The Master of Science Communication Research Project involves a substantive investigation of an approved topic in science communication.

Students devise their own science communication research project in collaboration with the supervisor, or can pursue a topic already offered by the supervisor. The project should be devised and conducted with journal publication in mind as the desired end goal.

The course can be taken as 18 or 24 units completed within a single semester, or two consecutive semesters. Students will complete a minimum of 18 units in this course, but students who hope to use the Master of Science Communication program as a stepping stone to higher degree research are advised to complete a total of 24 units. The course convener can advise on this decision.

• The 18-unit version of the course entails a research project with a significant original component, aspiring to professional-level data collection and analysis, with ethics approval required for any human participant element. 
• The 24-unit version of the course involves a research project as for the 18-unit version, plus compulsory research methods training. This training could involve completing specific, externally provided research training activities (such as the online courses offered by the Statistical Consulting Unit) to an acceptable standard, or completing a 4000 word literature review on relevant research methods to an acceptable standard, or similar. The research methods training is a hurdle requirement which doesn't contribute to the final mark, but has to be completed to pass the course. The course convener will set and assess this item, in consultation with the supervisor and student.

Students must discuss their project ideas with the course convener prior to enrolling in the course to ensure they enrol in the appropriate version and that an appropriate supervisor can be found.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

1. Plan and engage in an independent and sustained critical investigation and evaluation of a chosen research topic.
2. Systematically identify relevant theory and concepts, relate these to appropriate methodologies and evidence, and draw appropriate conclusions.
3. Engage in systematic discovery and critical review of appropriate and relevant information sources.
4. Appropriately apply statistical or other evaluation processes to original data.
5. Understand and apply ethical standards of conduct in the collection and evaluation of data and other resources.
6. Communicate research concepts and contexts clearly and effectively both in writing and orally.

Research-Led Teaching

The entire course is devoted to developing research skills and conducting original science communication research for potential publication. Students will learn core knowledge about conducting science communication research and will implement that, will be asked to reflect on their research journey, and will translate their research for a broader audience.

Recommended Resources

Recommended student system requirements 

ANU courses commonly use a number of online resources and activities including:

• video material, similar to YouTube, for lectures and other instruction
• two-way video conferencing for interactive learning
• email and other messaging tools for communication
• interactive web apps for formative and collaborative activities
• print and photo/scan for handwritten work
• home-based assessment.

To fully participate in ANU learning, students need:

• A computer or laptop. Mobile devices may work well but in some situations a computer/laptop may be more appropriate.
• Webcam
• Speakers and a microphone (e.g. headset)
• Reliable, stable internet connection. Broadband recommended. If using a mobile network or wi-fi then check performance is adequate.
• Suitable location with minimal interruptions and adequate privacy for classes and assessments.
• Printing, and photo/scanning equipment

For more information please see https://www.anu.edu.au/students/systems/recommended-student-system-requirements

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

• written comments
• verbal discussion to clarify, upon student request.

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.

Other Information

In this course you will engage in self-directed research most of the time, under supervision. Most of the hours you devote to the course will be spent this way. The convener will also organise workshops, in which you will receive training in writing review papers, writing research papers, human participant ethics, authorship ethics, writing for 'The Conversation', and the journal paper publication process. These are not compulsory, but you are strongly encouraged to attend them in your first semester of enrolment. Provision can be made for students to attend virtually via Skype or similar upon request.

• The 18-unit version of the course entails a research project with a significant original component, aspiring to professional-level data collection and analysis, with ethics approval required for any human participant element.
• The 24-unit version of the course involves a research project as for the 18-unit version, plus compulsory research methods training. This training could involve completing specific, externally provided research training activities (such as the online courses offered by the Statistical Consulting Unit) to an acceptable standard, or completing a 4000 word literature review on relevant research methods to an acceptable standard, or similar. The research methods training is a hurdle requirement which doesn't contribute to the final mark, but has to be completed to pass the course. The course convener will set and assess this item, in consultation with the supervisor and student.

Projects must be completed within a single semester, or within two consecutive semesters.

The possible enrolment patterns are detailed in Wattle. The course can be taken as 18 or 24 units. The default is 18 units, but students who hope to use the Master of Science Communication program as a stepping stone to higher degree research such as a PhD are advised to enrol in the 24 unit version of the course. The course convener can advise on this decision.

In rare circumstances where students are compelled to take a semester off study for

external or personal reasons, an exemption to this rule may be granted, and a student may

be given permission to complete the project over two non-consecutive semesters.

Time commitment, workshops and role of supervisor

You are expected to devote approximately 10 hours per week to the course for every 6 units of enrolment. That means a 6 unit enrolment in one semester will require a total of 120-150 hours of work from you. In total, an 18 unit enrolment will require 360-450 hours of work, and a 24 unit enrolment will require 480-600 hours of work.

For the first 6 weeks of your first semester of enrolment, you are strongly encouraged to attend the workshop organised by the convener, covering topics of

importance to science communication research, as outlined above. In the first week back after the teaching break we will have our final workshop, in which you will be expected to

prepare a 5-10 minute summary of your project to share with the group (if you attend). All these workshops will also be attended by students in the undergraduate equivalent of this

course, SCOM3003, who are completing a smaller research project.

In addition to the workshops and private study time, you will work with a supervisor who will guide your project. You should talk to your supervisor about how regularly you want to

meet to discuss your project, and what other support they can offer you. Generally speaking you will be entitled to about 12 hours of your supervisor's time across the duration of the project. This might take the form of fortnightly meetings across the two semesters (not during teaching breaks) or you might instead want to ask them to read and

give feedback on a piece of writing as you work towards completion.

If you need a staff member's assistance beyond those 12 hours, approach the course convener.

Class Schedule

Week/Session	Summary of Activities	Assessment
1	Students will engage in self-directed research for most of the course, under supervision. The convener will organise two workshops/meetings (at the start and end of semester) for training in writing review papers, writing research papers, human participant ethics, authorship ethics, writing for 'The Conversation', and the journal paper publication process. They will also organise informal meetings throughout the semester to share progress and receive peer support, together with SCOM3003. These are not compulsory, but students are strongly encouraged to attend them. Provision can be made for students to attend virtually via Zoom or similar upon request. The course can be taken as 18 or 24 units. The default is 18 units, but students who hope to use the Master of Science Communication program as a stepping stone to higher degree research such as a PhD are advised to enrol in the 24 unit version of the course. The course convener can advise on this decision. Projects must be completed within a single semester, or within two consecutive semesters. In rare circumstances where students are compelled to take a semester off study for external or personal reasons, an exemption to this rule may be granted, and a student may be given permission to complete the project over two non-consecutive semesters.	This summary provides general information for a student enrolling in this course for the first time following 6+12 or 12 + 12 pattern of enrolment. It is expected that a student will complete a research project of 18 or 24 units. The date ranges provided are a general indication only for a student commencing their research project in semester 2 and submitting their research project in semester 1 of the following year. Assessment due dates and milestones are to be negotiated with the supervisor and/or course convener within the first 2 weeks of the first enrolment.

Assessment Summary

Assessment task	Value	Due Date	Learning Outcomes
Research report	84 %	01/06/2023	1,2,3,4,5,6
Article	10 %	01/06/2023	6
Reflective posts	6 %	*	6
Research methods assignment	0 %	*	3,4,5

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

• Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
• Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure
• Special Assessment Consideration Guideline and General Information 
• Student Surveys and Evaluations
• Deferred Examinations
• Student Complaint Resolution Policy and Procedure
• Code of practice for teaching and learning

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

There is no assessable participation requirement of this course but students are strongly encouraged to meet regularly with their supervisor to discuss progress.

Assessment Task 1

Research report

5000-8000 word report, in style of journal paper, written as if for Public Understanding of Science or other relevant journal.

Due: Thursday 11.59pm, exam week 1

Returned: within 3 weeks from submission

 

Details of task:

Producing this assignment is the major task of the course. The final product you are aiming for is a research report in the style of a science communication journal paper, or manuscript ready for submission to a journal. The idea is to design and complete an original research project and write it up for publication. In an ideal world your research and your report will be so great that you can submit the assignment to a journal directly with no changes, so that's what you should aim for. The report should take the form of either a research paper or a review paper, depending on your project.

 

You should conform to the submission requirements of the journal Public Understanding of Science or other relevant journal (discuss with your supervisor) when completing your report, including its referencing style guide, word count and general expectations of the journal. You should discuss the choice of journal with your supervisor and the course convener before nominating one. If your chosen journal is something other than Public Understanding of Science, please ensure you note this on your assessment task to allow examiners to check you have complied to the appropriate submission requirements.

 

Marking criteria:

To be eligible for a pass in this assignment:

• The assignment must be 5000-8000 words total, including all headings and titles, the abstract, the reference list and any tables and figures, as per the requirements of Public Understanding of Science or other relevant journal. If you fail to meet this requirement you will fail the assignment irrespective of its quality otherwise.
• You must comply with all ethical requirements of the project.

What your assignment should demonstrate:

• A report that conforms to the journal's specified submission requirements, style guide, and general tone and scope, as well as general expectations of a research paper or review paper published in a peer-reviewed journal.
• A well planned project that has been expertly designed to answer an important question in science communication.
• A robust dataset that has been analysed critically, intelligently and with care.
• A well-structured report that flows beautifully, forming a convincing argument around your research question.
• A comprehensive, intelligently synthesised and relevant literature review.
• Well explained, well referenced methods.
• Clear and objective reporting of results via appropriate techniques, including professional use of statistics, tables and figures where relevant.
• Nuanced, intelligent and critical interpretation of results and discussion of their implications for the discipline and real life practice, as appropriate, including a discussion of the project's limitations and any recommendations for further research or implementation.
• Professional standard referencing.

NOTE: You are welcome to create a video abstract for your report if your chosen journal allows video abstracts!

Assessment Task 2

Article

800 ±10% word article about your research in style of academic blog post, written as if for The Conversation

Due: Thursday 11.59pm, exam week 1

Returned: within 3 weeks from submission

 

Details of task:

In this assignment you will write about your own research for a more general readership. The assignment involves writing a 800 word (±10%) article in the style expected of academics writing about their research for The Conversation. The idea is to ?sell' your research project to the world by showing how it relates to trending current events and/or how it can be applied usefully in practice. To achieve this aim you need to write about your work with appropriate language, style and structure.

 

Marking criteria:

To be eligible for a pass in this assignment:

• The assignment must be 800 words ±10% excluding title and any captions.

What your assignment should demonstrate:

• An article that beautifully captures a conversational style, is engaging to read, flows well and entertains.
• A piece structured appropriately for the target venue.
• Appropriate use of any multi-media elements and style elements relevant to the online medium.
• Medium-appropriate acknowledgement of other people's work and thoughts.
• A persuasive argument that taps into trending current events and/or practical applications of interest to the general readership of The Conversation.

Assessment Task 3

Reflective posts

3 blog posts worth 2% each, to be submitted on set dates across the duration of the project

Due: Wednesday 11.59pm in semester weeks 4, 8 and 11

Returned: within a week of submission

 

Details of task:

This assignment is designed to help you think reflectively and personally about the research process and your own journey with your project.

Your posts will be submitted on a private blog that only current students in this course and SCOM3003 have access to. There you will find an ‘Instructions’ page (see tab in top right corner) and you should follow the instructions.

In the first and last posts you will have a specific set of questions you must answer in your reflection. For the second post you have a list of questions to choose from.

Marking criteria:

To be eligible for a pass on each post:

• You must submit the post by the due date to a reasonable standard and length. No late posts will be accepted. If you complete it on time and to this standard each blog post will be worth 2% of your final mark.If you do not, or you submit it even 1 minute late, you will get 0.

What your assignment should demonstrate:

• A post in which you spend a reasonably long, detailed paragraph answering each question.
• Reflection on the research process rather than mere description.

Assessment Task 4

Research methods assignment

A hurdle requirement for students enrolled in 24 units of SCOM8000 during their degree. Students only enrolling in 18 units of SCOM8000 do not complete this assignment.

Due: Thursday 11.59pm in week 11 of first semester of enrolment

Returned: within a week of submission

 

Details of task:

This assignment is designed to enhance your skills and knowledge in research methods appropriate to your project.

The specific assignment will be negotiated between you, your supervisor and the course convener.

There are three standard options:

1. For quantitative projects: complete the three online statistics modules offered by the ANU Statistical Consulting Unit.
2. For qualitative projects: research and write a 3000 word essay (±10% - including all references [reference list, in-text references, etc.]) about the research methods you will be using (e.g. survey methods, thematic analysis, etc).
3. For projects that are highly ethically sensitive: research and write a 3000 word (±10% - including all references [reference list, in-text references, etc.]) essay about the ethical landscape of the subject matter you are studying and your responsibilities as a researcher, based on your standpoint with respect to the sensitive issues.

Other options are possible but must be approved by the course convener during negotiations.

 

Marking criteria:

Your work must gain at least a credit standard to demonstrate your competence in the chosen topic. If you achieve this standard you will pass the hurdle. The marking criteria may vary depending on the topic, but in general:

• For the statistics modules the mark you are given within the modules will be used to evaluate this.
• For essay options, your assignment must be heavily based in the methods or ethics literature and it must incorporate recent as well as foundational approaches to the methods.

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.

The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.

The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.

 

The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:

Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

The exception to this is the Assignment 3 Reflective posts. No late submissions will be accepted for this assignment.

Referencing Requirements

The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material.

Returning Assignments

Feedback on all assignments will be returned via email.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

• ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
• ANU Access and inclusion for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
• ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
• ANU Academic Skills and Learning Centre supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
• ANU Counselling Centre promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
• ANUSA supports and represents undergraduate and ANU College students
• PARSA supports and represents postgraduate and research students