- Class Number 9932
- Term Code 2960
- Class Info
- Unit Value 6 to 24 units
- Mode of Delivery In Person
- Dr Susanna Scarparo
- Class Dates
- Class Start Date 22/07/2019
- Class End Date 25/10/2019
- Census Date 31/08/2019
- Last Date to Enrol 29/07/2019
All ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences Master Advanced programs require the completion of a 24 unit thesis. THES8102 is the thesis course for the following Master (Advanced) programs:
Arts specialising in English,
Art History and Curatorial Studies,
General and Applied Linguistics, and
Students in this course carry out advanced research on a question of their choice. Their topic is agreed with their thesis supervisor and approved by their masters convenor. Students design and implement a project to answer their research question, to place the answer in the context of an intellectual tradition, and to communicate it clearly to others.
Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
Upon successful completion of this course, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
- pose a significant research question relating to their
- investigate this question creatively, critically,
ethically, and independently, including through sophisticated use of
appropriate theory and methodology as appropriate to the discipline, and place
these investigations in the context of the relevant intellectual tradition; and
- communicate their research and its findings through an appropriate medium.
No field trips are required to complete the thesis. Depending on the chosen thesis topic and the agreement of the thesis supervisor, some students may choose to undertake a field trip as part of their research.
Additional Course Costs
Students are responsible for the costs of producing hard copies of their thesis for examination.
Your discipline’s Masters convenor or thesis supervisor may recommend resources specific to your discipline or research.
Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:
• Thesis supervisors will comment orally and/or in writing on ideas and on drafts of written material
ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.
Recycling of material
Recycling “is the submission for assessment of work which, wholly or in large part, has been previously presented by the same student for another assessment, either at the Australian National University or elsewhere” (https://services.anu.edu.au/education-support/academic-integrity/determining-a-potential-breach). If each of the following two conditions are met, students may include in this course material that has been submitted for assessment in other 8000-level courses that are available in the program for which they are enrolled:
- the 8000-level course from which material is being recycled states that material submitted in that course may be incorporated into the assessment for THES8102 Thesis; AND
- the acknowledgments or introduction of the thesis clearly identifies the title of the assessment/s and name of the course/s from which material is being recycled, and an indication of the extent of the recycling.
|Week/Session||Summary of Activities||Assessment|
|1||A total of 520 hours, including a minimum of 12 hours contact with the supervisor. It is the joint responsibility of the student and supervisor to arrange times for face-to-face contact. The supervisor is normally only available for consultation during teaching weeks of each semester.||The thesis is the sole piece of assessment for this course; to successfully complete this course, it must demonstrate all learning outcomes for the course (LO1-3).|
|Assessment task||Value||Due Date||Return of assessment||Learning Outcomes|
* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details
ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:
The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the ANU Online website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.
Moderation of Assessment
Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.
1. Schools/Centres are responsible for the examination procedure.
2. The thesis will initially be examined by at least two examiners; neither examiner should be the Supervisor or a staff member who has given extensive advice. At least one examiner must have a high level of expertise in the research methodology used. Schools may decide whether or not any of the examiners should be external. Examiners will use the CASS Marking Guide to assign each thesis to a grade and mark. In addition, examiners will be requested to write a detailed report as feedback and guidance for the student.
3. The identity of an examiner will not be disclosed to the student unless the examiner gives written permission for this to happen.
4. Direct contact between the student and/or supervisor with any examiner of the student’s thesis about the thesis and its examination at any time between the appointment of the examiner and the finalisation of the mark is prohibited. The relevant Honours or Masters Convenor may, at the request of an examiner, provide further information about the thesis or, in the case of joint work, the student's contribution to the thesis. In cases where the Convenor is also the Supervisor, the Head of School or nominee will manage the examination process.
5. After the two examiners have examined the thesis, they are required to discuss marks (obligatory). However if they are not able to agree on a single mark, they will submit their separate marks.
6. Once the two examiners’ reports have been received, all Honours and Masters Programs must hold an examiners meeting prior to submission of Thesis results to the Student Office to determine the final Honours or Masters result.
7. The composition of members of examiners meetings should be at the discretion of each discipline/program in consultation with the relevant Head of School.
8. If examiners agree on a mark, then this mark would be accepted unless after consideration at the examiners’ meeting it is agreed that a different mark would be justified. A written case for the different mark, based on the same grounds as outlined in the Special Consideration Guideline and the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy, is made to the delegate (Head of School).
- A student may, of course, apply for Special Consideration (centrally), and the written case should also account for any student Special Consideration application.
- NB: A student Special Consideration application will not be admissible if the student was already granted an extension on the same grounds (no ‘double dipping’).
9. If examiners don’t agree on a mark, then:
I. if the marks are more than 10 marks apart, the thesis is sent to a third examiner. In determining the final thesis mark all three examiners’ marks and reports must be taken into consideration (as in the Research Awards Rules for PhDs).
II. if the marks are less than 10 marks apart, they are weighed up in discussion between the Honours Convenor and Delegated Authority (usually Head of School), who will then make a written submission to the School’s examiners meeting. The process must be based exclusively on academic judgement and an explanation given, rather than a simple administrative average.
For 8 and 9 it is noted that:
• In determining the final result, the examiners’ meeting cannot change coursework results and they cannot change the weightings of coursework and theses.
Assessment Task 1
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3
The length of the thesis is a maximum of 20,000 words exclusive of footnotes, tables, figures, maps, bibliography, and appendices. There is a penalty of 10% for exceeding this word limit.
Additional requirements are set out in the annual CASS Masters (Advanced) and Honours Guide. In the case of any inconsistency between http://programsandcourses.anu.edu.au and the CASS Masters (Advanced) and Honours Guide, http://programsandcourses.anu.edu.au takes precedence.
Presentation requirements: see the CASS Masters (Advanced) AND Honours Guide for further details.
Title page. The first page should indicate the title of the thesis, the degree (and Honours Specialisation, if in the Bachelor of Arts) being completed, the University, the candidate’s name and the month and year of submission. It should state: “This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of XXXXX in the College of Arts and Social Sciences.”
The second page. The second page should state: “I hereby declare that, except where it is otherwise acknowledged in the text, this thesis represents my own original work.” The second page should also state: “All versions of the submitted thesis (regardless of submission type) are identical.” This is where you can also put in a statement about recycling of material.
A signed statement relating to Human Research Ethics. If required
Table of contents / figures / tables / plates
Bibliography/References. The system of referencing can vary in the College, so you must check with your Supervisor.
Appendices. If required
Please talk with your Supervisor or Convenor if you are unsure of what any of these elements are. The following guidelines have been adopted by the ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences for the presentation of theses, and you are advised to follow them where possible:
- The paper layout should be A4 size, with the text double –spaced.
- Pages should be numbered consecutively.
- Left hand 40mm
- Right hand 35mm
- Top 30mm
- Bottom 30mm
Where your discipline or School requires hard copy to be submitted, the following also applies:
- Check with your Program Convenor as to whether a hard copy is required, and if so, how many.
- Any method of duplication may be used that gives a clear, clean copy.
90% - 100%
Work of exceptional quality demonstrating a high level of originality, and making a fundamental contribution to the field. There is very little the student could have done additionally or alternatively. The thesis suggests outstanding potential for future research work.
80% - 89%
Work of exceptional quality showing clear understanding of subject matter and appreciation of issues; well formulated; arguments sustained; relevant literature referenced; marked evidence of creative ability and originality; high level of intellectual work. The thesis suggests excellent potential for future research work.
70% - 79%
Work of good quality showing strong grasp of subject matter and appreciation of dominant issues though not necessarily of the finer points; arguments clearly developed; relevant literature referenced; evidence of creative ability; solid intellectual work. The thesis suggests good potential for future research work.
60% - 69%
Work of solid quality showing competent understanding of subject matter and appreciation of main issues though possibly with some lapses and inadequacies; arguments clearly developed and supported by references though possibly with minor red herrings and loose ends; some evidence of creative ability; well prepared and presented. The thesis suggests limited potential for future research work.
50% - 59%
Range from a bare pass to a safe pass. Adequate, but lacking breadth and depth. Work generally has gaps. Frequently work of this grade takes a simple factual approach and does not attempt to interpret the findings. At the lower end, indicates a need for considerable effort to achieve improvement. The thesis suggests little potential for future research work.
Unsatisfactory. This grade characterises work that shows a lack of understanding of the topic. Inadequate in degree of relevance and/or completeness. The thesis does not suggest any potential for future research work.
Academic integrity is a core part of our culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically. This means that all members of the community commit to honest and responsible scholarly practice and to upholding these values with respect and fairness. The Australian National University commits to embedding the values of academic integrity in our teaching and learning. We ensure that all members of our community understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with. The University has policies and procedures in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Visit the following Academic honesty & plagiarism website for more information about academic integrity and what the ANU considers academic misconduct. The ANU offers a number of services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. The Academic Skills and Learning Centre offers a number of workshops and seminars that you may find useful for your studies.
Assignments are submitted using Turnitin in the course Wattle site. You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records.
Many disciplines additionally require the submission of hard copies; contact your discipline’s Honours convenor for whether or not this requirement applies to your discipline. Assignments must include the cover sheet available here. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.
Under special circumstances, students may apply for an extension of time to submit their thesis or equivalent work (music notes, portfolio etc.).
An extension of time for submission of thesis and equivalent work is granted only under exceptional circumstances at the discretion of the Associate Dean (Student Experience).
Applications for extension must be made using the CASS Honours and Masters thesis extension form.
Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.
Theses are returned though your School/Centre office.
Extensions and Penalties
Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. The Course Convener may grant extensions for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.
Resubmission of Assignments
The thesis may not be resubmitted.
Distribution of grades policy
Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.
Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.
Support for students
The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).
- ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
- ANU Diversity and inclusion for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
- ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
- ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
- ANU Counselling Centre promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
- ANUSA supports and represents undergraduate and ANU College students
- PARSA supports and represents postgraduate and research students