- Class Number 5059
- Term Code 3360
- Class Info
- Unit Value 6 units
- Mode of Delivery In Person
- Dr Rosanne Kennedy
- Dr Rosanne Kennedy
- Class Dates
- Class Start Date 24/07/2023
- Class End Date 27/10/2023
- Census Date 31/08/2023
- Last Date to Enrol 31/07/2023
An introduction to the field of cultural studies, this unit progresses through a “circuit of culture”. Using this model, it introduces the key concepts and practices of representation, identity, production, consumption and regulation. Two areas of contemporary culture will be of particular interest to this unit:
(1) issues surrounding advertising, corporate power and globalisation, and
(2) debates about the representation of gender and sexuality in the media and popular culture.
In the first half of the course, students will learn to use semiotics, a method that is widely used by cultural and feminist critics to study how meanings are produced in images and texts. Coupling semiotics with theories of identity, subjectivity, ideology and discourse students will analyse power relationships in popular culture. Students will also become familiar with debates relating to production and consumption. Upon completing the course requirements, students will have experience in applying core methods and theories analytically, and will be able to demonstrate critical reflection on key concepts shared by cultural and gender studies.
Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
Upon successful completion of this course, students will have
the knowledge and skills to:
- understand the central model for this course: the 'circuit of culture';
- master a variety of tools for cultural studies and be able to use them in a concrete study of cultural practices, commodities, images, and social media campaigns in contemporary culture;
- become familiar with developments and current debates within the field of cultural studies in a digital era, particularly issues surrounding; advertising, identity and gender;
- improve skills in independent research and in written and oral communication.
In addition to the required reading, the following texts will be useful for clarifying your understanding of concepts and methods and completing assignments:
Du Gay, Paul et al. Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman. 2nd ed., California SAGE, 2013. [Hancock TK7881.6.D65 1997]
Williamson, Judith. Decoding Advertisements: Ideology and Meaning in Advertising. 1978. Marion Boyars, 2002. [Chifley HF5821.W54 2002] [ANU eBook]
Decoding Advertisements is useful for Weeks 3 to 5 and for completing the second assessment, a semiotic analysis. Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman (on short loan) introduces the concepts on the Circuit of Culture and shows how to use them to do a cultural analysis. If you are uncertain of how to do a cultural analysis (required for the final essay), this textbook is a good start. Gerard Goggin uses the Circuit to analyse mobile phones in his book, Cell Phone Culture: Mobile Technology in Everyday Life (2006). [Chifley HM851 .G645 2006]
An extensive bibliography of supplementary readings is included on Wattle under each topic. Students should use these for writing their final essay.
The following texts provide a general introduction to Cultural Studies and material covered in the course. Although they are useful resources, students are not required to purchase them. They are on short loan in the Chifley Library where possible.
Barker, Chris. The SAGE Dictionary of Cultural Studies. SAGE Publications, 2004.
Barker, Chris, and Emma A. Jane. Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. 5th ed., SAGE, 2016.
Stokes, Jane. How to Do Media and Cultural Studies. 2nd ed., SAGE Publications, 2012.
Storey, John. Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction. Routledge, 2015.
Webb, Jen. Understanding Representation. SAGE Publications, 2009.
Journals for browsing (this list is by no means exhaustive):
Camera Obscura (feminism, culture and media studies)
Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies
Cultural Studies ? Critical Methodologies
European Journal of Cultural Studies
Feminist Media Studies
differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies
International Journal of Cultural Studies
Journal of Popular Culture
Media, Culture & Society
Theory, Culture & Society
Whether you are on campus or studying remotely, there are a variety of online platforms you will use to participate in your study program. These could include videos for lectures and other instruction, two-way video conferencing for interactive learning, email and other messaging tools for communication, interactive web apps for formative and collaborative activities, print and/or photo/scan for handwritten work and drawings, and home-based assessment.
ANU outlines recommended student system requirements to ensure you are able to participate fully in your learning. Other information is also available about the various Learning Platforms you may use.
Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:
- written comments
- verbal comments
- feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc
Please Note: The point of feedback in this class is to help students improve their work. Thus, the feedback on the short essay on representation and the semiotic analysis is formative - it aims to build skills. In keeping with this class goal, students are strongly encouraged to go into Wattle and read the feedback on their assignments. If a student submits the short essay on representation but does NOT pick up the feedback, they will NOT be given feedback on the semiotic analysis. There is no point in tutors providing detailed feedback if students do not read it. Tutors can see if students pick up their feedback because an icon of head pops up if the student has accessed the feedback via Wattle. If students do not pick up the feedback on their Semiotic Analysis, they will NOT receive comments on the final essay.
ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.
A 10% allowance for submitted work, in addition to the figure listed for each assignment is permitted. After that, the CASS Education Committee has stipulated a penalty of 10% be deducted from the grade awarded for the essay. In-text citations and quotations should be included in the final word count. Reference lists at the end of an essay should not contribute to the word count.
Applying for an Extension
Students must apply through the Wattle course site if they wish to ask for an extension of time to submit. Extensions can only be granted in documented cases of illness or genuine personal difficulty. Requests for extensions must be made before the due date; otherwise a late penalty will apply.
College of Arts and Social Sciences Extension Policy:
Extensions will not be granted retrospectively, except in medical emergencies or on the advice of the Access and Inclusion.
Extensions will be granted only for medical conditions, bereavement, other compelling reasons as determined by the course convenor or on the advice of Access and Inclusion. Extensions on medical grounds require a medical certificate.
Extensions will not normally be granted because of conflicts with other study commitments, work commitments, holidays, family gatherings, competing assessment deadlines, sporting commitments or commitments to student organisations.
Even when an extension has been granted, assignments will not normally be accepted beyond the date when assessment on that question/topic has been returned to other students enrolled in the course. If a student is unable to submit assessment by that time, alternative assessment may be set by the course convenor.
For more information, see: http://cass.anu.edu.au/current-students/coursework-policy-and-guidelines/late-submissions-andextensions
|Summary of Activities
|Introduction: Making Sense of Culture
|Representation, Race and Gender
|Semiotics: Gender as a Sign System
|Applied Semiotics: Advertising & Its Mythologies
|Short paper due Aug 17
|The Subject: Ideology & Discourse
|Production of Culture/Cultures of Production
|Semiotic Analysis due Sept 7
|Monday Holiday, no class this week, prep for Final Essay
|Feminism and Popular Culture in a Neoliberal Era
|The Circuit of Culture in the 21st Century: Limits and Opportunities
|No tutes; Final Essay due Nov 7
Tutorial RegistrationANU utilises MyTimetable to enable students to view the timetable for their enrolled courses, browse, then self-allocate to small teaching activities / tutorials so they can better plan their time. Find out more on the Timetable webpage.
|Short Paper on Representation (10%)
|Semiotic Analysis (30%)
|Final Essay (45%)
|Tutorial participation (9%)
|In class presentation, once in semester, worth 6%
* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details
ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:
- Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure
- Special Assessment Consideration Guideline and General Information
- Student Surveys and Evaluations
- Deferred Examinations
- Student Complaint Resolution Policy and Procedure
- Code of practice for teaching and learning
The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.
Moderation of Assessment
Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.
Assessment Task 1
Learning Outcomes: 2,4
Short Paper on Representation (10%)
Due: 17 August, 11 pm
Students will be required to respond to the following question:
Is the image pictured below a representation? Discuss.
The image for this task will be posted on Wattle.
In answering the question, students should draw on the relevant readings and concepts from the course (e.g. Hall, Mitchell, Webb, etc) to argue whether they regard the image as a representation. Students should define the concept of representation, and explain how meaning is produced.
A works cited list is required. A marking rubric will be posted on Wattle.
Estimated return date: Friday, 1 September (if submitted on time)
Answer – coherent explication of the concept of representation, and how representation produces meaning, supported by course readings
Analysis – considered application of the concept of representation to the image
Structure – clearly and concisely written, in their own words (some quotation is acceptable, but students must explain quotes and paraphrase appropriately)
Referencing – works cited list in which each work is appropriately referenced
A High Distinction response will demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the concept of representation and ability to use the concept to answer the question, and will be very well-written and presented.
A Distinction response will demonstrate a strong understanding of the concept of representation and an ability to use the concept to answer the question, and will be well-written and presented.
A Credit response will demonstrate a solid understanding of the concept of representation and ability to use the concept to answer the question. There may be some problems (sentence and paragraph structure; spelling and grammar mistakes).
A Pass response will demonstrate a basic understanding of the concept of representation and ability to use the concept to answer the question. A Pass response may have significant writing problems (structure; spelling and grammar mistakes).
A Fail essay will demonstrate misunderstanding of the concept and how to apply it to the image; there will be serious flaws with comprehension, writing and presentation.
Assessment Task 2
Learning Outcomes: 2,4
Semiotic Analysis (30%)
Due: 7 September, 11 pm
As part of the profession, Cultural Studies scholars regularly provide semiotic readings of representations, particularly advertisements. By breaking down and analysing representations that are usually taken for granted, a semiotic analysis helps to decode the meanings, myths, and ideologies that they construct. This task is designed to help students practice their skills in semiotics. The aim is to use semiotics to analyse how a print advertisement uses signs to produce meanings and mythologies. Students are required to use the appropriate theoretical terminology – i.e., terms from Saussure, Barthes, and Williamson, which have been introduced in lectures and tutorials.
For this assignment, students are required to choose a print advertisement (i.e. an ad from a magazine or newspaper) that you find particularly meaningful (for instance, it is clever, confusing, offensive, or otherwise controversial). Then, using Williamson, Barthes, and Althusser’s semiotic and conceptual terms, analyse the range and composition of signs and sign systems used in the ad to produce its meaning.
How do the semiotic elements construct the ad’s meaning/s?
What is the mythology (or mythologies) the ad produces?
Who is the ad addressed to? Is it a successful ad?
Students will be expected to show knowledge of and ability to use a range of semiotics terms appropriately. No external research outside of course material is required.
A detailed guide to writing this analysis and a marking rubric will be posted on Wattle.
Content – identifies and engages with relevant semiotic terminology;
Answer – a considered argument is made that clearly answers the question;
Analysis – application of the semiotic terminology to the chosen advertisement is original and offers some critical insight;
Structure – clearly and concisely written, in their own words
Referencing – works cited list in which each work is appropriately referenced.
Assessment Task 3
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4
Final Essay (45%)
Due: 7 Nov, 11 pm
Students will be required to use the circuit of culture to analyse a cultural practice, object, brand, celebrity, campaign or other relevant case. Case studies can include an advocacy campaign, TV series, food item, clothing, sport, advertising campaign, piece of technology, book or film, or a cultural practice (e.g. Uber, memes, Netflix, Twitter, animal rights, veganism, Instagram, Snapchat) that interests them.
More information on this assignment will be provided by week 7.
Assessment Task 4
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4
Tutorial participation (9%)
There will be nine tutorials; 1% per tutorial. Your tutorial mark will be based on tutorial preparation and engaged participation in tutorial activities each week.
Students are expected to attend all tutorials and to be prepared for discussion (ie, having done the reading and thought about it). Students will be assessed on a meaningful contribution to class discussion over the semester. If you are present but do not engage your mark will be lower. If students have an unavoidable appointment at the same time as their assigned tutorial, they must make arrangements with their tutor to attend another tutorial.
In assessing student participation, the following criteria will be considered:
- regular participation in tutorial discussions;
- demonstration of preparation (i.e. done the reading and thought about it);
- demonstration of understanding of or engagement with the topic;
- raising relevant questions, points and challenges; and
- listening actively and responding to others in a constructive fashion.
Contributing to discussions can be difficult for some students, especially those who have English as a Second Language (ESL), but they are reminded that there are different ways of contributing to tutorial discussion:
- giving an example to illustrate what someone else has said;
- agreeing, but adding some suggestions;
- comparing what has been said to something else;
- disagreeing—and giving their reasons; and/or
- asking a question or introducing a new topic.
Listening actively is also part of participation. Students can show that they are participating by looking interested, which means:
looking at the person who is talking;
- showing by their body language that they belong to the group (e.g. moving their chair to be part of the group, not hiding behind other people, sit forward); and
- showing reactions to what people are saying in their facial expressions (e.g. nodding, smiling, frowning).
Assessment Task 5
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4
In class presentation, once in semester, worth 6%
Sign up online for the week and topic of their choice.
Students are required to give a tutorial presentation (max 5 mins.) once during the semester. The presentation should introduce and explain one of the key concepts from the week’s reading and find an example (e.g. images, YouTube videos, other cultural artefacts) to illustrate how the concept can be applied. A good presentation will end with a question(s) as a means of stimulating class discussion. Students must email or speak with the lecturer at the tutorial THE WEEK BEFORE the presentation to say what reading or concept they will present. Students should submit their powerpoint or presentation materials by midnight the night before the tutorial in which the presentation will be given.
Students may choose to work collaboratively with one other student on the week’s topic, each presenting different aspects and examples, but integrated into a coherent whole. Presentations should be a max of 5 mins if solo; 8-9 mins if working together.
For example, in the week on applied semiotics, one student might explain some of the concepts that Judith Williamson introduces, such as ‘objective correlative’ or ‘product as signified’. Explain what the concepts mean, and find specific examples to illustrate the concepts, and work through them with the class. The other student might explain Barthes’ concept of ‘myth’ as a second-order signifying system, and present an example to explain this concept.
Students will be assessed on the presentation. Only the power point needs to be submitted.
The assessment aims to give students the opportunity to:
1. develop their presentation skills;
2. practice explaining a concept;
3. show how the concept can be applied to particular examples.
4. share an example of their own choosing with the class
Students will be assessed on the following:
Concept – explanation of the concept(s): was the concept clearly introduced and explained? Did the presentation demonstrate a thorough understanding of the concept?
Example – choice of example(s): was the example or case study appropriate for illustrating the concept? Was the example(s) interesting, innovative, and insightful?
Presentation – delivery of the presentation: was the material presented in an engaging, clear and coherent way? Did the student presenter engage the class effectively, for instance in applying the concept to an example(s)? Were the slides and/or visuals clear and easy to read?
Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.
The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.
The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.
The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.
You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.
For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.
Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.
The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material.
If assignments are submitted on time, the course team will endeavour to return them within 2-3 weeks, and well before the next assignment is due.
Extensions and Penalties
Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.
Resubmission of Assignments
Resubmission of assessment is not permitted in this course.
Distribution of grades policy
Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.
Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.
Support for students
The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).
- ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
- ANU Access and inclusion for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
- ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
- ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
- ANU Counselling Centre promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
- ANUSA supports and represents undergraduate and ANU College students
- PARSA supports and represents postgraduate and research students
Dr Rosanne Kennedy