- Class Number 4069
- Term Code 3230
- Class Info
- Unit Value 6 units
- Mode of Delivery In Person
- Gabriel T.W. Wong
- Gabriel T.W. Wong
- Class Dates
- Class Start Date 21/02/2022
- Class End Date 27/05/2022
- Census Date 31/03/2022
- Last Date to Enrol 28/02/2022
Evidence-based policy development has emerged as key foundation of private enterprise and public service. Whether you're a policy officer, program manager or senior executive, understanding research and the research process is critical to innovation and improvement. In this course, students will gain an insight into how criminologists undertake research on policy related crime and punishment issues in Australia. Through a series of online and in-class exercises students will develop an understanding and the practical skills necessary to critique criminological research and implement a variety of methodological techniques.
This course is weighted towards understanding criminological research design, methods and evidence. An expert opinion or an appeal to “common sense” are often used for the basis of certain believes and behaviours. Experience in policymaking, however, implies that we must rely on evidence derived from robust research for effective and defensible decision-making. Skills in understanding and using research evidence are powerful for the exploration of substantiative research questions in social policy and criminology. Such skills are also highly sought after by employers in both the public and private sectors.
Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
- understand the principles that underpin social science research and the problems that arise in real world research on criminal justice topics at an advanced level;
- think critically about data and the methodologies used to collate and analyse data;
- source data and interpret information appropriately;
- design an evaluation methodology; and
- communicate effectively both orally and in written form.
There are no prescribed texts for this course. Set readings will be provided via Wattle. If students wish to access a book to aid study, recommended texts include:
· Davies, P. & Francis, P. (2018). Doing criminological research, 1st ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
· Maxfield, M., and Babbie, E. (2008) Research methods for criminal justice and criminology, 5th ed. ed. Wadsworth Pub. Co, Belmont, CA.
· Maxfield, M., and Babbie, E. (2011) Research methods for criminal justice and criminology, 6th ed. ed. Wadsworth Pub. Co, Belmont, CA.
Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:
- written comments
- verbal comments
- feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc
ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.
|Week/Session||Summary of Activities||Assessment|
|1||Course Introduction: Why do we need criminological research?|
|2||Criminological research ethics: Key principles|
|3||Criminological research ethics: Practical issues|
|4||Common measures in criminological research (I)|
|5||Common measures in criminological research (II)|
|6||Mid-term quiz||Mid-term quiz|
|7||Common analytic methods in criminological research||Presentation|
|8||Evaluation of justice and crime prevention interventions||Presentation|
|9||Economic analyses and its application in criminological research||Presentation|
|10||Practical concerns and challenges in criminological research – Sampling||Presentation|
|11||Practical concerns and challenges in criminological research – Analysis||Presentation|
|12||Advancement and the future of criminological research + Summary|
|Assessment task||Value||Due Date||Learning Outcomes|
|Research proposal and ethics application||15 %||01/04/2022||1, 2, 3, 4, 5|
|Mid-term quiz||20 %||08/04/2022||1; 2; 3|
|Research report||30 %||03/06/2022||1,2,3,4,5|
|Peer review report||5 %||10/06/2022||1,2,3,4,5|
|Online exam||30 %||07/06/2022||1,2,3,4|
* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details
ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:
- Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure
- Special Assessment Consideration Guideline and General Information
- Student Surveys and Evaluations
- Deferred Examinations
- Student Complaint Resolution Policy and Procedure
- Code of practice for teaching and learning
The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.
Moderation of Assessment
Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.
Assessment Task 1
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Research proposal and ethics application
You will be asked to: (i) form a group of 4 or 5; (ii) choose a topic at the beginning of the semester; and (iii) work with your colleagues on the proposal and ethics application.
This assessment item will provide a foundation for the actual research and data collection which occurs during the second half of the semester. The overall goal of the assessment is to examine your skills in developing research ideas and a feasible and ethical research plan to explore relevant questions in social policy and criminology.
This assessment is a group-work activity. Your assessment will be based on your group performance in the application. All groups will be advised on necessary changes and issues that require addressing before data collection and analysis.
More information relating to the requirement of this assessment will be provided in Week 2.
Assessment Task 2
Learning Outcomes: 1; 2; 3
The assessment involves 10 multiple choice questions.
Assessment Task 3
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5
You will be asked to collect and analysis data according to your chosen topic (in Assessment Item 2). The research results should be discussed and presented as an academic journal article. The report should include the following components: Background (introduction and context), Method, Results, and Discussion.
This assessment is a group-work activity. Each group should submit only 1 copy of the report via Turnitin.
The report will be assessed by professional examiners (contributing to 25% of your grade) and peer reviewers (contributing to 5% of your grade).
Assessment Task 4
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5
Peer review report
This is an individual work. Each student will be given an opportunity to review a research report (Assessment Item 4) submitted by another group. The review will contribute to the 5% of the overall grade of the report. Each piece of review will also be assessed and provided to the student researchers (authors of the assessed report) for learning purposes.
The quality of your review will be examined by the convenor which count towards 5% of your overall grade.
Assessment Task 5
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4
The assessment involves 15 multiple choice questions.
Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.
The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.
The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.
The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.
You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.
For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.
Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:
- Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
- Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.
The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material.
Extensions and Penalties
Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.
Distribution of grades policy
Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.
Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.
Support for students
The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).
- ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
- ANU Access and inclusion for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
- ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
- ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
- ANU Counselling Centre promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
- ANUSA supports and represents undergraduate and ANU College students
- PARSA supports and represents postgraduate and research students
Gabriel T.W. Wong
Gabriel T.W. Wong