• Class Number 2907
  • Term Code 3330
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 units
  • Mode of Delivery In Person
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • Dr Filip Slaveski
  • LECTURER
    • Dr Filip Slaveski
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 20/02/2023
  • Class End Date 26/05/2023
  • Census Date 31/03/2023
  • Last Date to Enrol 27/02/2023
SELT Survey Results

This course charts the history of Europe from the French Revolution until the outbreak of the First World War in 1914. As a survey course, it explores the history of modern Europe through the study of key episodes, trends, and ideas. It examines revolutions, such as the French Revolution and the Industrial Revolution; events such as the Congress of Vienna and the Dreyfus Affair; ideologies such as liberalism, socialism and nationalism; and wider processes of social and cultural change. Key themes include the shifting boundaries of European culture and identity; the development of states, nations, and empires; and the role of religion, war, race, class, and gender in the development of modern Europe.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

  1. analyse major developments, events, themes, and concepts in European history from the eighteenth century to the beginning of the twentieth century;
  2. assess the political, social, economic and cultural legacies of the topics examined for both Europe and the wider world;
  3. critically examine key historiographical and theoretical issues in modern European history;
  4. interpret diverse historical sources and forms of evidence; and
  5. construct evidence-based arguments.

Additional Course Costs

Students will need online access in order to access some recommended resources, and to undertake research for the assessment tasks. Students will also need access to a computer in order to submit the written assessments and self evaluations. Printing reading and assessment tasks is not required and not encouraged.

Required Resources

These are listed in the class structure and description on Wattle. All of them can be accessed for free, online, either directly through Wattle or via the University Library holdings or e-journal finder, at https://anulib.anu.edu.au/#tb3

William Simpson and Martin Jones (eds), Europe: 1783-1914, Third edition (London and New York: Routledge, 2015). Copies have been placed on two hour reserve in the library and are available for purchase in the Harry Hartog campus bookstore. The book can also be read online through the library website.



Staff Feedback

Students in EURO1004 will receive the following forms of feedback:

Course feedback: Feedback on how students performed as a whole will be provided in lectures following return of the primary source task and research essay.

Tutorial feedback: Feedback specific to each tutorial group will be provided in the tutorial following return of the primary source task and research essay. Tutors will also report back on informal student surveys conducted in week 6, offering synthesis of your feedback and suggestions of how the group might strengthen overall participation.

Individual written feedback This will be provided for the Primary Source Analysis and Research Essay.

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.

Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 Lecture: Welcome to EURO1044: What is Europe? What is the Modern era? Tutorial: Does Modern Europe matter? Tutorials begin. Tutorial participation (10%) applies every week and bonus points awarded for overall engagement in lectures and online learning activities.
2 Lecture: Europe and the French Revolution Tutorial: Approaches to the French Revolution
3 Lecture: Europe under Napoleon Tutorial: Assessing the impact of Napoleon
4 Lecture: Industrialising Europe and the rise of consumerism 1789-1914 Tutorial: Industrialisation and urbanisation Primary source analysis (10%) due by 4pm, Thu 16 March.
5 Lecture: Ideas of Modernity 1789-1914 Tutorial: Exploring modern ideas
6 Lecture: Restoration Europe Tutorial: Diplomacy and the Congress of Vienna
7 Lecture: Nationalism and Unification, 1815-71 Tutorial: Approaches to nationalism
8 Lecture: Revolutionary Europe, 1848 - “Revolutionary” Autocracy - Russia Tutorial: Transnational histories of revolution and its aftermath Research essay (40%) due by 4pm on Thu 27 April
9 Lecture: Making the Modern Working Class and the Agrarian base Tutorial: Marx and the Communist Manifesto and the Peasantry
10 Lecture: European Imperialism, 1848-1914 Tutorial: Reckoning with the imperial past - the role of the historian.
11 Lecture: Europe on the Eve of War Tutorial: Was war inevitable?
12 Lecture: Conclusion and Revision Tutorial: Study skills Take home exam (40%)

Tutorial Registration

Students will register for tutorials through ‘My Timetable'

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Due Date Learning Outcomes
Primary source analysis (10%) due 16 March 10 % 16/03/2023 4, 5
Research Essay (40%) due 27 April 40 % 27/04/2023 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Take home exam (40%) due 12 June 40 % 12/06/2023 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Participation (10%) 10 % * 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Examination(s)

See instructions for task 3

Assessment Task 1

Value: 10 %
Due Date: 16/03/2023
Learning Outcomes: 4, 5

Primary source analysis (10%) due 16 March

You will select one piece of primary evidence relating to Europe and the French Revolution or Europe under Napoleon (source ideas available on Wattle). You will explain the importance and usefulness of this piece of evidence to your reader and support your claims using secondary evidence.


Due by 4pm on16 March. Late essays will be penalised at the rate of 5% per working day or part thereof.


500 words. Overlength assignments will be penalised according to CASS policy, which states that a 10% penalty will be applied to essays that exceed the specified word limit over a 10% buffer.


Detailed guidelines, tips and resources will be available through Wattle.

Rubric

FailPassCreditDistinctionHigh Distinction

Identifying primary evidence


You have not

managed to identify

a primary source or

to justify the use of

the source you selected.

You demonstrate ability to identify primary sources and/or justify their use by historians.


You demonstrate ability to identify a useful primary sources and are beginning to show that you know how to persuade

your readers of its

significance.

You have identified a useful primary source and almost persuaded

your readers that it

is significance for study of the French Revolution or Europe under Napoleon.

You have identified a useful primary source and persuaded

your readers that it

is significance for study of the French Revolution or Europe under Napoleon.

Use of supporting

primary and

secondary evidence

to make a case

Your work shows

that you need to

learn more about

supporting your

claims with evidence.

You have used

primary and

secondary evidence

and are taking steps

to show that you

know how important

it is for supporting

your claims.

You have used

primary and

secondary evidence

and are beginning to

show that you know

how important it is for

persuading your

readers.

You have used

primary and

secondary evidence

and have almost

persuaded your

readers that it is

significant for study of the French Revolution or Europe under Napoleon.

You have used

primary and

secondary evidence

and persuaded your

readers that it is

significant for study of the French Revolution or Europe under Napoleon.

Historical argument and persuasion.

Your work shows

that you need to

learn more about

how to express and

sustain an argument

that is persuasive.

You are taking steps

to show how

important it is to let

your reader know

what your view is,

and to build that

view throughout

your writing.

You are beginning to

show that you know

how important it is

to express and to

build an argument

throughout your

writing.

Overall it is clear

what your argument

is, and you almost

always show that

you know how to

build the case for it

throughout your

writing.

It is crystal clear

what your argument

is, you build that

argument

throughout the

assessment task,

and it is persuasive

to your readers.

Clarity and

conciseness of

expression

You are not yet

writing with

confidence and need to learn more about effective academic writing.

You are taking steps

to show how

important it is to edit

your work and to use

expression that is

clear and accessible

to readers.

You are beginning to

show how important

written expression is

for persuading

readers.

You have shown

how important

written expression is

for persuading

readers and your

work needs only a

little fine tuning.

Your writing is

succinct and clear

and well-tuned to the format.

Creativity


You are not sure yet

what your approach

as a writer is and the

approaches of other

writers are currently

stronger in your

writing.

You are taking some

style steps that

show that you are

trying to distinguish

your approach as a

writer from that of

others. Your readers

encourage you to

keep trying.

You are working on finding your approach as a writer and you are trying out different things to help your readers. They appreciate your efforts and encourage you to

keep trying.

Your approach as an

author shines

through in parts of

this work and you

are clearly working

hard to help your

readers. They really

want to read more!

You write for your

readers with great flair and substance. they really want to read more!

Referencing

Your work shows

that you need to

learn more about,

and to apply

disciplinary and

academic

expectations about

acknowledgment of the

sources of

information you

have used.

You generally

acknowledge the

sources of

information you

have used in

accordance with the

expectations of the

discipline and

academic

community.

You acknowledge

the sources of

information you

have used in

accordance with the

expectations of the

discipline and academic

community.

You acknowledge

the sources of

information you

have used in

accordance with the

expectations of the

discipline and

academic community.

You acknowledge

the sources of

information you

have used in

accordance with the

expectations of the

discipline and

academic community.

Responsiveness to instructions and feedback

You have not built on advice and learning activities.


You have paid attention to activities and advice offered in class but haven't fully applied the principles to your own source analysis.


You have begun to build on learning activities and advice offered in class for the purposes of your own source analysis.

You have built on learning activities and advice offered in class for the purposes of your own source analysis.

You have been very effective in building on learning activities and advice offered in class for the purposes of your own source analysis.

Assessment Task 2

Value: 40 %
Due Date: 27/04/2023
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Research Essay (40%) due 27 April

You will undertake a research project using primary and secondary source material to provide an evidence based- response to a specific question.


Due by 4pm on 27 April. Late essays will be penalised at the rate of 5% per working day or part thereof.


2000 words. Overlength assignments will be penalised according to CASS policy, which states that a 10% penalty will be applied to essays that exceed the specified word limit over a 10% buffer.


Detailed guidelines, tips and resources will be available through Wattle.

Rubric

FailPassCreditDistinctionHigh Distinction

Use of supporting

primary and

secondary evidence

to make a case

Your work shows

that you need to

learn more about

supporting your

claims with evidence.

You have used

primary and

secondary evidence

and are taking steps

to show that you

know how important

it is for supporting

your claims.

You have used

primary and

secondary evidence

and are beginning to

show that you know

how important it for

persuading your

readers.

You have used

primary and

secondary evidence

and have almost

persuaded your

reader that it is

significant for the topic of your writing.

You have used

primary and

secondary evidence

and persuaded your

reader that it is significant for the topic of your writing.

Historical argument

and persuasion

Your work shows

that you need to

learn more about

how to express and

sustain an argument

that is persuasive.

You are taking steps

to show how

important it is to let

your reader know

what your view is,

and to build that

view throughout

your writing.

You are beginning to

show that you know

how important it is

to express and to

build an argument

throughout your

writing.

Overall it is clear

what your argument

is, and you almost

always show that

you know how to

build the case for it

throughout your

writing.

It is very clear

what your argument

is, you build that

argument

throughout the

assessment task,

and it is persuasive

to your readers.

Clarity and

conciseness of

expression

You are not yet

writing with

confidence and will need to pursue learning opportunities to develop your skills in academic writing.

You are taking some

style steps that

show that you are

trying to distinguish

your approach as a

writer from that of

others. Your readers

encourage you to

keep trying.

You are beginning to

show how important

written expression is

for persuading

readers.

You have shown

how important

written expression is

for persuading

readers and your

work needs only a

little fine-tuning.

It is very clear

what your argument

is, you build that

argument

throughout the

assessment task,

and it is persuasive

to your readers.

Creativity

You are not sure yet

what your approach

as a writer is and the

approaches of other

writers are currently

stronger in your

writing.

You are taking steps

to show how

important it is to edit

your work and to use

expression that is

clear and accessible

to readers

You are working on finding your approach  as a writer and you are trying out different things to help your readers. They appreciate your

efforts and encourage you to keep trying.


Your approach as an

author shines

through in parts of

this work and you

are clearly working

hard to help your

readers. They really

want to read more!

You write for your

readers with great flair and substance. They really want to read more!

Referencing

Your work shows

that you need to

learn more about,

and to apply

disciplinary and

academic

expectations about

acknowledgment of the

sources of

information you

have used.

You generally

acknowledge the

sources of

information you

have used in

accordance with the

expectations of the

discipline and

academic

community.

You acknowledge

the sources of

information you

have used in

accordance with the

expectations of the

discipline and academic

community.

You acknowledge

the sources of

information you

have used in

accordance with the

expectations of the

discipline and

academic community.

You acknowledge

the sources of

information you

have used in

accordance with the

expectations of the

discipline and

academic community.

Identifying different approaches


You have not yet demonstrated ability to identify differences in the ways historians approach their subject matter.

You have begun to identify differences in the ways historians approach their subject matter.

You can identify differences in the ways historians approach their subject matter and evaluate their arguments.

You demonstrate some understanding of different historiographical approaches to the themes examined, and ability to evaluate these approaches.

You demonstrate clear understanding of different historiographical approaches to the themes examined, and ability to evaluate these approaches.

Responsiveness to

Feedback

You have not yet

shown consistent

evidence of

identifying and of

responding to feedback.

You are

beginning to show

signs of responding

well to feedback.

You are showing signs of responding

effectively to feedback.

You are responding to feedback consistently and effectively.

You are responding to feedback consistently and using it to become a better historian.

Assessment Task 3

Value: 40 %
Due Date: 12/06/2023
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Take home exam (40%) due 12 June

You will be given one week to complete an open book take home exam in the comfort of the library or your home.


The task will become available during will take place during the formal exam period. It will be made available through Wattle on 5 June at 10 am and all students must submit by 10am on 12 June. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examination.


2000 words. Overlength assignments will be penalised according to CASS policy, which states that a 10% penalty will be applied to essays that exceed the specified word limit over a 10% buffer.


Detailed guidelines, tips and resources will be available through Wattle.

Rubric

FailPassCreditDistinctionHigh Distinction

Use of supporting

primary and

secondary evidence

to make a case

Your work shows

that you need to

learn more about

supporting your

claims with evidence.

You have used

primary and

secondary evidence

and are taking steps

to show that you

know how important

it is for supporting

your claims.

You have used

primary and

secondary evidence

and are beginning to

show that you know

how important it for

persuading your

readers.

You have used

primary and

secondary evidence

and have almost

persuaded your

reader that it is

significant for the topic of your writing.

You have used

primary and

secondary evidence

and persuaded your

reader that it is significant for the topic of your writing.

Historical argument

and persuasion

Your work shows

that you need to

learn more about

how to express and

sustain an argument

that is persuasive.

You are taking steps

to show how

important it is to let

your reader know

what your view is,

and to build that

view throughout

your writing.

You are beginning to

show that you know

how important it is

to express and to

build an argument

throughout your

writing.

Overall it is clear

what your argument

is, and you almost

always show that

you know how to

build the case for it

throughout your

writing.

It is very clear

what your argument

is, you build that

argument

throughout the

assessment task,

and it is persuasive

to your readers.

Clarity and

conciseness of

expression

You are not yet

writing with

confidence and will need to pursue learning opportunities to develop your skills in academic writing.

You are taking steps

to show how

important it is to edit

your work and to use

expression that is

clear and accessible

to readers

You are beginning to

show how important

written expression is

for persuading

readers.

You have shown

how important

written expression is

for persuading

readers and your

work needs only a

little fine-tuning.

Your writing is

succinct, clear and well-tuned to the format.


Creativity

You are not sure yet

what your approach

as a writer is and the

approaches of other

writers are currently

stronger in your

writing.

You are taking some

style steps that

show that you are

trying to distinguish

your approach as a

writer from that of

others. Your readers

encourage you to

keep trying.

You are working on finding your approach as a writer and you are trying out different things to help your readers. They appreciate your

efforts and encourage you to keep trying.

Your approach as an

author shines

through in parts of

this work and you

are clearly working

hard to help your

readers. They really

want to read more!

You write for your

readers with great flair and substance. They really want to read more!

Engagement with historians

Your work shows

that you need to

learn more about,

and to apply

disciplinary and

academic

expectations about engagement with historiography and

acknowledgment of the

sources of

information you

have used.

You generally

acknowledge the

sources of

information you

have used, and the

work of other historians, in

accordance with the

expectations of the

discipline and

academic

community. You have some idea about the different approaches used by historians.

You acknowledge

the sources of

information you

have used, and the

work of other historians, in

accordance with the

expectations of the

discipline and academic

community. You demonstrate some understanding of different approaches to the issues examined.

You acknowledge

the sources of

information you

have used, and the

work of other historians, in

accordance with the

expectations of the

discipline and

academic community. You demonstrate understanding of different approaches to the issues examined.

You acknowledge

the sources of

information you

have used, and the

work of other historians, in

accordance with the

expectations of the

discipline and

academic community. You are able to successfully evaluate different historiographical approaches to the issues examined.

Responsiveness to

Feedback

You have not yet

shown consistent

evidence of

identifying and of

responding to feedback.



You are

beginning to show

signs of responding

well to feedback.

You are showing signs of responding

effectively to feedback.


You are responding to feedback consistently and effectively.

You are responding to feedback consistently and using it to become a better historian.

Assessment Task 4

Value: 10 %
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Participation (10%)

Participation is 10% of your final grade and is based on the quality of your participation in tutorials over the course of the semester. Students do not receive grades for attendance and will need to actively participate in order to pass this component of assessment. Active participation is more than simply showing up and talking. It requires active engagement with the learning material and the learning group. Students will be assessed on the quality of their evidence-based observations and their ability to enrich group discussion and the learning experiences of their peers.


The criteria for active participation is laid out in the rubric below.


Additional tips on active participation will be available through Wattle.


Note: Tutorial attendance is mandatory. Students who miss more than two tutorials will be required to explain their absence and may need to provide supporting documentary evidence. While bonus points will be awarded for participation in lectures and online learning activities, your grade will be primarily based upon your ten best tutorial performances.



Rubric

FailPassCreditDistinctionHigh Distinction

Communication

You are having a

hard time following

instructions and/ or responding to activities clearly and succinctly.

You generally understand verbal instructions and are taking steps to demonstrate understanding of the importance of clear and succinct communication.

You understand

verbal instructions

well and are

beginning to show

how you formulate

clear and succinct

responses

You understand

verbal instructions

very well and frequently respond to

activities clearly and

succinctly and in

ways that helps

others to

understand.

You understand

verbal instructions

very well and

respond to activities

clearly and

succinctly and in a

way that helps

others to

understand. You

Generosity

You need to work on

your listening skills

and you have not

shown evidence of

taking the time to

encourage others,

thank them for

good ideas, or respond in ways that keeps discussion flowing.

You nearly always listen to others with courtesy. You are taking steps to

encourage others,

thank them for

good ideas, and respond respond in ways that keeps discussion flowing.

You listen to others with courtesy. You are demonstrating ability to

encourage others,

thank them for

good ideas, and respond respond in ways that keeps discussion flowing.

You listen to others with courtesy. You frequently

encourage others to join in. You show appreciation when your colleagues offer good ideas. You demonstrate clear awareness of the positive impact of others on the development of your own ideas.


You listen to others with courtesy. You always

encourage others to join in. You show appreciation when your colleagues offer good ideas. You demonstrate clear awareness of the positive impact of others on the development of your own ideas.

Persistence

You struggle to stick

with activities and to

identify strategies to

help you solve

difficult problems.

You sometimes need

help to get through

activities. You are

taking steps to show

that you can make a

strategy to work

through a problem.

You almost always

hang in there with

activities and ideas.

You are beginning to

show evidence of

formulating practical

and realistic steps in

response to

problems.

You hang in there

with activities and

ideas. You are

almost always

realistic and

practical when

thinking about what

you need to do to

break through a

problem

You hang in there

with activities and

ideas, even when

you are being

challenged. You are

realistic and

practical when

thinking about what

you need to do to

break through a

problem

Use of evidence and course materials

Your participation

shows that you have

not kept up with the

ideas covered in

learning activities and/or that you need to learn more about backing up

your claims.

You are taking steps

to show that you

know how important

it is to back up your

claims, and you

show awareness of

the ideas covered in

assigned reading and learning activities.

You are beginning to show evidence of

backing up your

claims and show

awareness of the

ideas covered in

assigned reading and learning activities.

You almost always back up your claims with evidence and show mastery of materials set for learning activities and supplementary material recommended throughout semester.


You always back up your claims with evidence and show mastery of materials set for learning activities and supplementary material recommended throughout semester.


Creativity

You are not yet sure

how or when to

express your ideas about the activities.

You take the

occasional leap and

sometimes land your

take on activities.

Hang in there and

keep on refining your approach to active participation.

You take the

occasional leap and

often land your take on activities. Your teachers and classmates want to

encourage you on.

Your style of approach to activities is

beginning to shine

through and your

teachers and

classmates see your

approach positively.

You have a clear style of approach. Your classmates and

teachers find your responses thoughtful, engaging, and substantive.

Responsiveness to

feedback

You have not yet

shown evidence of

revised approaches

to activities or ideas

on the basis of

feedback from your

teachers or

classmates.

You are taking steps

to strengthen your

approaches and

ideas in response to

the feedback of your

teachers and

classmates.

You are beginning to

show an ability to

revise your approaches and ideas in response to

the feedback of your

teachers and classmates.

You show an ability

to revise your

approaches and ideas in response to the feedback of your

teachers and sometimes in

response to your

classmates

You show an ability

to revise your

approaches and

ideas in response to

the feedback of your

teachers and

classmates

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.


The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.


The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.

 

The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

No hardcopy submission is required for this course.

Late Submission

Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material.

Returning Assignments

Grades and feedback are released via the WATTLE site for the course, by the dates indicated in the Assessment Tasks descriptions above.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Resubmission of Assignments

Resubmitted or drafts of assignments are not accepted in EURO1004.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

Dr Filip Slaveski
u1119421@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Dr Filip Slaveski -

Dr Filip Slaveski

By Appointment
By Appointment
Dr Filip Slaveski
filip.slaveski@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Dr Filip Slaveski

By Appointment
By Appointment

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions