• Class Number 7137
  • Term Code 3160
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 units
  • Mode of Delivery In Person
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • Dr Rachael Brown
  • LECTURER
    • Dr Rachael Brown
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 26/07/2021
  • Class End Date 29/10/2021
  • Census Date 14/09/2021
  • Last Date to Enrol 02/08/2021
SELT Survey Results

This advanced undergraduate course introduces students to philosophical research in philosophy of the life sciences, including philosophy of biology, philosophy of psychology, and philosophy of neuroscience. It is suitable for students who have a strong background in philosophy.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

Upon successful completion of this course, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
  1. analyse philosophical positions relating to philosophy of the life sciences; 
  2. synthesise novel arguments to extend philosophical positions to new empirical domains in the life sciences; 
  3. conduct philosophical research and effectively integrate and organize concepts and arguments to defend a position; and
  4. dispute and evaluate philosophical ideas verbally and to engage in interactive dialogue.

Research-Led Teaching

This course will be based around the manuscript for a research monograph the convenor is writing on The Evolved Mind. Students will have the opportunity to engage critically with the key themes of this monograph and in doing so engage with cutting edge philosophical debates in the philosophy of biology and philosophy of cognitive science concerning evolutionary explanations of the human mind.

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

  • written comments
  • verbal comments
  • feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.

Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 Introduction: Darwin's Dangerous Idea and the Evolved Mind
2 Introduction: Darwin's Dangerous Idea and the Evolved Mind
3 Chapter 1: Adapted Minds
4 Chapter 1: Adapted Minds
5 Presentation Week Presentation 1 due Monday 23/8, Peer Review due Friday 27/8
6 Chapter 2: Phylogenetic Plausibility
7 Chapter 2: Phylogenetic Plausibility Written assessment 1 due 20/7
8 Chapter 3: Lineage Explanations
9 Chapter 3: Lineage Explanations
10 Chapter 4: Mechanistic Plausibility
11 Chapter 4: Mechanistic Plausibility
12 Presentation Week Presentation 1 due Monday 25/10, Peer Review due Friday 4/10
13 Examination Period Written assessment 2 due 8/11

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Learning Outcomes
Presentation 1 20 % 1, 2, 4
Essay 1 20 % 1, 2, 3
Presentation 2 20 % 1, 2, 4
Essay 2 30 % 1, 2, 3
Class participation 10 % 1, 2, 4

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Integrity . In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

See assessment task 5.

Assessment Task 1

Value: 20 %
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 4

Presentation 1

  • Comprises a 10-minute recorded presentation and associated peer feedback.
  • Details of this assessment will be available in week 1.
  • Presentations to be uploaded to Wattle by 5pm Monday 23rd August.
  • Peer Feedback to be provided by 5pm Friday 27th August.
  • Late policy: Late submission not permitted.
  • Worth 20% of your overall grade for the course.
  • Your work will be judged on: clarity of the problem being addressed, contextualization of the problem within the broader literature, articulation of argument structure and rationale, clarity of verbal presentation, quality of peer review feedback given to others.

Assessment Task 2

Value: 20 %
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 3

Essay 1

  • Comprises a written piece of 1500 words on a topic set out by the convenor.
  • Details of this assessment will be available in week 1.
  • To be submitted to Turnitin by 5pm, Monday 20th September 2021
  • Late policy: Late submission permitted however, late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof.
  • Late submission of final essays is not accepted more than 10 working days after the due date (i.e. 4/10)
  • Will be returned with final grades.
  • Worth 20% of your overall grade for the course.
  • Your work will be judged on: how well it answers the question asked, how well it displays mastery of relevant content of the course, and clarity in setting out views and arguments.

Assessment Task 3

Value: 20 %
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 4

Presentation 2

  • Comprises a 10-minute recorded presentation and associated peer feedback.
  • Details of this assessment will be available in week 7.
  • Presentations to be uploaded to Wattle by 5pm Monday 25th October.
  • Peer Feedback to be provided by 5pm Friday 29th October
  • Late policy: Late submission not permitted.
  • Worth 20% of your overall grade for the course.
  • Your work will be judged on: clarity of the problem being addressed, contextualization of the problem within the broader literature, articulation of argument structure and rationale, clarity of verbal presentation, quality of peer review feedback given to others.

Assessment Task 4

Value: 30 %
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 3

Essay 2

  • Comprises a written piece of 2500 words on a topic set out by the convenor.
  • Details of this assessment will be available in week 7.
  • To be submitted to Turnitin by 5pm, Monday 8th November 2021
  • Late policy: Late submission permitted however, late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof.
  • Late submission of final essays is not accepted more than 10 working days after the due date (i.e. 22/11)
  • Will be returned with final grades.
  • Worth 30% of your overall grade for the course.
  • Your work will be judged on: how well it answers the question asked, how well it displays mastery of relevant content of the course, and clarity in setting out views and arguments.

Assessment Task 5

Value: 10 %
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 4

Class participation

Students are required to:

  • Prepare for class by completing the preparation activities for each topic in advance of the relevant session.
  • Participate in discussion of required readings and other material.

Worth 10% of your overall grade for the course.

Marking Criteria:

  • Outstanding contributor: Contributions in class reflect extensive preparation. Ideas offered are usually substantive; provide major insights and direction for class discussion. Challenges are substantiated and persuasive. Makes an important contribution to class discussion overall.
  • Good contributor: Contributions in class reflect thorough preparation. Ideas offered are often substantive; provide useful insights and some direction for class discussion. Challenges are substantiated and often persuasive. Makes a significant contribution to class discussion overall.
  • Adequate contributor: Contributions in class reflect adequate preparation. Ideas offered are sometimes substantive; provide some insight but rarely offer direction for class discussion. Challenges are sometimes presented, substantiated and persuasive. Makes a contribution to class discussion overall.
  • Unsatisfactory contributor: Contributions in class reflect inadequate preparation. Ideas offered are rarely substantive; rarely provide insight but do not offer useful direction for class discussion. Contributions may be distractions rather than constructive. Does not make a positive contribution to class discussion overall.
  • Non-participant: This person says little or nothing in class. There is not an adequate basis for evaluation. Makes no contribution to discussion.

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically, committing to honest and responsible scholarly practice and upholding these values with respect and fairness.


The ANU commits to assisting all members of our community to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle and Academic Misconduct Rule, uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with.


The Academic Misconduct Rule is in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Very minor breaches of the academic integrity principle may result in a reduction of marks of up to 10% of the total marks available for the assessment. The ANU offers a number of online and in person services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. Visit the Academic Skills website for more information about academic integrity, your responsibilities and for assistance with your assignments, writing skills and study.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. See each assessment for details.

Referencing Requirements

Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

Dr Rachael Brown
6125 4355
u4379931@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Philosophy of Biology, Philosophy of Cognitive Science

Dr Rachael Brown

Dr Rachael Brown
Brown
rachael.brown@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Dr Rachael Brown

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions