• Class Number 4685
  • Term Code 3350
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 units
  • Topic Online
  • Mode of Delivery Online
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • Dr Jarrett Blaustein
  • LECTURER
    • Dr Jarrett Blaustein
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 17/07/2023
  • Class End Date 08/09/2023
  • Census Date 28/07/2023
  • Last Date to Enrol 28/07/2023
SELT Survey Results

This course is designed to help individual professionals and organisations understand and apply contemporary Australian and international approaches to effective regulation. Regulatory issues covered include regulatory complexity, risk assessment, responsiveness, compliance, regulating technology and managing stakeholders. It is for people who are currently managing regulatory portfolios and projects in government agencies (e.g. Access Canberra (ACT))—or who will do so in future. It also supports professionals who work with regulatory stakeholders, including business and industry, Territory, State and Federal government agencies, the legislature, community actors and the media. Adopting an applied approach, the course uses case studies, hands-on assessments and recognised examples of regulatory excellence from Australia, Europe, North America and Asia and the Pacific. In doing so, it facilitates a collaborative learning environment that draws on regulatory scholarship as well as the experience of different regulatory actors and course participants.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

  1. Identify and define core ideas in regulation and compliance;
  2. Demonstrate advanced theories that inform foundational regulatory ideas;
  3. Describe and debate the advantages and limits of different regulatory instruments and approaches in the Australian context;
  4. Analyze the role and influence of a diverse range of regulatory actors;
  5. Demonstrate an understanding and interpret selected Australian and international case studies and apply these insights to everyday regulatory challenges in the ACT
  6. Interpret selected Australian and international case studies and apply these insights to everyday regulatory challenges.

Whether you are on campus or studying online, there are a variety of online platforms you will use to participate in your study program. These could include videos for lectures and other instruction, two-way video conferencing for interactive learning, email and other messaging tools for communication, interactive web apps for formative and collaborative activities, print and/or photo/scan for handwritten work and drawings, and home-based assessment.

ANU outlines recommended student system requirements to ensure you are able to participate fully in your learning. Other information is also available about the various Learning Platforms you may use.

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

  • written comments
  • verbal comments
  • feedback to whole class, groups and individuals

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.

Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 Briefing for Written Reflection Assessment Presentation and Discussion
2 Briefing for Business Memo Assessment Presentation and Discussion
3 Briefing for Group Presentations Presentation and Discussion
4 Independent Group Work for Presentations Group Work
5 Briefing for Individual Reflection Assessment Presentation and Discussion

Tutorial Registration

ANU utilises MyTimetable to enable students to view the timetable for their enrolled courses, browse, then self-allocate to small teaching activities / tutorials so they can better plan their time. Find out more on the Timetable webpage.

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Learning Outcomes
Class participation 10 % 2,3,4
Written reflection 10 % 1,2
Business memo 30 % 2,3,4,5
Group project 15 % 2,3,4,5
Individual reflection on group work 30 % 2,3,4,5
Post-course quiz 5 % 2

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Assessment Task 1

Value: 10 %
Learning Outcomes: 2,3,4

Class participation

To receive the maximum marks available for this assessment item, you need to:

(a) ask at least two questions during a classroom session during the course; OR

(b) make at least two comments?during a classroom session during the course; OR

(c) suggest at least two examples of a concept or problem?during a classroom session during the course. 

Assessment Task 2

Value: 10 %
Learning Outcomes: 1,2

Written reflection

This assessment requires you to write a 300–500-word response to one of the readings for the course that introduces a major regulatory concept or idea. You need to set out the key idea that the author is presenting; you do not need to refer to any other material. Ideally you will also identify a situation or setting in which you can see that idea in action. You might also want to comment on the limitations of the idea or some complicating factors that the author - or that you - identify. This is intended to be a short, quick writing exercise. Please submit this through Wattle

Assessment Task 3

Value: 30 %
Learning Outcomes: 2,3,4,5

Business memo

In this assignment, you are asked to write a business memo to your actual or fictional lead manager or agency head. In the memo you will identify a regulatory problem or approach that could be addressed by using some of the insights that you have gained from the course (readings and class discussion). Please advise them on how to proceed, and what issues they will need to consider in order to do so. The memo should be no longer than 750 words. The memo can be in any form: you are welcome to use your employer's style or a generic style.


All of the work for this assessment item and for others is protected by confidentiality. If you chose a real issue that you are engaged with, your memo will not be shared beyond the course convenor and instructors. 

Assessment Task 4

Value: 15 %
Learning Outcomes: 2,3,4,5

Group project

The group project provides a collaborative work opportunity for students to draw on and apply theory, concepts and insights from course case studies to develop a regulatory response to a complex real-life issue. In groups of 4-5, students can focus on one of the following options:

-A pressing regulatory problem in the ACT, within Australia or within our region;

-A new regulatory issue that is not yet well understood;

-A case study of a future technology-related concern. 

The project has two components: (1) an oral presentation (approx. 15-20 mins), and (2) visual and textual materials to support the explanation of the proposed response as well as relevant conditions, challenges and actors. Students may draw on their work experience. Instructors will provide verbal feedback immediately following the presentation and written feedback within a week of the final presentation. 

Assessment Task 5

Value: 30 %
Learning Outcomes: 2,3,4,5

Individual reflection on group work

This assessment item is your own individual writeup of the group work assignment. Your reflection should be between 2,000-3,000 words. Please use and refer to readings that you have done for this course, and any other reading that you have done when researching your group topic. 

Assessment Task 6

Value: 5 %
Learning Outcomes: 2

Post-course quiz

Demonstrate knowledge of about relevant theories to applied contexts.

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.


The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.


The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.

 

The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment, a direct link to which will be provided via the course website. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment, hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet, which is provided through the course website. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

Dr Jarrett Blaustein
<p>u1126224@anu.edu.au</p>

Research Interests


Technology and Regulation, Responsible Innovation

Dr Jarrett Blaustein

By Appointment
Sunday
Dr Jarrett Blaustein
jarrett.blaustein@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Technology and Regulation, Responsible Innovation

Dr Jarrett Blaustein

By Appointment
Sunday

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions