- Class Number 6391
- Term Code 3050
- Class Info
- Unit Value 6 to 12 units
- Mode of Delivery In Person
- AsPr Brian Billups
- AsPr Brian Billups
- Class Dates
- Class Start Date 01/07/2020
- Class End Date 30/09/2020
- Census Date 24/07/2020
- Last Date to Enrol 24/07/2020
This course allows guided research on a neuroscience topic for individuals who wish to gain research skills and experience not covered in other courses taught in the School.
The research project is guided by a an academic supervisor at ANU or in collaboration with an affiliated institute. Students identify a supervisor after discussion with the course convener.
This is a capstone course, usually completed in the final semester of a coursework masters program
Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:On satisfying the requirements of this course, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
- Plan and engage in an independent and sustained investigation of a chosen research topic supervised by an academic staff.
- Systematically identify relevant theory and concepts in the chosen field, relate these to appropriate methodologies and evidence, and draw appropriate conclusions.
- Carry out a specific set of experiments in neuroscience to address a particular research question, at a standard consistent with current published research in the field.
- Accurately document and analyse laboratory work and research findings
- Present research findings, both orally and written to a high standard
Academic supervisors will assist students with the planning and execution of their project. All supervisory academics are research-active members of the Joint Colleges of Science and are experts in their research field.
Students will be given written feedback for the Laboratory Report. Feedback for the Seminar Presentation will be given to the individual student following their presentation.
ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.
|Week/Session||Summary of Activities||Assessment|
|1||Weeks 1-11 Perform Research; Maintenance of Research Lab Book; Write Final Written Report.|
|2||Week 12 Submit Written Report and Lab Book; Prepare final seminar||Research Report; Lab Book|
|3||During the end of Session Examination period Present seminar||Seminar Presentation|
|Assessment task||Value||Learning Outcomes|
|Written Report of Project||75 %||1 - 5|
|Lab Book||15 %||3, 4|
|Seminar Presentation||10 %||1, 2, 5|
* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details
ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:
The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Integrity . In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.
Moderation of Assessment
Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.
Students are expected to contact their supervisor and arrange regular meetings throughout the semester. The time frame is to be negotiated between the student and supervisor, with the suggested interval being at least once every 1-2 weeks.
Assessment Task 1
Learning Outcomes: 1 - 5
Written Report of Project
Details of task: Submission of a detailed written research report of the project. This should be written in the style of a submitted journal article, with sections for abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion.
Word limit: Suggested length (excluding acknowledgements, bibliography, figure legends and appendices): 5000 words.
Presentation requirements: The report requires the following sections:
- Abstract – A concise statement of the objectives of the study, brief methodology, key results and main conclusions. (Maximum limit 250 words).
- Introduction – A brief outline of the study objectives, providing enough background information to justify the work undertaken and what hypotheses were tested. This should be understandable to a non-expert neuroscientist. (Suggested length - 1000 words max).
- Methods – A succinct summary of the materials and methods used to allow the reader to understand the result. Reference to other publications may be used, and solutions and reagents may be tabulated. (Maximum limit 1000 words).
- Results – Presentation of the data in an appropriate format. Numerical data should be analysed with appropriate, clearly stated, statistical tests. Figures and figure legends should be included at the end of the report, not embedded in the results text.
- Discussion – A discussion of the main findings of the work. Include a critical evaluation of the results, their relationship to other published work in the field and the overall significance of the findings. Future directions for further research could also be included. (Minimum length: 1000 words).
- Acknowledgements – Acknowledge the role of other lab members in the research and clearly state if any of the data presented is not entirely your own work.
- Bibliography - A list of referenced work in Journal of Neuroscience format using Endnote.
- Appendices if required (e.g. further methodological details, computer code).
- Figures – Include figures at the end of the document. Each figure should be on a separate page, with multi panel figures permitted. Figure legends can be included on the figure page if space permits, or on separate pages.
Due Date: Due last working day of session. See Course Wattle site for specific dates.
Assessment Task 2
Learning Outcomes: 3, 4
Details of task: Maintenance of a research laboratory book.
Presentation requirements: Accurate lab records should be kept in a suitable lab book, which would allow another researcher in the field to accurately reproduce your experiments and analyse the data you have acquired. At the end of the project, the research laboratory book(s) should be submitted to the course organiser.
Lab books will be graded for clarity, information content and neatness.
Due Date: Due last working day of session. See Course Wattle site for specific dates.
Assessment Task 3
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 5
Details of task: Presentation of a seminar describing the aims, hypotheses, methods, results and significance of the project. The duration should be 15 minutes, plus a few minutes question time. The PowerPoint file for the presentation should be submitted online using Wattle, by the published due date. The presentation will take place on a subsequent date during the exam period.
Assessment: Assessment will be based on both the content of the seminar and its presentation. The two are necessarily interrelated and include:
• Background to the project and how well the project is introduced
• Clear presentation of hypotheses, aims and experimental plans
• Clear understanding of the methodologies.
• Critical evaluation of the project’s findings in relation to the current field.
• Clear understanding of the limitations, potential pitfalls.
• Presentation of the seminar
- clarity of visual presentations
- structure of the presentation, (logical flow)
- judicious choice of material to be presented (not too much information; rather key points)
- informative answers to audience questions
Due Date: Submission of PowerPoint file due 7 days after the last working day of the session. See Course Wattle site for specific dates.
Presentation requirements: The date for the presentation will closely follow the online submission date for the seminar presentation
Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically, committing to honest and responsible scholarly practice and upholding these values with respect and fairness.
The ANU commits to assisting all members of our community to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle and Academic Misconduct Rule, uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with.
The Academic Misconduct Rule is in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Very minor breaches of the academic integrity principle may result in a reduction of marks of up to 10% of the total marks available for the assessment. The ANU offers a number of online and in person services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. Visit the Academic Skills website for more information about academic integrity, your responsibilities and for assistance with your assignments, writing skills and study.
You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.
For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.
Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.
Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.
Extensions and Penalties
Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.
Resubmission of Assignments
Resubmission of assignments is not permitted
Distribution of grades policy
Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.
Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.
Support for students
The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).
- ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
- ANU Diversity and inclusion for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
- ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
- ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
- ANU Counselling Centre promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
- ANUSA supports and represents undergraduate and ANU College students
- PARSA supports and represents postgraduate and research students
AsPr Brian Billups