The course covers aspects of the law of restitution as it has developed in Australia, England and (to a lesser extent) Canada, and considers the inter-relationship between restitution, contract, equity, and other categories of legal obligations.

The course considers the relevant law from three perspectives: historical, conceptual and doctrinal.  It provides a useful overview of the private law of obligations and property.  The first section of the course considers:

    the history of restitution; and
    theories of restitution and the concept of unjust enrichment

The second part of the course examines various situations where restitutionary relief may be sought including:

    mistake (including its role as the paradigm unjust enrighment claim);
    ineffective contracts;
    restitution after breach of contract;
    compulsion;
    restitution for wrongs;
    property and restitution;
    equity and restitution; and
    other topical issues.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

1. Evaluate hypothetical problems and apply law relevant to topics covered in the course
2. Research, critically evaluate and contribute to the theoretical debates concerning the structure, content and methodology of the law of Restitution;
3. Integrate social, comparative or interdisciplinary approaches into analysis of the law of restitution
4. Evaluate the relationship of the law of Restitution to other categories of the law of obligations and to Equity, synthesise knowledge, and present findings in these areas of law.

Research-Led Teaching

Pauline Ridge researches in equity, restitution and contract law. Her research in these areas informs the teaching of this course.

Required Resources

There is no prescribed text book. The Course Reading Guide/E Brick (access via WATTLE) provides links to the prescribed readings.

Recommended Resources

Kit Barker and Ross Grantham, Unjust Enrichment (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2nd ed, 2018) contains helpful extracts of many of the primary and secondary sources referred to in the course.

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

• written comments on assessment
• verbal comments in class and in student consultations
• feedback to whole class

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.

Class Schedule

Week/Session	Summary of Activities	Assessment
1	Introduction to Restitution Law
2	The Mistaken Payment Claim	Optional in-class online revision task
3	Defences	Optional in-class online revision task
4	Coercion
5	Coercion
6	Legal Problem-Solving Skills Workshop
7	Unjust Enrichment Theory	Optional in-class online revision task
8	Equity and Restitution
9	Equity and Restitution	Optional in-class online revision task
10	Ineffective Contracts; Essay Writing Workshop
11	Ineffective Contracts	Optional in-class online revision task
12	Necessitous Intervention	Optional in-class online revision task

Assessment Summary

Assessment task	Value	Due Date	Return of assessment	Learning Outcomes
Optional in-class online revision tasks	0 %	*	*	1,3,4
Research Essay I	50 %	28/04/2020	07/05/2020	1,2,3,4
Research Essay II	50 %	02/06/2020	09/07/2020	2,3,4

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

• Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure
• Special Assessment Consideration Policy and General Information 
• Student Surveys and Evaluations
• Deferred Examinations
• Student Complaint Resolution Policy and Procedure

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the ANU Online website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

The workload expectation for each six-unit course at the ANU is 10 hours per week

Assessment Task 1

Optional in-class online revision tasks

Brief Details: students in this course may choose to attempt any of the six online revision tasks set for the undergraduate version of this course (made available in class in Weeks 2, 3, 7, 9, 11 and 12). The in-class online tasks will comprise a mix of true/false quizzes, short answer questions and learning reflections. They will assess understanding of the taught content and set readings for the classes in which they occur and provide you with feedback about your understanding of course content without any effect on your final grades.

Nature of Task: Optional.

Weighting: 0%

Release: Weeks 2, 3, 7, 9, 11 and 12 during the face to face class.

Due date: at the end of the respective class.

Estimated return date: within two weeks of the respective class. It is expected that most in-class assessment tasks will be marked immediately.

Assessment Criteria:

• accuracy of understanding of relevant law;
• where applicable, accurate application of law to a factual scenario, including a reasoned conclusion;
• where applicable, clarity and persuasiveness of critical evaluation of relevant law;
• where applicable, evidence and depth of self-reflection on learning.

Assessment Task 2

Research Essay I

Brief Details: You are to engage in independent research and critical reflection of a theoretical and/or doctrinal nature on one of the topics listed on WATTLE and write an essay which sets out the findings of your research and the outcomes of your reflection. The essay should demonstrate the ability to carry out substantial research (beyond the course materials) and present a well-reasoned legal argument.

Nature of Task: compulsory and non-redeemable. Non completion of this task will result in a mark of 0 for the task.

Weighting: 50%

Word limit: 3,000 words.

Release: essay questions will be available on the WATTLE course page by 5pm on Friday, 7 March (Week 2 of semester).

Due date: 5pm, Tuesday, 28 April 2020 via Turnitin on WATTLE. Late submission without an extension is permitted, but default late penalties will apply.

Estimated return date: on or before 7 May 2020.

Assessment Criteria: Essays will be assessed against the standards of: ‘not demonstrated’; ‘satisfactory’; ‘good’, ‘very good’ or ‘excellent’ in relation to:

• Independent Research: extent (an appropriate range of primary and secondary sources that are relevant to the topic), depth and appropriateness.
• Response to question: cogency, breadth, depth, coherence, engagement with the issues posed by the topic, independence, understanding and interpretation of the sources. The essay should be presented as a logical argument which addresses all the issues relevant to the question asked.
• Structure: essays should be well structured and appropriate headings should be used to break up the text and enhance the flow of reasoning. The essay must include a brief introduction and an appropriate conclusion.
• Written expression: fluency, intelligibility, compliance with conventions of spelling and grammar.
• Citation and referencing: adequacy, accuracy and consistency.

Assessment Task 3

Research Essay II

Brief Details: You are to engage in independent research and critical reflection of a theoretical and/or doctrinal nature on one of the topics listed on WATTLE and write an essay which sets out the findings of your research and the outcomes of your reflection. The essay should demonstrate the ability to carry out substantial research (beyond the course materials) and present a well-reasoned legal argument.

Nature of Task: Compulsory and non-redeemable. Non completion of this task will result in a mark of 0 for the task.

Weighting: 50%.

Word limit: 3,000 words. Do not include the bibliography in the word count.

Release: Essay questions will be available on the WATTLE course page by 5pm on Friday, 7 March (Week 2 of semester).

Due date: 5pm on Monday, 2 June 2020 via Turnitin. Late submissions (without an extension) are permitted, although late penalties will apply.

Estimated return date: On release of final course results.

Assessment Criteria:

Essays will be assessed against the standards of: ‘not demonstrated’; ‘satisfactory’; ‘good’, ‘very good’ or ‘excellent’ in relation to:

• Independent Research: extent (an appropriate range of primary and secondary sources that are relevant to the topic), depth and appropriateness.
• Response to question: cogency, breadth, depth, coherence, engagement with the issues posed by the topic, independence, understanding and interpretation of the sources. The essay should be presented as a logical argument which addresses all the issues relevant to the question asked.
• Structure: essays should be well structured and appropriate headings should be used to break up the text and enhance the flow of reasoning. The essay must include a brief introduction and an appropriate conclusion.
• Written expression: fluency, intelligibility, compliance with conventions of spelling and grammar.
• Citation and referencing: adequacy, accuracy and consistency.

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically, committing to honest and responsible scholarly practice and upholding these values with respect and fairness.

The ANU commits to assisting all members of our community to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle and Academic Misconduct Rule, uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with.

The Academic Misconduct Rule is in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Very minor breaches of the academic integrity principle may result in a reduction of marks of up to 10% of the total marks available for the assessment. The ANU offers a number of online and in person services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. Visit the Academic Skills website for more information about academic integrity, your responsibilities and for assistance with your assignments, writing skills and study.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

Hard copy submission is not required in this course.

Late Submission

Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:

• Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
• Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

• ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
• ANU Diversity and inclusion for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
• ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
• ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
• ANU Counselling Centre promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
• ANUSA supports and represents undergraduate and ANU College students
• PARSA supports and represents postgraduate and research students