• Class Number 3798
  • Term Code 2930
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 units
  • Mode of Delivery In Person
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • Dr Stephen Loy
  • LECTURER
    • Alexander Hunter
    • Dr Stephen Loy
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 25/02/2019
  • Class End Date 31/05/2019
  • Census Date 31/03/2019
  • Last Date to Enrol 04/03/2019
SELT Survey Results

A distinguishing characteristic of research in the creative arts, including performance, composition, and the creative aspects of music technology, is that the outputs of the research can be creative outputs, such as a recital, or a portfolio of compositions, or a new technological process. This course provides all researchers in music with an introduction to the theories and methods underpinning creative practice as research, drawing on written studies on creative practice as research, exegeses, creative outputs, and case studies. It will provide understandings and tools for the writing of an exegesis.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

Upon successful completion of this course, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
1. Understand and articulate the concept of creative practice as research;
2. Critically evaluate the writings of others on creative practice;
3. Analyse, using a range of theories and methods, a range of creative outputs as research outputs; and
4. Articulate, both orally and in writing, the original contribution of those creative outputs.

Required Resources

Resources, including weekly readings and listening examples, will be made available via the course website.

Robert Burke and Andrys Onsmanm eds., Perspectives on Artistic Research in Music. Lanham: Lexington, 2017.

Mine Dogantan-Dack ed., Artistic Practice as Research in Music: Theory, Criticism, Practice. London: Routledge, 2015.

Elizabeth Haddon and Pamela Burnard eds, Creative Teaching for Creative Learning in Higher Music Education

Sang-Hie Lee, Scholarly Research for Musicians. London: Routledge, 2017.

Hazel Smith and Roger T. Dean eds, Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.

Sophie Stevance and Serge Lacasse, Research-Creation in Music and the Arts. London: Routledge, 2018.

Staff Feedback

Formal written feedback will be provided for Assessment Tasks 1, 2 and 3. Informal feedback, in verbal form, will be provided on Assessment task 4. Informal feedback, via consultation with the Course Convenor, is available throughout the semester.

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.

Other Information

The schedule of topics may be amended, subject to the availability of guests.

Referencing and bibliographic entries should be formatted in Chicago Style. References should be provided in footnotes, not in-text references. References should be provided wherever material from another source has been used. This includes:

  • Direct quotations of the words of another writer
  • The paraphrasing of the ideas of another writer
  • Summaries of arguments presented by another writer

For details on the formatting of footnotes and bibliographic entries, consult the following:

  • The Chicago Manual of Style Online, “Chicago-Style Citation Quick Guide,” University of Chicago, 2007. http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html
  • ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre website: https://academicskills.anu.edu.au/

Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 What is research? Exploring theories of knowledge.
2 Creative practice in the arts: Types of practice and their purposes
3 Creative practice and research: Practice-based and Practice-led research
4 Practice Research in an Institutional Context: Motivations, Purposes and Outcomes
5 Autoethnography and Creative Practice Research
6 Reflexive Practice in Creative Arts Research Task 1
7 Performance and Research
8 Recording Practice and Research
9 Composition as Research 1
10 Composition as Research 2
11 Creative Practice as Research in the Visual Arts
12 Student Presentations Task 2
13 Examination Period Task 3

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Due Date Return of assessment Learning Outcomes
Essay 1 30 % 07/04/2019 21/04/2019 1, 2
Presentation 20 % 02/06/2019 16/06/2019 4
Essay 2 40 % 09/06/2019 25/06/2019 1, 3, 4
Class Participation 10 % 02/06/2019 16/06/2019 1, 2, 3, 4

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the ANU Online website. Students may choose not to submit assessment items through Turnitin. In this instance you will be required to submit, alongside the assessment item itself, hard copies of all references included in the assessment item.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

Participation is worth 10% of the final grade.

Assessment Task 1

Value: 30 %
Due Date: 07/04/2019
Return of Assessment: 21/04/2019
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2

Essay 1

Analysis of one or more writings of others on creative practice as research

In this short essay, you are required to provide an analysis of an aspect of the critical discourse concerning creative practice as research. You are to choose one or more written articles or chapters which contribute to this discourse, and to analyse the writer’s perspective and arguments regarding how creative practice may be understood as research.

Further details regarding this assessment task will be provided in the first weeks of semester.

Word limit: 1500 words

Due Date: 7 April 2019

Value: 30%

Presentation requirements: Bibliography and footnotes to be formatted in Chicago style.

Estimated return date: Two weeks after submission

Assessment Criteria:

This assessment task will be marked on the basis of:

  • Demonstrated understanding of the chosen work/s
  • Demonstrated ability to apply relevant theories and concepts relating to creative practice research in the analysis of the chosen work/s
  • The development of cohesive, clear and substantiated arguments in relation to the chosen work/s and their contribution to the discourse on creative practice research
  • The quality of academic writing and referencing
  • The framing of your arguments within the broader context of the topics and issues covered in the course

Rubric

HD [80-100] Work of exceptional qualityD [70-79] Work of superior qualityCR [60-69] Work of good qualityP [50-59] Work of satisfactory qualityN [0-49]

Criteria 1

Demonstrated understanding of the chosen work/s

Criteria 2

Demonstrated ability to apply relevant theories and concepts relating to creative practice research in the analysis of the chosen work/s

Criteria 3

The development of cohesive, clear and substantiated arguments in relation to the chosen work/s and their contribution to the discourse on creative practice research

Criteria 4

The quality of academic writing and referencing

Criteria 5

The framing of your arguments within the broader context of the topics and issues covered in the course

Assessment Task 2

Value: 20 %
Due Date: 02/06/2019
Return of Assessment: 16/06/2019
Learning Outcomes: 4

Presentation

You are to give a 10-15 minute presentation on creative practice as research, followed by 5 minutes of questions. Your presentation may concern any aspect of creative practice as research, and may be guided by your own research interests and creative practice.

Further details regarding this assessment task will be provided in the first weeks of semester.

Due Date: 2 June 2019

Value: 20%

Presentation requirements: The presentation is to be given verbally, in person. You may choose to incorporate aspects of your creative practice into your presentation.

Estimated return date: Two weeks after submission

Assessment Criteria:

This assessment task will be marked on the basis of:

  • Demonstrated ability to draw on relevant theories and concepts in your discussion of creative practice research
  • Development of cohesive, clear and substantiated arguments regarding creative practice research
  • The quality of presentation delivery
  • The ability to appropriately respond to questions and engage in discussion regarding theories and concepts relating to creative practice research

Rubric

HD [80-100] Work of exceptional qualityD [70-79] Work of superior qualityCR [60-69] Work of good qualityP [50-59] Work of satisfactory qualityN [0-49]

Criteria 1

Demonstrated ability to draw on relevant theories and concepts in your discussion of creative practice research

Criteria 2

Development of cohesive, clear and substantiated arguments regarding creative practice research

Criteria 3

The quality of presentation delivery

Criteria 4

The ability to appropriately respond to questions and engage in discussion regarding theories and concepts relating to creative practice research

Assessment Task 3

Value: 40 %
Due Date: 09/06/2019
Return of Assessment: 25/06/2019
Learning Outcomes: 1, 3, 4

Essay 2

Analysis of one or more works of published creative output as research outputs

This assessment task requires you to choose one or more published creative works, and provide an analysis of how these works may be understood as research. Your analysis should draw on theoretical approaches considered during the semester.

Further details regarding this assessment task will be provided in the first weeks of semester.

Due Date: 9 June 2019

Word limit: 2000 words

Value: 40%

Presentation requirements: Bibliography and footnotes to be formatted in Chicago style.

Estimated return date: Two weeks after submission

Assessment Criteria:

This assessment task will be marked on the basis of:

  • Demonstrated understanding of the chosen work/s and their contribution to research through practice
  • Demonstrated ability to apply relevant theories and concepts relating to creative practice research in the analysis of the chosen work/s
  • The development of cohesive, clear and substantiated arguments in relation to the chosen work/s and their contribution to the discourse on creative practice research
  • The quality of academic writing and referencing
  • The framing of your arguments within the broader context of the topics and issues covered in the course 

Rubric

HD [80-100] Work of exceptional qualityD [70-79] Work of superior qualityCR [60-69] Work of good qualityP [50-59] Work of satisfactory qualityN [0-49]

Criteria 1

Demonstrated understanding of the chosen work/s and their contribution to research through practice

Criteria 2

Demonstrated ability to apply relevant theories and concepts relating to creative practice research in the analysis of the chosen work/s

Criteria 3

The development of cohesive, clear and substantiated arguments in relation to the chosen work/s and their contribution to the discourse on creative practice research

Criteria 4

The quality of academic writing and referencing

Criteria 5

The framing of your arguments within the broader context of the topics and issues covered in the course

Assessment Task 4

Value: 10 %
Due Date: 02/06/2019
Return of Assessment: 16/06/2019
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 3, 4

Class Participation

This component of the assessment of the course evaluates your participation in seminar discussions and other class activities. This includes your engagement with set reading and listening for each seminar.

Value: 10%

Assessment Criteria:

This assessment task will be marked on the basis of:

  • Active and engaged participation in seminar topic discussions
  • Demonstrated engagement with course materials, including set readings and listening examples

Rubric

HD [80-100] Work of exceptional qualityD [70-79] Work of superior qualityCR [60-69] Work of good qualityP [50-59] Work of satisfactory qualityN [0-49]

Criteria 1

Active and engaged participation in seminar topic discussions

Criteria 2

Demonstrated engagement with course materials, including set readings and listening examples

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of our culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically. This means that all members of the community commit to honest and responsible scholarly practice and to upholding these values with respect and fairness. The Australian National University commits to embedding the values of academic integrity in our teaching and learning. We ensure that all members of our community understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with. The University has policies and procedures in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Visit the following Academic honesty & plagiarism website for more information about academic integrity and what the ANU considers academic misconduct. The ANU offers a number of services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. The Academic Skills and Learning Centre offers a number of workshops and seminars that you may find useful for your studies.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) as submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.

Returning Assignments

Marked assessment tasks will be returned in class or electronically, as appropriate.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. The Course Convener may grant extensions for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

Dr Stephen Loy
stephen.loy@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Music analysis; Western art music of the 19th and 20th centuries; Popular music studies.

Dr Stephen Loy

Tuesday 09:00 11:00
Alexander Hunter
02 6125 3866
Alexander.Hunter@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Alexander Hunter

Monday 11:00 17:00
Dr Stephen Loy
02 6125 7635
Stephen.Loy@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Dr Stephen Loy

Tuesday 09:00 11:00

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions