• Class Number 7411
  • Term Code 3160
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 units
  • Mode of Delivery In Person
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • Prof Mitchell Whitelaw
  • LECTURER
    • Prof Mitchell Whitelaw
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 26/07/2021
  • Class End Date 29/10/2021
  • Census Date 14/09/2021
  • Last Date to Enrol 02/08/2021
SELT Survey Results

Design practice-led research results in a creative output such as a design project, a portfolio of theoretical designs or crafted objects, or an exploration of a practical aspect design technology. This creative output is based on a traditional research process that involves identifying research questions, undertaking a literature review (which may include visual art and design objects and projects), gathering and analysing data, and articulating the original contribution that the creative output makes. The purpose of the exegesis is for a clear articulation in words of this research process.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

Upon successful completion of this course, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
  1. critically reflect on the research project and explain the decision-making processes to demonstrate the ability to assemble/design and install/exhibit a coherent body of studio work; 
  2. synthesise studio and related research and articulate research questions;
  3. analyse and evaluate relevant historical and contemporary practices and relate them to the projects concerns; and
  4. critically evaluate research and analyse their decision-making processes.

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

  • written comments
  • verbal comments
  • feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.

Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 Intro, Topics and planning. What is an exegesis?
2 Writing about design practice 1
3 Writing about design practice 2
4 Outlining: Planning and organising your exegesis
5 Citation management workflows
6 Outlining review and feedback Exegesis outline
7 Writing about your own practice - case studies and exercises
8 Drafting workshop Exegesis partial draft
9 Editing workshop
10 Editing workshop Exegesis full draft
11 Writing in progress feedback and review
12 Writing in progress feedback and review Exegesis

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Due Date Return of assessment Learning Outcomes
Exegesis Outline 0 % 31/08/2021 09/07/2021 1,2,3,4
Exegesis Partial Draft 0 % 28/09/2021 05/10/2021 1,2,3,4
Exegesis Full Draft 0 % 12/10/2021 19/10/2021 1,2,3,4
Exegesis 100 % 29/10/2021 12/11/2021 1,2,3,4

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Integrity . In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Assessment Task 1

Value: 0 %
Due Date: 31/08/2021
Return of Assessment: 09/07/2021
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4

Exegesis Outline

Details of task: Develop a draft outline of your exegesis. The outline should include chapter or section structure, and bullet point summaries of each chapter describing key content.

Word limit (where applicable): No more than 3 pages

Value: 0% (formative feedback only)

Presentation requirements: N/A

Assessment Task 2

Value: 0 %
Due Date: 28/09/2021
Return of Assessment: 05/10/2021
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4

Exegesis Partial Draft

Details of task: Based on your developed outline, submit a partial draft of your exegesis for review and feedback. Include bullet points / outline structure for those sections not yet written. Your partial draft should have at least 2000 words of draft text in addition to the outline.  

Word limit (where applicable): 2500 words

Value: 0%

Presentation requirements: N/A

Assessment Task 3

Value: 0 %
Due Date: 12/10/2021
Return of Assessment: 19/10/2021
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4

Exegesis Full Draft

Details of task: Based on your previous drafts,  submit a full draft of the exegesis for review and feedback. Include all necessary details including figures, formatting and citations / references.

Word limit (where applicable): 5500 - 6500 words

Value: 0%

Presentation requirements: N/A

Assessment Task 4

Value: 100 %
Due Date: 29/10/2021
Return of Assessment: 12/11/2021
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4

Exegesis

Word Limit: 6500 words

Value: 100%

The exegesis should give a clear written articulation of the research undertaken during the Design Honours project. It should clearly describe the research undertaken, including

  • the research question or problem posed
  • its context, including related work in design theory and practice, as well as other disciplines
  • its methodology and methods, including a justification of their validity
  • a reflective and analytic account of the design practice undertaken in the project and,
  • an account of the project's research findings

The exegesis should be clearly structured using chapters and sections, and richly illustrated with relevant visual material. All sources should be cited following the Chicago (notes and bibliography) system: https://www.anu.edu.au/students/academic-skills/academic-integrity/referencing/chicago-manual-of-style.

The exegesis will be assessed on its demonstration of an ability to:

  1. critically reflect on the research project and explain the decision-making processes to demonstrate the ability to assemble/design and install/exhibit a coherent body of studio work; 
  2. synthesise studio and related research and articulate research questions;
  3. analyse and evaluate relevant historical and contemporary practices and relate them to the project's concerns; and
  4. critically evaluate research and analyse their decision-making processes.

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically, committing to honest and responsible scholarly practice and upholding these values with respect and fairness.


The ANU commits to assisting all members of our community to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle and Academic Misconduct Rule, uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with.


The Academic Misconduct Rule is in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Very minor breaches of the academic integrity principle may result in a reduction of marks of up to 10% of the total marks available for the assessment. The ANU offers a number of online and in person services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. Visit the Academic Skills website for more information about academic integrity, your responsibilities and for assistance with your assignments, writing skills and study.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:

  • Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
  • Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

Prof Mitchell Whitelaw
u1821432@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Prof Mitchell Whitelaw

Wednesday 13:00 15:00
Wednesday 13:00 15:00
Prof Mitchell Whitelaw
mitchell.whitelaw@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Prof Mitchell Whitelaw

Wednesday 13:00 15:00
Wednesday 13:00 15:00

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions