• Class Number 4413
  • Term Code 2930
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 units
  • Mode of Delivery In Person
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • Dr Emily Corner
  • LECTURER
    • Dr Emily Corner
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 25/02/2019
  • Class End Date 31/05/2019
  • Census Date 31/03/2019
  • Last Date to Enrol 04/03/2019
SELT Survey Results

Whilst traditional criminological theories focus on how deviance and crime is constructed, crime science offers a new way of understanding and responding to crime and security problems. This course outlines the distinctive nature of the crime science approach to understanding, preventing, detecting and investigating crime problems. This course presents the key theories that explain the temporal and spatial patterning of crime events, and introduces the associated strategies for disrupting these patterns. This course also emphasises the need for a multidisciplinary approach to address crime and security problems.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

Upon successful completion of this course, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
  1. demonstrate an understanding of the principles and theories of crime science;
  2. source relevant research publications on crime science and environmental criminology, and interpret that information correctly;
  3. critique the value of key theories in explaining criminal behaviour;
  4. use theory and understandings to critically analyse crime prevention approaches; and
  5. critically evaluate operational crime prevention approaches.

Required Resources

The required reading for this course is:

Wortley, Richard & Townsley, Michael. (2017). Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

  • written comments
  • verbal comments
  • feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.

Other Information

Please note, that written assessments which are 10% over/under the word count are penalised by 10% of the possible marks available (i.e. literature review submissions which are below 1350 and above 1650 words and crime script analysis submissions which are below 2700 and above 3300 words will incur a 10% penalty).

Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 What is Crime Science? Course Structure Academic Integrity Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis This week's content will be split over two sessions. Session 1 will be an introductory Echo released on the 28th February. Session 2 will be held in tutorials in Week 2. Readings for Week 1: Wortley, R., & Townsley, M. (2017). Chapter 1: Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis: Situating the Theory, Analytic Approach, and Application. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 1-25), Routledge, London. Laycock, G. (2005). Defining Crime Science. In M. J. Smith & N. Tilley (Eds.). Crime science: New approaches to preventing and detecting crime (pp. 3-26), Routledge, London.
2 The Offender. The Continuum of Criminality Routine Activities Rational Choice Situational Precipitators Readings for Week 2: Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2017). Chapter 2: The Rational Choice Perspective. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 29-61), Routledge, London. Wortley, R. (2017). Chapter 3: Situational Precipitators. In Wortley & Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 62-86), Routledge, London.
3 The Victim. This week, Dr Helen Taylor will be giving the lecture. Routine Activities Rational Choice Repeat Victimisation Readings for Week 3: Felson, M. (2017). Chapter 4: The Routine Activity Approach. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 87-97), Routledge, London. Pease, K., & Farrell, G. (2017). Chapter 9: Repeat Victimisation. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 180-198), Routledge, London.
4 The Environment. The Urban Backcloth Journey to Crime Spatial Choice Geographic Profiling Broken Windows Readings for Week 4: Townsley, M. (2017). Chapter 7: Offender Mobility. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 142-161), Routledge, London. Rossmo, D. K., & Rombouts, S. (2017). Chapter 8: Geographic Profiling. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 162-179), Routledge, London.
5 Crime Patterns. Routine Activities Geometry of Crime Crime Pattern Theory Rational Choice Readings for Week 5: Brantingham, P. J., Brantingham, P. L., & Andresen, M. A. (2017). Chapter 5: The Geometry of Crime and Crime Pattern Theory. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 98-115), Routledge, London. Eck, J., & Weisburd, D. L. (2015). Crime Places in Crime Theory. Crime and Place: Crime Prevention Studies, 4, 1-33.
6 Crime Pattern Analysis. Crime Pattern Theory Geometry of Crime Crime Scripting Spatial Analysis Online Quiz 1 runs this week. This quiz opens 1st April, and closes on 7th April. Readings for Week 6: Leclerc, B. (2017). Chapter 6: Crime Scripts. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 119-141), Routledge, London. Johnson, S. (2017). Chapter 10: Crime Mapping and Spatial Analysis. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 199-223), Routledge, London.
7 No Lecture this week due to Anzac Day (25th April) Tutorials will run as normal on the 23rd April.
8 Enforcement. This week Dr Kelly Hine, an expert in policing will be giving a lecture on the importance of policing in Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis. The written assignment is due on the 29th April. Readings for Week 8: Scott, M. S., Eck, J. E., Knutsson, J., & Goldstein, H. (2017). Chapter 11: Problem Oriented Policing. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 227-258), Routledge, London. Wagers, M., Sousa, W., & Kelling, G. (2017). Chapter 15: Broken Windows. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 334-350), Routledge, London.
9 Situational Crime Prevention. Rational Choice Situational Prevention Broken Windows Defensible Space CPTED Readings for Week 9: Clarke, R. V. (2017). Chapter 13: Situational Crime Prevention. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 286-303), Routledge, London. Guerette, R. T., & Bowers, K. J. (2009). Assessing the Extent of Crime Displacement and Diffusion of Benefits: A Review of Situational Crime Prevention Evaluations. Criminology, 47(4), 1331-1368.
10 Design Against Crime. Rational Choice Broken Windows Defensible Space CPTED Design Against Crime Readings for Week 10: Armitage, R. (2017). Chapter 12: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 259-285), Routledge, London. Ekblom, P. (2017). Chapter 14: Designing Products Against Crime. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis (pp. 304-333), Routledge, London.
11 Crime Prevention in Australia. This week, Dr Helen Taylor will be giving the lecture. Online Quiz 2 runs this week. This quiz opens 20th May, and closes on 26th May. Readings for Week 11: Cherney, A., & Sutton, A. (2007). Crime Prevention in Australia: Beyond 'What Works?' The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 65-81. Indermaur, D. (1999). Situational Prevention of Violent Crime: Theory and Practice in Australia. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 8(1), 71-87.
12 Conclusion and Course Review. Course Review. Exam Preparation. Tutorials this week will be a revision session.

Tutorial Registration

Please register for tutorials on the Wattle page

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Due Date Return of assessment Learning Outcomes
Online Quiz 1 (10%) 10 % 07/04/2019 07/04/2019 1,2
Online Quiz 2 (10%) 10 % 26/05/2019 26/05/2019 1,2
Written Assignment (40%) 40 % 29/04/2019 24/05/2019 1,2,3,4,5
Final Exam (40%) 40 % 31/05/2019 04/07/2019 1,2,3,4,5

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the ANU Online website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Examination(s)

The final exam comprises an unseen examination paper lasting 3 hours and 15 minutes (inclusive of reading time). 

The exam will run in the final exam period (Date TBC).

Assessment Task 1

Value: 10 %
Due Date: 07/04/2019
Return of Assessment: 07/04/2019
Learning Outcomes: 1,2

Online Quiz 1 (10%)

Online Quiz

This is the first of two online quizzes during the semester, the questions will be centred around the crime and security analyses introduced in Weeks 1-4. The questions are equally weighted across lecture material and required readings.

The quiz is not timed, you will have between 00:01 on the 1st April and 23:59 on the 7th April to complete the quiz and submit your answers.

You are only able to make one attemptat the quiz. You cannot retake the quiz.

When you have completed the quiz, you will need to make sure to press ‘submit’ to record your answers. Otherwise your answers will not be recorded and will receive no mark.

Feedback will be provided on return of results.

Assessment Task 2

Value: 10 %
Due Date: 26/05/2019
Return of Assessment: 26/05/2019
Learning Outcomes: 1,2

Online Quiz 2 (10%)

Online Quiz

This is the second of two online quizzes during the semester, the questions will be centred around the responding to crime and security problems introduced in Weeks 7-10. The questions are equally weighted across lecture material and required readings.

The quiz is not timed, you will have between 00:01 on the 20th May and 23:59 on the 26th May to complete the quiz and submit your answers.

You are only able to make one attemptat the quiz. You cannot retake the quiz.

When you have completed the quiz, you will need to make sure to press ‘submit’ to record your answers. Otherwise your answers will not be recorded and will receive no mark.

Feedback will be provided on return of results.

Assessment Task 3

Value: 40 %
Due Date: 29/04/2019
Return of Assessment: 24/05/2019
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5

Written Assignment (40%)

Written Assignment

Assessment Task 4 will require students to write a literature review (1500 words) on offender decision making processes and offender modus operandi for a specific crime type, and complete a crime script analysis of a related crime event (3000 words).

This assignment will require students to demonstrate their knowledge of theories within crime science and environmental criminology, and explain theoretical approaches to implementation of effective prevention techniques. 


Literature Review

Select one of the following crimes and write a 1500-word literature review on the type of crime.

The literature review use ECCA to explain the occurrence of the case study under scrutiny.

You should use a variety of sources to back up your argument.

  • Sexual Offences
  • Organised Crime
  • Lone Actor Terrorism


Crime Script Analysis

Using the crime type you chose for your literature review, find a real life case study of an incidence of this crime type.

You are to use your chosen case study to build a crime script of the offence, including a brief timeline (500 words) of the case.  

Alongside the crime script, you are to also include a critical analyses of the potential intervention points for prevention.


Please note, that written assessments which are 10% over/under the word count are penalised by 10% of the possible marks available (i.e. literature review submissions which are below 1350 and above 1650 words and crime script analysis submissions which are below 2700 and above 3300 words will incur a 10% penalty).

Rubric

Assessment ElementHigh DistinctionDistinctionCreditPassFail

Literature Review - Theory

Demonstrated ability to understand all aspects of the topic, key concepts, and theory. 

Demonstrated ability to understand most aspects of the topic, key concepts, and theory. 

Demonstrated ability to understand some aspects of the topic, key concepts, and theory. 

Demonstrated ability to understand minimal aspects of the topic, key concepts, and theory. 

No demonstrated ability to understand aspects of the topic, key concepts, and theory. 

Literature Review - Sources

Ability to locate a wide range of appropriate sources, identify and connect theory to case under scrutiny.

Ability to locate a range of appropriate sources, identify and connect theory to case under scrutiny.

Ability to locate a narrow range of appropriate sources, identify and connect theory to case under scrutiny.

Ability to locate one or two appropriate sources, identify and connect theory to case under scrutiny.

No ability to locate appropriate sources, identify or connect theory to case under scrutiny.

Literature Review - Evaluation

Identifies and comprehensively critically evaluates strengths and limitations of the case specific prevention approach along with the effectiveness of its implications to the relevant case. 

Identifies and critically evaluates strengths and limitations of the case specific prevention approach along with the effectiveness of its implications to the relevant case. 

Identifies strengths and limitations of the case specific prevention approach along with the effectiveness of its implications to the relevant case. 

Identifies strengths and limitations of the case specific prevention approach.

Fails to identify or evaluate strengths and limitations of the case specific prevention approach along with the effectiveness of its implications to the relevant case. 

Literature Review - Argument

Review draws from multiple high quality sources of information to demonstrate the breadth and strength of research, synthesises the relevant literature to mount a coherent and logical argument. 

Review draws from multiple quality sources of information to demonstrate the breadth and strength of research, synthesises the relevant literature to mount a coherent and logical argument.

Review draws from multiple sources of information to demonstrate the breadth and strength of research, synthesises the relevant literature to mount a coherent and logical argument.

Review draws from few sources of information to demonstrate the breadth and strength of research, synthesises the relevant literature to mount a coherent and logical argument.

Review does not draw from sources of information to demonstrate the breadth and strength of research, synthesises the relevant literature to mount a coherent and logical argument.

Literature Review - Presentation

The chosen format for the presentation of information is easy to follow and well organised. 

Clear and readable in terms of written expression; uses an objective and professional tone; avoids overuse of quotes.

Fully adheres to APA formatting with appropriate in- text referencing and reference list. 

The chosen format for the presentation of information is easy to follow and well organised. 

Clear and readable in terms of written expression; uses an objective and professional tone; avoids overuse of quotes.

Minor issues with APA formatting.

The chosen format for the presentation of information is easy to follow. 

Readable in terms of written expression; avoids overuse of quotes.

Some issues with APA formatting.

Mid-range in terms of written expression.

Major issues with APA formatting.

Poor written presentation.

Difficult to follow and does not use professional tone.

Over-use of quotes.

Does not adhere to APA formatting with appropriate in- text referencing and reference list. 

Crime Script - Theory

Demonstrated ability to understand all aspects of the topic, key concepts, and theory.

Demonstrated ability to understand most aspects of the topic, key concepts, and theory. 

Demonstrated ability to understand some aspects of the topic, key concepts, and theory. 

Demonstrated ability to understand minimal aspects of the topic, key concepts, and theory. 

No demonstrated ability to understand aspects of the topic, key concepts, and theory. 

Crime Script - Sources

Ability to locate a wide range of appropriate quality sources, identify and connect theory to case under scrutiny.

Ability to locate a range of appropriate sources, identify and connect theory to case under scrutiny.

Ability to locate a narrow range of appropriate sources, identify and connect theory to case under scrutiny.

Ability to locate one or two appropriate sources, identify and connect theory to case under scrutiny.

No ability to locate appropriate sources, identify or connect theory to case under scrutiny.

Crime Script - Script Development

Coherent and logical depiction of crime script.

Minor formatting issues in crime script.

Missing information within script that was available in case study.

Basic depiction of crime script, lack of information that was available in case study.

Major errors within crime script.

Crime Script - Argument

Mounts a critical argument which demonstrates a clear understanding of the potential intervention points for prevention. 

Mounts a critical argument which demonstrates a basic understanding of the potential intervention points for prevention. 

Offers a demonstration an understanding of the potential intervention points for prevention. 

Poor demonstration of an understanding of the potential intervention points for prevention.

No demonstration of an understanding of the potential intervention points for prevention.

Crime Script - Presentation

The chosen format for the presentation of information is easy to follow and well organised. 

Clear and readable in terms of written expression; uses an objective and professional tone; avoids overuse of quotes.

Adheres to APA formatting with appropriate in- text referencing and reference list. 

The chosen format for the presentation of information is easy to follow and well organised. 

Clear and readable in terms of written expression; uses an objective and professional tone; avoids overuse of quotes.

Minor issues with APA formatting.

The chosen format for the presentation of information is easy to follow. 

Readable in terms of written expression; avoids overuse of quotes.

Some issues with APA formatting.

Mid-range in terms of written expression.

Major issues with APA formatting.

Poor written presentation.

Difficult to follow and does not use professional tone.

Over-use of quotes.

Does not adhere to APA formatting with appropriate in- text referencing and reference list. 

Assessment Task 4

Value: 40 %
Due Date: 31/05/2019
Return of Assessment: 04/07/2019
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5

Final Exam (40%)

Exam

The final exam comprises an unseen examination paper lasting 3 hours and 15 minutes (inclusive of reading time). 

The exam will run in the final exam period (Date TBC).

The exam is designed to assess students understanding of knowledge, critical thinking, and application of theory as introduced in this course.

Students will be provided with two exam questions per lecture in Weeks 2-11 (18 questions).

The exam will consist of 10 of these questions.

Student will have to answer 6 of the 10 questions.


The following includes a list of examination rules:

No electronic aids (e.g. laptops, smartphones, Internet-enabled devices, etc.) are permitted in the exam.

No materials (e.g. books, notes, etc.) are permitted.

Use of an unannotated paper-based dictionary is permitted for candidates with prior written approval from the Convenor. 

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of our culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically. This means that all members of the community commit to honest and responsible scholarly practice and to upholding these values with respect and fairness. The Australian National University commits to embedding the values of academic integrity in our teaching and learning. We ensure that all members of our community understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with. The University has policies and procedures in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Visit the following Academic honesty & plagiarism website for more information about academic integrity and what the ANU considers academic misconduct. The ANU offers a number of services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. The Academic Skills and Learning Centre offers a number of workshops and seminars that you may find useful for your studies.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.

Returning Assignments

Assignments will be returned on the dates indicated. Delays may occur in exceptional circumstances.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. The Course Convener may grant extensions for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Resubmission of Assignments

Not Applicable

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

Dr Emily Corner
u1054422@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Dr Emily Corner

Tuesday 00:00 00:00
Dr Emily Corner
Emily.corner@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Dr Emily Corner

Tuesday 00:00 00:00

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions