• Class Number 5577
  • Term Code 3040
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 to 12 units
  • Topic Part 1
  • Mode of Delivery In Person
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • Sujatha Raman
  • LECTURER
    • Sujatha Raman
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 25/04/2020
  • Class End Date 19/06/2020
  • Census Date 08/05/2020
  • Last Date to Enrol 01/05/2020
SELT Survey Results

“Science and technology (S&T) affect—and insights rooted in understanding of S&T therefore are germane to formulating policy about—practically every issue on the agenda of governments: the economy, public health, education, energy, agriculture, environment, defence, diplomacy, and more" (Professor John Holdren, former Assistant to President Obama for Science & Technology and Director, White House Office of Science & Technology Policy). Australia is no less in need of understanding the interactions of science and technology with policy. This understanding includes the evidence S&T can provide to underpin policy, and the areas where science and technology could influence the directions of Australia in the absence of effective policy.


This course provides a comprehensive approach to exploring the interactions between science, technology and public policy across a suite of policy areas. It is built on a teaching collaboration between two ANU Colleges (Asia and the Pacific; and Science), bringing together expertise from the Crawford School of Public Policy and the Australian National Centre for Public Awareness of Science (CPAS).


It will be interactive, and every session will use policy experts along with academic staff to ensure relevance and depth in the analyses. The course will be flexible, and arranged to maximise access by students who may be either full or part-time. It will consist of two 6-unit components; the first will be a prerequisite for the second. The first 6 units will be split between sessions exploring theoretical and practical underpinnings of how science, technology and public policy are undertaken and case studies exploring how these underpinnings play out, and might need to be revised, in real-world public policy situations. The second 6 units will consist entirely of case studies of increasing complexity as students hone their skills in extracting lessons and developing deeper understanding from examples presented by experienced academics and practitioners of public policy.


Students will be allowed to take its first 6 units or the full 12 units as contributions towards a postgraduate qualification, the 12 unit option contributing to a Science, Technology and Public Policy specialization.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

  1. Understand major themes in studies of the relationship between scientific/technical evidence and other inputs into policy-making
  2. Develop robust ways of assessing diverse sources and forms of evidence for policy analysis and policy-making
  3. Understand key challenges in governing scientific and technological research and innovation, and the salient frameworks put forward for coping with these issues
  4. Critically reflect on lessons from a series of case studies at the interface of science, technology and public policy
  5. Recognise demands for transparency in STPP and develop better ways of engaging at the interface of science, technology, the public and other stakeholders

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

  • written comments
  • verbal comments
  • feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.

Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 1.5.2020, 9.15-4.30 Introducing course aims to develop policy advice skills in light of rapid technological change, complexity of scientific evidence, and the need to make reasoned judgments that meet the diverse needs of government, citizens and stakeholders. Introduction to key cross-cutting themes in STPP with Guest lectures from Crawford and Centre for Public Awareness of Science (CPAS) staff, and interactive discussion Themes: Assessing Scientific evidence for policy; Assessing Public value of Innovation and Emerging Technologies; Understanding Social licence and Public engagement around S&T; Transdisciplinary Synthesis and Communication
2 8.5.2020, 9.15-4.30 Indicative Case study (TBC) - AI, digital innovation and public services Interactive workshop with guest presentations/dialogue with senior experts from the Australian Public Service and the ANU 1000-word case analysis and policy implications
3 15.5.2020, 9.15-4.30 Indicative Case study (TBC): Gene technologies and biosecurity Interactive workshop with guest presentations/dialogue with senior experts from the Australian Public Service and the ANU 1000-word case analysis and policy implications
4 5.6.2020, 9.15-4.30 Indicative Case study (TBC): Health, equity and precision medicine Interactive workshop with guest presentations/dialogue with senior experts from the Australian Public Service and the ANU 1000-word case analysis and policy implications
5 12.6.2020, 9.15-4.30 Indicative Case study (TBC): Agriculture and carbon solutions Interactive workshop with guest presentations/dialogue with senior experts from the Australian Public Service and the ANU 1000-word case analysis and policy implications
6 19.6.2020, 9.15-4.30 Indicative Case study (TBC): Intellectual property and innovation Interactive workshop with guest presentations/dialogue with senior experts from the Australian Public Service and the ANU 1000-word case analysis and policy implications

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Due Date Return of assessment Learning Outcomes
Case study analysis 1 20 % 15/05/2020 22/05/2020 1,2,3,4,5
Case study analysis 2 20 % 22/05/2020 29/05/2020 1,2,3,4,5
Case study analysis 3 20 % 12/06/2020 19/06/2020 1,2,3,4,5
Case study analysis 4 20 % 19/06/2020 26/06/2020 1,2,3,4,5
Case study analysis 5 20 % 26/06/2020 02/07/2020 1,2,3,4,5

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the ANU Online website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

Attendance in-person at the Introductory workshop is a requirement for completion of this course. If illness or other exceptional circumstances make this impossible, a student may apply for permission to review a recording of this workshop and submit the assessment from that viewing. Enrolled students must complete this workshop to proceed to the case studies. Public service participants taking only part of the course are encouraged to take this Introductory workshop before taking part in case studies, but, if that is not possible, they may view an on-line summary of the Introductory material to allow them to take part in one or more case studies. In the latter case, participants must eventually take part in a face to face Introductory workshop and assessment to complete this course.

Assessment Task 1

Value: 20 %
Due Date: 15/05/2020
Return of Assessment: 22/05/2020
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5

Case study analysis 1

1000-word analysis of the case consisting of 200-word abstract (suitable as core message for policy) and 800-word synthesis of key insights drawing from cross-cutting themes, readings and class discussion

Assessment Task 2

Value: 20 %
Due Date: 22/05/2020
Return of Assessment: 29/05/2020
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5

Case study analysis 2

1000-word analysis of the case consisting of 200-word abstract (suitable as core message for policy) and 800-word synthesis of key insights drawing from cross-cutting themes, readings and class discussion

Assessment Task 3

Value: 20 %
Due Date: 12/06/2020
Return of Assessment: 19/06/2020
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5

Case study analysis 3

1000-word analysis of the case consisting of 200-word abstract (suitable as core message for policy) and 800-word synthesis of key insights drawing from cross-cutting themes, readings and class discussion

Assessment Task 4

Value: 20 %
Due Date: 19/06/2020
Return of Assessment: 26/06/2020
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5

Case study analysis 4

1000-word analysis of the case consisting of 200-word abstract (suitable as core message for policy) and 800-word synthesis of key insights drawing from cross-cutting themes, readings and class discussion

Assessment Task 5

Value: 20 %
Due Date: 26/06/2020
Return of Assessment: 02/07/2020
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5

Case study analysis 5

1000-word analysis of the case consisting of 200-word abstract (suitable as core message for policy) and 800-word synthesis of key insights drawing from cross-cutting themes, readings and class discussion

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically, committing to honest and responsible scholarly practice and upholding these values with respect and fairness.


The ANU commits to assisting all members of our community to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle and Academic Misconduct Rule, uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with.


The Academic Misconduct Rule is in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Very minor breaches of the academic integrity principle may result in a reduction of marks of up to 10% of the total marks available for the assessment. The ANU offers a number of online and in person services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. Visit the Academic Skills website for more information about academic integrity, your responsibilities and for assistance with your assignments, writing skills and study.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:

  • Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
  • Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

Sujatha Raman
U1054117@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Science policy; Science and public good; Responsible innovation and technology assessment

Sujatha Raman

By Appointment
Sujatha Raman
61254514
sujatha.raman@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Sujatha Raman

By Appointment

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions