- Class Number 2682
- Term Code 3130
- Class Info
- Unit Value 12 units
- Mode of Delivery In Person
- Dr Raquel Ormella
- Dr Raquel Ormella
- Class Dates
- Class Start Date 22/02/2021
- Class End Date 28/05/2021
- Census Date 31/03/2021
- Last Date to Enrol 01/03/2021
This course provides students with training in research principles and methods as they relate to practice-led research. The course covers research writing modes and methods, studio investigative processes and methodologies, critical thinking. Students experiment with skills relevant to individual research projects.
Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:Upon successful completion of this course, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
- Devise, plan and execute a body of studio investigations.
- Select and combine materials and processes skilfully to give visual form to ideas.
- Develop a studio-based methodology relevant for a specified topic.
- Apply progressive research questions to studio investigations.
- Identify and describe relevant historical and contemporary practices and relate them to the project's concerns by integrating studio and contextual investigation/research.
- Explain and provide a rationale for the practice-led research project.
In Research Methods and Processes 1 students will expand and develop their writing skills, learning how to describe, analyse and evaluate their own work and the work of others in writing. They will practice exegetical and research writing modes and will develop critical and reflective thinking in relation to their own work, and to the work of others.
Students are encouraged to consider how their chosen themes or subjects might lead them to explore the language and potential of studio-based research in new and significant ways. They will learn to articulate how their material choices give rise to different readings, and how their practice-based research can be contextualised both historically and in the contemporary field.
This course is aimed at developing skills relevant to all disciplines in the Honours cohort and provides examples to model how practice-led research is carried out. It is not individualised or discipline-based teaching. Students are required to be open and curious and to apply examples laterally to their own discipline and individual research projects.
Additional Course Costs
There are no additional materials fees for the Research Methods and Processes 1 Seminar class. Each Workshop will have access fees specific to each discipline. Please refer to individual workshops.
Examination Material or equipment
Students are required to provide their own materials for their studio projects.
Students are required to provide their own materials for their studio projects.
Students are to write and submit the Exegesis in electronic form. It is recommended that the students either have their own computers or use the Information Commons computers to work. Information and resources will be posted on Wattle regularly. Please access this site regularly.
Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:
- written comments
- verbal comments
- feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc
ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.
|Week/Session||Summary of Activities||Assessment|
|1||RMP 1 Intensive – see ANU timetable|
|2||RMP 1 Intensive – see ANU timetable|
|3||No Class Public holiday on Monday - no Workshop Seminar|
|4||Monday Workshop Seminar only|
|5||Monday Workshop Seminar only|
|6||Monday Workshop Seminar only|
|7||No Class Public holiday on Monday - no Workshop Seminar|
|8||Writing about practice #1|
|9||Writing about practice #2|
|10||Writing about practice #3|
|11||Meeting with supervisors on Expanded Proposal and drop in assistance sessions|
|12||No class Expanded Proposal due Tuesday - meetings with suopervisors||Assessment #1 Expanded Proposal|
|Assessment task||Value||Due Date||Learning Outcomes|
|Expanded Proposal||20 %||25/05/2021||3-5|
|Studio Investigations||80 %||01/06/2021||1-5|
* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details
ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:
The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Integrity . In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.
Moderation of Assessment
Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.
Assessment Task 1
Learning Outcomes: 3-5
A 3,000 word summary of your project and the progressive questions you have been addressing; including images of your work and the work of 3 to 4 artists you are using as your contextual references; and an annotated bibliography of 3 key texts and reading list. These items will evidence your research topic and the development of your studio-based research. Your discussion needs to focus on describing and evaluating your studio work and providing a contextual research rationale and examples of relevant artists/designers.
Assessment Task 2
Learning Outcomes: 1-5
Work and tests to be installed in the workshop area. If in progress, work must be installed to give a sense of how it will be displayed when complete. Works in progress and rejects should also be included. New media students must have rendered tests and projects to the stage of its development. The work is marked, and students are encouraged to have developed some work to a finished stage.
Work should be accompanied by tests and material that display the contextual research, for example: research journals, books and monographs of artists/designers of interest.
Students are given 10 minutes to introduce their project and explain its development. This is followed by 10 minutes of discussion, then 10 minutes of time when the panel and student write up feedback together.
Devise, plan and execute a body of studio investigations
A body of work of exceptional quality with a very high level of originality and insightfulness.
A body of work of high quality with a high level of originality and insightfulness
A competent body of work that has some originality.
Adequate body of work
Incomplete or flawed body of work or project
Select and combine materials and processes skilfully to give visual form to ideas.
Exceptionally skilful selection and combination of materials and processes
Exceptional presentation of ideas in visual form
High quality selection and combination of materials and processes
High quality presentation of ideas in visual form
Competent selection and combination of materials and processes
Competent presentation of ideas in visual form
Selection and/or combination of materials and processes evident
Adequate presentation of ideas in visual form
Selection and/or combination of materials and processes not adequate
Presentation of materials and processes not adequate
Develop a studio-based methodology relevant for a specified topic.
An exceptional level of skills & knowledge astutely applied to develop & articulate the project
Very high level of skills & knowledge applied to develop & articulate the project
Capable application of appropriate skills & knowledge to develop and articulate project
Basic skills & knowledge applied to develop and articulate project.
Appropriate skills & knowledge not evident in developing or articulating project
Apply progressive research questions to studio investigations.
Critical analysis applied to relevant materials, processes and concepts. Demonstrates critical evaluation of work to develop research. Key concepts are clearly explained and critically engaged with
Analysis applied to relevant materials, processes and concepts. Demonstrates sound evaluation of work to develop research. Key concepts are explained but not consistently engaged with.
Processes and concepts are described. Attempts made to analysis, attempts made to evaluation work to develop research. Limited explanation of key concepts. Materials, processes are described
Materials, processes are described, limited evaluation of work to develop research, limited description only of key concepts
Concepts, materials, processes are not described, no evaluation of work to develop research, key not explained
Identify and describe relevant historical and contemporary practices and relate them to the projects concerns by integrating studio and contextual investigation/research.
Highly sophisticated engagement with theoretical research.
Critically analyses, and evaluates and synthesises with studio outcomes.
High-level reflection on a range of theoretical issues. Critically analyses and evaluates the studio research.
Shows some developing capacity for theoretical concerns, but limited reflection at this stage. Analyses and attempts to evaluates the studio research
Capacity or interest in theoretical engagement at a basic level, needs to expand horizons to effectively analyse outcomes. Does not evaluate the studio research.
Lack of evidence of reflection on broader theoretical issues. No critical analysis or studio research evaluation.
Explain and provide a rationale for the practice-led research project.
Rationale for studio and contextual investigation / research is exceptional.
Rationale for studio and contextual investigation / research is thorough
Rationale for studio and contextual investigation / research is competent.
Rationale for studio and contextual investigation / research is adequate.
Rationale for studio and contextual investigation / research is inadequate
Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically, committing to honest and responsible scholarly practice and upholding these values with respect and fairness.
The ANU commits to assisting all members of our community to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle and Academic Misconduct Rule, uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with.
The Academic Misconduct Rule is in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Very minor breaches of the academic integrity principle may result in a reduction of marks of up to 10% of the total marks available for the assessment. The ANU offers a number of online and in person services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. Visit the Academic Skills website for more information about academic integrity, your responsibilities and for assistance with your assignments, writing skills and study.
You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.
For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.
Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:
- Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
- Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.
Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.
Extensions and Penalties
Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.
Distribution of grades policy
Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.
Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.
Support for students
The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).
- ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
- ANU Diversity and inclusion for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
- ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
- ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
- ANU Counselling Centre promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
- ANUSA supports and represents undergraduate and ANU College students
- PARSA supports and represents postgraduate and research students
Political language and national identity; Human relationships with animals as represented and expressed in visual art and culture; Contemporary painting; Expanded painting and conceptual practice; Contemporary Visual Arts Practice
Dr Raquel Ormella