves writing a 800 word (±10%) article in the style expected of academics writing about their research for The Conversation. The idea is to ?sell' your research to the world by showing how it relates to trending current events and/or how it can be applied usefully in practice. To achieve this aim you need to write about your work with appropriate language, style and structure.

Marking criteria

To be eligible for a pass in this assignment:

• The assignment must be 800 words ±10% excluding title and any captions.

What your assignment should ideally demonstrate:

• An article that beautifully captures a conversational style, is engaging to read, flows well and entertains.
• A piece structured appropriately for the target venue.
• Appropriate use of any multi-media elements and style elements relevant to the online medium.
• Medium-appropriate acknowledgement of other people's work and thoughts.
• A persuasive argument that taps into trending current events and/or practical applications of interest to the general readership of The Conversation.

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of our culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically. This means that all members of the community commit to honest and responsible scholarly practice and to upholding these values with respect and fairness. The Australian National University commits to embedding the values of academic integrity in our teaching and learning. We ensure that all members of our community understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with. The University has policies and procedures in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Visit the following Academic honesty & plagiarism website for more information about academic integrity and what the ANU considers academic misconduct. The ANU offers a number of services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. The Academic Skills and Learning Centre offers a number of workshops and seminars that you may find useful for your studies.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Please see individual assesssment items for details

Referencing Requirements

Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.

Returning Assignments

Feedback on assignments 1 and 2 will be emailed back to you.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. The Course Convener may grant extensions for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Resubmission of Assignments

Assignments may not be resubmitted.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

• ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
• ANU Diversity and inclusion for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
• ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
• ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
• ANU Counselling Centre promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
• ANUSA supports and represents undergraduate and ANU College students
• PARSA supports and represents postgraduate and research students