• Class Number 4201
  • Term Code 3330
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 units
  • Mode of Delivery In Person
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • AsPr Benjamin Schwessinger
    • Prof Peter Solomon
  • LECTURER
    • Dr Martyn Kirk
    • Dr Robyn Hall
    • Dr Simon Williams
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 20/02/2023
  • Class End Date 26/05/2023
  • Census Date 31/03/2023
  • Last Date to Enrol 27/02/2023
  • TUTOR
    • Rita Tam
    • Rachel Leonard
    • Abigail Graetz
SELT Survey Results

Biosecurity is essential to protect human, animal, plant, and environmental health in Australia under ever changing global environmental conditions. Threats to our collective health are many fold ranging from SARS-COV2 to invasive plant pathogens like myrtle rust and animal disease like foot and mouth disease. Incursions of these pathogens have severe societal and economic impact once they are introduced into our communities and environments.


This course starts off with providing an introduction to policies and legislation that frame the collective biosecurity discussions in Australia. It moves on to introduce the biology of plant pathogens that pose biosecurity risks. It explores novel technologies that improve detection and identification of organisms that pose biosecurity risks. It introduces models that aim to quantify these risks. The course then puts SARS-COV2 and COVID-19 in a biosecurity and public health perspective. At the end it finishes off with an Indigenous view on biosecurity before exploring future employment opportunities in the biosecurity sector.


Honours Pathway Option (HPO)

Entry to this option will be subject to approval by the course convener. Students who take this option will have to attend two additional tutorials (one in week 4 and one in week 10) with a focus on literature reviews on plant biosecurity risks and SARS-CoV2, respectively. HPO students will be assessed at a higher standard which will be reflected in a separate marking rubric for practical reports and the critical essay on biosecurity.

 

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

  1. Research and evaluate biosecurity information with a specific focus on its value in the Australian context.
  2. Contrast the principles underlying policies used to manage biosecurity.
  3. Classify the biological attributes that make feral animals, weeds, parasites and pathogenic micro-organisms a biosecurity threat.
  4. Critically analyse the science that underpines our understanding of new biosecurity threats.
  5. Demonstrate and evaluate the application of scientific principles and methods in a biosecurity context using specific case studies.

Research-Led Teaching

Each of the lecturers in this course is an active researcher, industry, or government representative with expertise in areas closely related to their lectures and tutorials. Their lectures and tutorials will draw on that expertise and include examples of their own expert knowledge to illustrate advances in our understanding and questions that still need to be answered around biosecurity.


The practicals are hands on mini-research projects directly related to biosecurity:


The first practical mini-research project (week 2-6) revolves around plant pathogen diagnostics including classic visual assessments, culture dependent methods, and DNA sequence-based classification. This practical builds on prior molecular biology knowledge of enrolled students and introduces new concepts building on this foundation.


The second practical mini-research project (week 7-11) revolves around investigating an incursion scenario of SARS-CoV2. Students will generate complete SARS-CoV2 genomes using molecular biology and DNA sequencing. The consensus sequences (genomes) will then be used to answer questions of inter-relatedness of sampled genomes and their relationship in a global context.

Required Resources

Students will require access to their own computer including excel and other third party software. These will be required to analyse data obtained during the mini-research projects.

Whether you are on campus or studying remotely, there are a variety of online platforms you will use to participate in your study program. These could include videos for lectures and other instruction, two-way video conferencing for interactive learning, email and other messaging tools for communication, interactive web apps for formative and collaborative activities, print and/or photo/scan for handwritten work and drawings, and home-based assessment.

ANU outlines recommended student system requirements to ensure you are able to participate fully in your learning. Other information is also available about the various Learning Platforms you may use.

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

  • written comments
  • verbal comments
  • feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.

Other Information

Honours Pathway Option (HPO)

Students who take this option will have to attend two additional tutorials (one in week 4 and one in week 10) with a focus on literature reviews on plant biosecurity risks and SARS-CoV2, respectively. HPO students will be assessed at a higher standard which will be reflected in a separate marking rubric for practical reports and the critical essay on biosecurity.

Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 Week 1: Introductory lectures and tutorial on the importance of Biosecurity from a government perspective. In person lectures and tutorials are supported by a representative of the Department of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries.
2 Week 2: What does biosecurity mean, how is it implemented, and who are the main stakeholders? This week's material will be presented in form of online videos, webpages, and reports. Prior study of the material is required for the tutorial on Thursday.
3 Week 2: Practical mini-research projects on plant pathogen diagnostics. In person practical.
4 Week 3: The foundations of Molecular Plant Pathology. Lecture material will be provided as online on-demand lectures. The in-person tutorial will align with lecture content.
5 Week 3: Practical mini-research projects on plant pathogen diagnostics. In-person practical.
6 Week 4: The foundations of Molecular Plant Pathology. Lecture material will be provided as online on-demand lectures. The in-person tutorial will align with lecture content.
7 Week 4: Practical mini-research projects on plant pathogen diagnostics. In-person practical. Assessment #2 as practical report subsection with a focus on background and introduction.
8 Week 5: The foundations of DNA sequencing and its application in biosecurity. Lecture material will be provided as online on-demand lectures. The in-person tutorial will align with lecture content.
9 Week 5: Practical mini-research projects on plant pathogen diagnostics. In-person practical.
10 Week 6: The foundations of DNA sequencing and its application in biosecurity. Lecture material will be provided as online on-demand lectures. The in-person tutorial will align with lecture content.
11 Week 6: Practical mini-research projects on plant pathogen diagnostics. In-person practical. Assessment #3 as full practical mini-research project report.
12 Week 7: Biosecurity threats and their risk assessment. Lecture material will be provided as online on-demand lectures. The in-person tutorial will align with lecture content.
13 Week 7: Practical mini-research projects on a SARS-CoV2 incursion scenario. In-person practical.
14 Week 8: Epidemiology and test-trace-isolate-quarantine principles using SARS-CoV2 as a case study. Lecture material will be provided as online on-demand lectures. The in-person tutorial will align with lecture content.
15 Week 8: Practical mini-research projects on a SARS-CoV2 incursion scenario. In-person practical.
16 Week 9: Epidemiology and test-trace-isolate-quarantine principles using SARS-CoV2 as a case study. Lecture material will be provided as online on-demand lectures. The in-person tutorial will align with lecture content.
17 Week 9: Practical mini-research projects on a SARS-CoV2 incursion scenario. In-person practical.
18 Week 10: Epidemiology and test-trace-isolate-quarantine principles using SARS-CoV2 as a case study. Lecture material will be provided as online on-demand lectures. The in-person tutorial will align with lecture content.
19 Week 10: Practical mini-research projects on a SARS-CoV2 incursion scenario. In-person practical.
20 Week 11: Biosecurity and the intersection with indigenous culture and knowledge. Lecture material will be provided as online on-demand lectures. The in-person tutorial will align with lecture content.
21 Week 11: Practical mini-research projects on a SARS-CoV2 incursion scenario. In-person practical. Assessment #4 as full practical report.
22 Week 12: Current challenges and opportunities in the biosecurity sector. This week's lectures will be in person and include an active course feedback session. The in-person tutorial will include a round table discussion on employment opportunities in the Australian biosecurity sector. Panel members will include government and industry representatives.

Tutorial Registration

ANU utilises MyTimetable to enable students to view the timetable for their enrolled courses, browse, then self-allocate to small teaching activities / tutorials so they can better plan their time. Find out more on the Timetable webpage.

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Due Date Return of assessment Learning Outcomes
Weekly online mini-quizzes 20 % * * 2,3,4
Practical report subsection with a focus on background and introduction for the mini-research project on plant pathogen diagnostics 6 % 20/03/2023 31/03/2023 1,3,4,5
Full practical report on mini-research project on plant pathogen diagnostics 22 % 07/04/2023 21/04/2023 1,3,4,5
Full practical report on mini-research project on a SARS-CoV2 incursion scenario 22 % 02/06/2023 12/06/2023 1,3,4,5
Critical essay on a biosecurity case study 30 % 09/06/2023 19/06/2023 1,2,3,4,5

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

Participation in 80% of tutorials and 80% of practical laboratories are a course requirement. Submission of a critical essay on a biosecurity topic of choice is also a course requirement.

Assessment Task 1

Value: 20 %
Learning Outcomes: 2,3,4

Weekly online mini-quizzes

There will be ten online mini-quizzes which are open-book conducted via Wattle. The mini-quizzes will be conducted in week 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. They will cover the content of the previous week with the exception for the quiz in week 6 which will cover content for week 5 and 6 combined. Quizzes will be made available from Monday to Friday in each indicated week, but will only remain open for 50 minutes once initiated.


Quizzes will be made up of multiple choice and/or open ended questions. Results and feedback will be released the following week Wednesday.

Assessment Task 2

Value: 6 %
Due Date: 20/03/2023
Return of Assessment: 31/03/2023
Learning Outcomes: 1,3,4,5

Practical report subsection with a focus on background and introduction for the mini-research project on plant pathogen diagnostics

Write a background and introduction subsection for the mini-research project on plant pathogen diagnostics. This subsection should introduce the background to the biology that is addressed in the mini-research project. It should include the theoretical background on the applied methodologies. It should finish by formulating the specific biology questions and aims addressed in the the research project. Start your subsection with a descriptive title. You should include a separate reference section with the heading References and these should reference primary literature provided and self-identified.


The value of this assessment task is to provide you with an initial opportunity to practice your scientific writing. We aspire to provide detailed in-depth feedback on this specific submission so you can incorporate our detailed feedback into future assessment tasks. We will provide detailed instructions on how to write this specific subsection of practical mini-research project report.


Word limit:

This task has an upper word limit of 450 words. You will receive penalties if your answers is over 10% longer than the word limit. The word count includes all words provided in main section but not the reference section. The penalties will be applied in 10% increments.

•            10-20% over the word limit -> 10% penalty.

•            20-30% over the word limit -> 20% penalty.

•            30-40% over the word limit -> 30% penalty.

•            … and so on.

For example, the word limit is 450 and your answer is 558 words long. This means you are 24% [108/450*100] over the word limit. If your normal score for the question would have been 4, you now received a penalty of 20% and your final score for this answer is 3.6.


Assessment task return:

We aspire to return your submission within 2 weeks.


Late penalties:

Late submissions are allowed but will be penalized as outlined below.

Assessment Task 3

Value: 22 %
Due Date: 07/04/2023
Return of Assessment: 21/04/2023
Learning Outcomes: 1,3,4,5

Full practical report on mini-research project on plant pathogen diagnostics

Write a full practical report on the mini-research project and submit your detailed laboratory notebook as PDF. Students are expected to consider feedback received previously on assessment tasks 2 and 3.

The full practical report should contain the following subsections:

  • Title
  • Background and Introduction. Approximate word count 400 and weighting of 25%.
  • Concise methodology. Approximate word count 300 and weighting of 13%.
  • Results. This section should describe the results obtained in the mini-research project and include figures and tables as appropriate. Figures and table legends are not included in the word count. Approximate word count 400 and weighting of 25%.
  • Discussion. This section should include interpretation of the results in the context of the learned course content so far. In addition, it should incorporate provided and self-identified scientific literature. It should also clearly highlight the limitation of the study and propose a small set of alternative approaches or future directions. Approximate word count 400 and weighting of 25%.
  • Reference list. Weighting of 2% for appropriate style only.


Students are also requested to submit the laboratory notebook as PDF version. No word limit. Weighting 10%.


The value of this assessment task is to incorporate previous detailed feedback to improve the overall mini-research project report. In addition, this assessment task provides student with the opportunity to summarise the mini-project concisely and discuss results critically. We will provide detailed instructions on how to write each specific subsection of the practical mini-research project report. We will provide overall feedback on the report and marks for each subsection.


Word limit:

This task has an upper word limit of 1500 words. You will receive penalties if your report is over 10% longer than the word limit. The word count includes all words provided in main sections but not the reference section and figure/table legends. The penalties will be applied in 10% increments.

•            10-20% over the word limit -> 10% penalty.

•            20-30% over the word limit -> 20% penalty.

•            30-40% over the word limit -> 30% penalty.

•            … and so on.


Assessment task return:

We aspire to return your submission within 2 weeks.


Late penalties:

Late submissions are allowed but will be penalized as outlined below.

Assessment Task 4

Value: 22 %
Due Date: 02/06/2023
Return of Assessment: 12/06/2023
Learning Outcomes: 1,3,4,5

Full practical report on mini-research project on a SARS-CoV2 incursion scenario

Write a full practical report on the mini-research project and submit your detailed laboratory notebook as PDF. The full practical report should contain the following subsections:

  • Title
  • Background and Introduction. See more details above for assessment task 2. Students are expected to incorporate feedback received previously. Approximate word count 400 and weighting of 25%.
  • Concise methodology. Approximate word count 300 and weighting of 13%.
  • Results. This section should describe the results obtained in the mini-research project and include figures and tables as appropriate. Figures and table legends are not included in the word count. Approximate word count 400 and weighting of 25%.
  • Discussion. This section should include interpretation of the results in the context of the learned course content so far. In addition, it should incorporate provided and self-identified scientific literature. It should also clearly highlight the limitation of the study and propose a small set of alternative approaches or future directions. Approximate word count 400 and weighting of 25%.
  • Reference list. Weighting of 2% for appropriate style only.


Students are also requested to submit the laboratory notebook as PDF version. No word limit. Weighting 10%.


The value of this assessment task is to incorporate previous detailed feedback to improve the background and introduction session. In addition, this assessment task provides student with the opportunity to summarise the mini-project concisely and discuss results critically. We will provide detailed instructions on how to write each specific subsection of the practical mini-research project report. We will provide overall feedback on the report and marks for each subsection. We will discuss commonly identified improvement areas and outstanding examples in class. This is designed to allow students to improve the full report for the second mini-research project (Assessment Task 4).


Word limit:

This task has an upper word limit of 1500 words. You will receive penalties if your report is over 10% longer than the word limit. The word count includes all words provided in main sections but not the reference section and figure/table legends. The penalties will be applied in 10% increments.

•            10-20% over the word limit -> 10% penalty.

•            20-30% over the word limit -> 20% penalty.

•            30-40% over the word limit -> 30% penalty.

•            … and so on.


Assessment task return:

We aspire to return your submission within 2 weeks.


Late penalties:

Late submissions are allowed but will be penalized as outlined below.

Assessment Task 5

Value: 30 %
Due Date: 09/06/2023
Return of Assessment: 19/06/2023
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5

Critical essay on a biosecurity case study

Choose a case study topic other than COVID-19 to write a critical assay.

The assay should include the following subsections:

  • Title.
  • Background and Introduction. This includes the biology of the organism and its potential impact.
  • Risk assessment and potential entry pathways.
  • Actual or likely outcome of the incursion.
  • Potential response to an incursion.
  • Lessons learnt.
  • References.


The value of this assessment task is to perform extensive online and literature searches on the case study of your choice. This is followed by critical evaluation and extraction of the most important information before providing an comprehensive, concise, and forward looking summary. We will provide detailed instructions on how to write each specific part of the case study. We will provide overall feedback on the case study.


Word limit:

This task has an upper word limit of 2400 words. You will receive penalties if your report is over 10% longer than the word limit. The word count includes all words provided in main sections but not the reference section and figure/table legends. The penalties will be applied in 10% increments.

•            10-20% over the word limit -> 10% penalty.

•            20-30% over the word limit -> 20% penalty.

•            30-40% over the word limit -> 30% penalty.

•            … and so on.


Assessment task return:

We aspire to return your submission within 2 weeks.


Late penalties:

Late submissions are allowed but will be penalized as outlined below.

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.


The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.


The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.

 

The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:

  • Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
  • Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material.

Returning Assignments

Assignments will be returned via Wattle. Feedback will be provided on Wattle and general feedback applicable to the whole class will be provided in class and via short explainer videos.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Resubmission of Assignments

Re-submissions of assignments is not possible for this course. However, students are encouraged to consider feedback obtained on the different assessment tasks (e.g. task 2 and 3) and to act on it in future assessment tasks (e.g task 3 and 4) as appropriate.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

AsPr Benjamin Schwessinger
Benjamin.schwessinger@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


AsPr Benjamin Schwessinger

By Appointment
Prof Peter Solomon
52284
peter.solomon@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Prof Peter Solomon

Dr Martyn Kirk
52284
martyn.kirk@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Dr Martyn Kirk

Dr Robyn Hall
52284
robyn.hall@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Dr Robyn Hall

Dr Simon Williams
simon.williams@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Dr Simon Williams

Rita Tam
u6149379@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Rita Tam

Rachel Leonard
52284
u6717805@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Rachel Leonard

Abigail Graetz
52284
u7068125@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Abigail Graetz

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions