- Class Number 2989
- Term Code 3130
- Class Info
- Unit Value 6 units
- Mode of Delivery In Person
- Prof Stephan Fruehling
- Class Dates
- Class Start Date 22/02/2021
- Class End Date 28/05/2021
- Census Date 31/03/2021
- Last Date to Enrol 01/03/2021
- Emily Robertson
This masters level course examines the use of nuclear weapons for political objectives. It reviews the development and current state of nuclear weapons technology, and how nuclear weapons have enabled various deterrence and warfighting strategies during and after the Cold War. Non-proliferation and arms control are examined as ways to limit the spread of nuclear technology. The course then on nuclear weapons proliferation and strategy in specific countries and situations in Asia, and demonstrates how various states in the region seek to attain their political goals through procuring, deploying, and, if necessary, using nuclear weapons. North Korea, Pakistan, India, China and the United States are all discussed with a particular emphasis on the interplay and relationship between the political goals, available technology, and employment strategies. The course concludes with a session on Australia's nuclear policy in past, present and future.
Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
On satisfying the requirements for this course, students will develop a sound understanding of nuclear technology and nuclear strategy; an understanding of the key issues in nuclear weapons programmes of established and new nuclear powers in the Asia-Pacific; strong analytical skills in understanding and evaluating these issues and debates; and the capacity to write clearly and effectively on these matters for a variety of audiences.
There are no field trips for this course
Additional Course Costs
There are no additional class costs in this course
Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:
- written comments
- verbal comments
- feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc
ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.
|Week/Session||Summary of Activities||Assessment|
|1||Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Order (pre-recorded lecture) 22 Feb: One hour synchronous online introduction, Q&A session and debate brief|
|2||1 Mar: Two hour debate activity (Debate One - The Ban Treaty). Face to face or online depending upon Covid-19 regulations.||Debate teams are allocated by email at the start of the course. All students are expected to participate in the debates.|
|3||Nuclear Weapons Technology (pre-recorded lecture) ?History of Nuclear Strategy and Deterrence (pre-recorded lecture)|
|4||15 Mar: Two hour debate activity (Debate Two - 1980s NATO INF Modernization). Face to face or online depending upon Covid-19 regulations.||Debate teams are allocated by email at the start of the course. All students are expected to participate in the debates.|
|5||China's Nuclear Strategy (pre-recorded lecture) 22 Mar: 1 hr synchronous online Q & A||(week TBC depending on guest lecturer availablity)|
|6||India and Pakistan Nulcear Strategy (pre-recorded lecture) 29 Mar: 1 hr synchronous online Q & A||(week TBC depending on guest lecturer availablity)|
|7||North Korean Nuclear Strategy (pre-recorded lecture) 19 Apr: 1 hr synchronous Q & A||(week TBC depending on guest lecturer availablity)|
|8||US and NATO Nuclear Strategy since the Cold War (pre-recorded lecture)|
|9||Nuclear weapons, conventional capability and strategic stability (pre-recorded lecture) 10 May: 1 hr synchronous online Q & A||(week TBC depending on guest lecturer availablity)|
|10||Australia and Nuclear Weapons (pre-recorded lecture)|
|11||17 May: 2 hour in person debate activity (Debate Three - Limited Nuclear War). Face to face or online depending upon Covid-19 regulations.||Debate teams are allocated by email at the start of the course. All students are to attend the debates.|
|12||Final Q&A and Exam brief|
There are no tutorials for this course. Dr Robertson will assign students by email to the debate teams for one of three debates throughout the course.
|Assessment task||Value||Due Date||Return of assessment||Learning Outcomes|
|Debate Reflection||20 %||24/03/2021||07/04/2021||1,4|
* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details
ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:
The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Integrity . In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.
Moderation of Assessment
Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.
There are no participation marks included in this course. However, there are activities throughout that are designed to assist students with their assignments.
Assessment Task 1
Learning Outcomes: 1,4
Word count: 1000 Words
Due 24 March 2021
Will be returned by 7 April with individual written feedback
On 1st March 1 and 15th March, the class will feature debates about assigned topics between two debating teams.
The reflection piece should be based on the assigned literature and the learning and disucssion during the debate.
Please note that while debate participation is not assessed, it is expected that that you attend and actively participate. Your own learning and that of your peers will depend on active and informed engagement of the whole class.
1 March 2021, 5pm - 7pm (Online or face-to-face depending upon Covid-19 regulations)
Participants will be split into two groups and prepare strategic arguments for (Group one) and against (Group two) the following proposition:
“Australia should work to support the international adoption of the Nuclear Ban Treaty”
15 March 2021, 5pm - 7pm (Online or face-to-face depending upon Covid-19 regulations)
It is 1986. Participants will split into groups taking the role of the United States (Group one) and Germany (Group two) and prepare strategic arguments on the following two questions:
What should NATO’s initial use of nuclear weapons against a Warsaw Pact invasion be in terms of (a) timing; (b) size of response; and (c) range / targets?
Is an INF treaty therefore a good idea?
The Nuclear Ban treaty and the INF treaty both sought to limit the number and role of nuclear weapons. What are their main differences, what does this mean for the way they influence extended nuclear deterrence, and which represents, in your view, a more promising approach?
The general essay marking rubric applies, with the exception of research as no research is expected beyond the assigned readings.
Assessment Task 2
Learning Outcomes: 1,3,4
Word count: 3000 Words
Due 5 May 2021
Will be returned by 19 May with individual written feedback
Please write a 3000 word essay on one of the following questions:
- What are the most important challenges facing the Biden Administration's upcoming Nuclear Posture Review?
- New capabilities in cyber and long-range precision strikes combined with a changing global order provide new challenges to maintaining strategic stability. What future do you see for arms control in managing this challenge?
- Nuclear strategist Bernard Brodie wrote in 1946, ‘Thus far the chief purpose of our military establishment has been to win wars. From now on its chief purpose must be to avert them. It can have almost no other useful purpose’. For which nuclear powers do you think that statement remains most relevant for, and for which do you think it is least relevant? Why is this the case?
Please add the cover sheet that will be available on Wattle before making your submission via Turnitin. References are to be in the Chicago style (links are provided on Wattle).
Assessment Task 3
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4
Time and Date TBA
The final exam for STST8026 will be a 3 hour online exam – at (time TBA) you will have access to the exam script, and will need to upload your responses BEFORE (Time TBA) (i.e. three hours later).
Please upload a MS word file. You may type into the exam script or into a separate file.
The exam has three questions of equal value, and you need to answer all three (i.e. we recommend you allocate yourself one hour per question).
The questions are fairly broad, and you will not find a ‘right’ answer in the readings, course notes or on the internet.
What we are looking for is your ability to answer the question drawing on the conceptual and historical knowledge on nuclear weapons and nuclear strategy you gained throughout the course.
There is no need for footnotes. Write the exam as you would if you had no access to internet, notes or sources. However, the standard rules regarding plagiarism and academic integrity of course apply.
There is no minimum or maximum word limit, but given the time available, we would not expect you to write more than 1000 words on each question. Content in terms of reasoned argument and the ability to make use of historic evidence and concepts is more important than length.
Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically, committing to honest and responsible scholarly practice and upholding these values with respect and fairness.
The ANU commits to assisting all members of our community to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle and Academic Misconduct Rule, uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with.
The Academic Misconduct Rule is in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Very minor breaches of the academic integrity principle may result in a reduction of marks of up to 10% of the total marks available for the assessment. The ANU offers a number of online and in person services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. Visit the Academic Skills website for more information about academic integrity, your responsibilities and for assistance with your assignments, writing skills and study.
You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.
For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.
Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:
- Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
- Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.
Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.
Assignments will be returned with individual written feedback two weeks after submission.
Extensions and Penalties
Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.
Distribution of grades policy
Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.
Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.
Support for students
The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).
- ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
- ANU Diversity and inclusion for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
- ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
- ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
- ANU Counselling Centre promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
- ANUSA supports and represents undergraduate and ANU College students
- PARSA supports and represents postgraduate and research students