- Class Number 7304
- Term Code 3260
- Class Info
- Unit Value 6 units
- Mode of Delivery In Person
- Dr Brandon Yoder
- Class Dates
- Class Start Date 25/07/2022
- Class End Date 28/10/2022
- Census Date 31/08/2022
- Last Date to Enrol 01/08/2022
- Dr Ben Goldsmith
This course provides a broad introduction to the study of international relations. As a field of study, international relations focuses on the political, military, economic, and cultural interaction of state and non-state actors at the global level. The field therefore encompasses a diverse array of topics, from the causes of war to the politics of development, from international institutions to the environment. In this course, we begin by exploring the key concepts, foundational events, issues, and processes of international relations in order to provide the general knowledge and analytic tools necessary to understand, evaluate, and respond to a complex array of problems in the contemporary world.
Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
- have a broad understanding of some of the most important ideas, issues and events in international relations particularly in the period since World War 1;
- have an enhanced appreciation of the contemporary international relations agenda;
- be able to better comprehend and articulate their thoughts on issues of major current significance;
- have developed stronger research, writing and analytical skills; and
- be well prepared for the comprehensive education in international relations offered by the School of Politics and International Relations.
This class incorporates cutting-edge theoretical developments and empirical findings from Dr Brandon Yoder’s research as well as the academic fields in which he works. Dr. Yoder’s research focuses on contemporary US-China relations and East Asian regional dynamics more broadly. His academic interests also cover international security, interstate signalling, game theory and laboratory experiments.
Research-led teaching is not simply about the research expertise that convenors bring to a course. It also includes the ways in which courses’ skills acquisition and assessment are designed to enable students to acquire sound knowledge-acquisition skills. To this end, the course’s activities have been designed around reading comprehension as a skill central to political analysis. Therefore, students read and prepare comments about core texts for discussion in tutorial. Evidence gathering is also a core research skill. To this end, students are alerted to many potential sources for information and evidence that can be useful for students’ simulation participation and response essay. Thoughtful analysis and presentation of research findings is a crucial core research skill, and therefore the course contains two essay assessments to provide students with an opportunity to practice those skills.
Frieden, Jeffry A., David A. Lake, & Kenneth A. Schultz. 2019. World Politics: Interests, Interactions, and Institutions. International Student Fourth edition. New York & London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:
- written comments
- verbal comments
- feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc
ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.
|Week/Session||Summary of Activities||Assessment|
|1||Introduction to the IR discipline||No tutorials, sign up for them this week|
|2||Core concepts||Tutorials start, assign roles for Syria simulation|
|3||Why is there conflict?|
|4||Domestic politics and conflict|
|5||International institutions and conflict|
|6||Non-state actors and conflict||Midterm exam|
|7||International Political Economy||political science writing|
|8||Politics of economic development||Position paper due|
|9||International law and norms|
|10||The global environment|
|11||Human rights||Response paper due|
ANU utilises MyTimetable to enable students to view the timetable for their enrolled courses, browse, then self-allocate to small teaching activities / tutorials so they can better plan their time. Find out more on the Timetable webpage.
|Assessment task||Value||Learning Outcomes|
|Tutorial Participation||10 %||Tutorial Participation|
|Response questions||10 %||Weekly response questions|
|Midterm exam||20 %||Midterm exam|
|Response paper||30 %||Response paper|
|Final exam||30 %||Final exam|
* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details
ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:
The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Integrity . In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.
Moderation of Assessment
Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.
Assessment Task 1
Learning Outcomes: Tutorial Participation
Tutorial participation marks are based on your in-class contributions. Tutors will prioritize contributions from students who have not yet spoken that week. Since there is simply not enough time in each session for high-volume contributions from every student, grades will necessarily be weighted more toward quality than quantity. But we do expect everyone to make at least one contribution per tutorial, and your tutor will assess whether it's a mundane comment or one that shows real intellectual effort and insight and advances the discussion. Well-prepared students thus might want to, on occasion, “save your bullets” for a topic where you have something really good to say. Furthermore, to expand opportunities for participation, we will also count toward your grade good questions brought up in the live Q&A sessions and your contributions to small group discussions in tutorials.
In addition, 1% of the tutorial mark will be based on your timely submission (via upload to your Wattle forum) of a position paper (by 11:59pm on TBA). Students who submit the position paper will obtain full credit; those who do not will receive a 0. A description of the position paper assignment is on Wattle.
Assessment Task 2
Learning Outcomes: Weekly response questions
Weekly response questions on Wattle, designed to gauge your understanding of the assigned readings and lectures. For each week of the course, students are assigned to write a 1-2 paragraph response (limit: 300 words) to a short-answer discussion question in the weekly “response question” forum on Wattle. These are due prior to the start of your tutorial. They will be graded on a 0-3 point scale: 3 for complete, on-time submission, 2 for late submission (no expiry – if you miss a response, make it up for 2 points any time before the final exam!), 1 for superficial/inadequate response, and 0 for non-submission. Inadequate submissions can be revised and resubmitted later for an additional point. The requirements for weekly responses have been relaxed so that the grade is independent of the quality of the response. This allows the students to "write for themselves" without pressure, with the incentive to invest time in the response coming in the form of preparation for the exams. The response questions are similar to the exam questions, so they are designed to guide students in their preparation, not to create an additional burden. Moreover, because the response questions are easy to get full credit on, they boost overall grades substantially.
Assessment Task 3
Learning Outcomes: Midterm exam
The midterm exam will evaluate students’ knowledge of the readings and course material and their ability to write a clear, coherent, and concisely argued essay about course material. Students will have 15 minutes reading time and 90 minutes to complete the exam. More information about the midterm will be available on Wattle and discussed during lecture and tutorial.
Assessment Task 4
Learning Outcomes: Response paper
The response paper’s main goal is to have you apply the theoretical frameworks and core concepts learnt in this course to a contemporary international challenge: the war in Syria. This paper will be largely based on your experience in the Syrian simulation exercise described at the end of this course guide, below. Details of the assignment, including a rubric, can be found on Wattle.
Assessment Task 5
Learning Outcomes: Final exam
The final exam structure will be discussed during lectures and in tutorial. Students will have a 15-minute reading period and a two-hour writing time. As per CASS policy, all exams are blind marked and they are not returned to the students, nor are comments provided. You may contact the conveners within 30 working days of the release of results to learn your specific exam mark, or to request an appeal.
Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically, committing to honest and responsible scholarly practice and upholding these values with respect and fairness.
The ANU commits to assisting all members of our community to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle and Academic Misconduct Rule, uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with.
The Academic Misconduct Rule is in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Very minor breaches of the academic integrity principle may result in a reduction of marks of up to 10% of the total marks available for the assessment. The ANU offers a number of online and in person services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. Visit the Academic Skills website for more information about academic integrity, your responsibilities and for assistance with your assignments, writing skills and study.
You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.
For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.
Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:
- Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
- Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted more than 10 working days after the due date, unless otherwise specified. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.
Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.
Extensions and Penalties
Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.
Distribution of grades policy
Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.
Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.
Support for students
The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).
- ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
- ANU Diversity and inclusion for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
- ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
- ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
- ANU Counselling Centre promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
- ANUSA supports and represents undergraduate and ANU College students
- PARSA supports and represents postgraduate and research students
International security, US-China relations, East Asian regional politics, game theory
Dr Brandon Yoder