• Class Number 4126
  • Term Code 3130
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 units
  • Mode of Delivery In Person
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • Dr Nicholas Brown
  • LECTURER
    • Dr Nicholas Brown
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 22/02/2021
  • Class End Date 28/05/2021
  • Census Date 31/03/2021
  • Last Date to Enrol 01/03/2021
SELT Survey Results

History is a discipline rooted in ancient intellectual traditions and responsive to scholarly innovations in method and approach. This course will expose students to a wide range of methods, themes and approaches in current historical research practice (which may include biographical, cultural, environmental, gender, indigenous, international, intellectual, legal, military, oral, political, popular, post-colonial, public, social, and technological history) and address questions of method and theory. It will focus, as well, on relevant interdisciplinary approaches, such as historical memory studies and ethnohistory. Central to all historical practice is the archive. Through critical readings and workshops, the course will provide opportunities for students to engage with the question of how to construct an archive for their own research projects.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

  1. enhance their understanding and appreciation of historical approaches both within and beyond their fields of specialisation;
  2. develop their capacity to formulate historiographical questions and to contribute to scholarly discussions;
  3. develop a clearer sense of the historiographical schools and scholarly debates to which their own work will contribute;
  4. develop a critical understanding of debates about historical archives and evidence;
  5. articulate in writing their critical understandings of a range of historiographical schools, scholarly debates, and methodological issues, and explicate how it relates to their own research project; and
  6. construct an annotated listing or database of archival and other original materials for their research project, and explicate in writing key interpretative methods and challenges.

Research-Led Teaching

The course is structured around (1) a week-long intensive composed of eight two hour seminars based on critical analysis and discussion of set historiographical texts and which draw on the theoretical, thematic and methodological specialities of academic staff in the School of History and cognate areas in CASS and other Colleges; and (2) two half-day intensive online workshops focused on questions of constructing a research archive of original materials, and methods for using and interpreting evidence. (Expected workload, a summary outline, and a detailed program are included below. All of these activities are guided by experienced scholars, reflecting on their areas of research intensity and professional development.

 

Field Trips

NA

Additional Course Costs

NA

Examination Material or equipment

NA

Required Resources

All materials required in seminars will be provided on the Wattle site for this course.

NA

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

  • written comments
  • verbal comments
  • feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.

Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 Historiographical and methodological seminars – intensive program Historiographical essay - 5000 words (assessed by student’s primary HDR supervisor)
2 Researching in the Archive Archives/sources essay - 2500 words (assessed by student’s primary HDR supervisor)

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Due Date Return of assessment Learning Outcomes
Participation in seminars 20 % 28/05/2021 01/07/2021 1,2,3
Historiographical essay 50 % 03/05/2021 28/05/2021 3,5
Archives/sources essay 30 % 31/05/2021 01/07/2021 4,6

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Integrity . In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

Half of the participation mark (10% of the overall course total) will be allocated to in-class discussion. This will be assessed on the basis of the frequency and quality/relevance of contributions to discussion, demonstrated familiarity and engagement with the readings, and willingness to participate individually or in groups, as requested. The other half of the participation mark will assess students’ written engagement, specifically the critical short questions and posts to Wattle based on assigned readings.

 

Examination(s)

NA

Assessment Task 1

Value: 20 %
Due Date: 28/05/2021
Return of Assessment: 01/07/2021
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3

Participation in seminars

Credit for participation in this unit will be allocated on the basis of active contributions to online seminars in the form of critical discussion of readings, posing discussion questions based on the readings, participating in any in-class activities – including presenting short updates on your own research and research journey – and posting short critical responses and questions to Wattle forums. 

Assessment Task 2

Value: 50 %
Due Date: 03/05/2021
Return of Assessment: 28/05/2021
Learning Outcomes: 3,5

Historiographical essay

This long historiographical essay is based on the first Intensive Seminar Program. Students are first asked to critically evaluate the range of historical schools, theories and approaches discussed in the program. In addition to evaluating the methods, approaches and theories encountered across the week, the essay should critically reflect on how you might apply those approaches, based on your evaluation, to your own research project. This will be marked by your primary supervisor. 

Assessment Task 3

Value: 30 %
Due Date: 31/05/2021
Return of Assessment: 01/07/2021
Learning Outcomes: 4,6

Archives/sources essay

This task is based on the 2 archival workshops. It provides students with an opportunity to begin to assemble their own archival base to support their project. It asks students to reflect on the challenges involved with interpreting the sources which provide the evidentiary basis for their inquiry. This will be marked by your primary supervisor

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically, committing to honest and responsible scholarly practice and upholding these values with respect and fairness.


The ANU commits to assisting all members of our community to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle and Academic Misconduct Rule, uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with.


The Academic Misconduct Rule is in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Very minor breaches of the academic integrity principle may result in a reduction of marks of up to 10% of the total marks available for the assessment. The ANU offers a number of online and in person services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. Visit the Academic Skills website for more information about academic integrity, your responsibilities and for assistance with your assignments, writing skills and study.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:

  • Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
  • Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

Dr Nicholas Brown
253052
u1508528@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Dr Nicholas Brown

By Appointment
By Appointment
Dr Nicholas Brown
53052
nicholas.brown@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Dr Nicholas Brown

By Appointment
By Appointment

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions