• Class Number 4157
  • Term Code 3430
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 units
  • Mode of Delivery In Person
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • Cathy Franzi
  • LECTURER
    • Cathy Franzi
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 19/02/2024
  • Class End Date 24/05/2024
  • Census Date 05/04/2024
  • Last Date to Enrol 26/02/2024
SELT Survey Results

This course explores the application of utilitarian objects for the table and home, and their intimate character. Students will be introduced to the process of commissioning utilitarian objects by developing skills in identifying, negotiating and delivering singular and serial objects for a client. Wheel throwing, hand forming and moulding. will be the principal means of producing the items proposed for the commission.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

  1. demonstrate thorough knowledge of the processes, terminology, forms and materials of ceramics practice;
  2. apply appropriate skills and knowledge to the making of creative works;
  3. develop and evaluate concepts and processes by thinking creatively, critically and reflectively;
  4. work independently and/or collaboratively in a workshop environment in response to Ceramic project demands; and
  5. reflect on social, ethical, cultural, technological and environmental issues of creative practice considering local and international perspectives.

Research-Led Teaching

This course is taught with methods and processes that pertain to practice-led research. Students will engage in hands-on research in the studio, as well as contextual research. The course equips students to creatively integrate practice and concepts through the exploration of materials and techniques and to identify historical and theoretical concepts for their work.

Additional Course Costs

Student contribution amounts under the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (HESA) and tuition fees, support the course described in the Course Outline and include tuition, teaching materials, and student access to the workshop for the stated course hours. Students are requested to refer to the School of Art website for information: http://soa.anu.edu.au/required-resources-and-incidental-fees.

The Ceramics Material Fee of $80 covers WHS-approved materials, such as clay, porcelain, and plaster for course project Assessment Task 2. Glaze, decorating colourants and miscellaneous materials are covered for the whole semester. An Additional Materials Fee is for materials at cost in addition to those supplied as part of the course.

After Hours Access Fee of $60 is for students wishing to access the workshop outside of business hours (M-F 18:00 to 22:00, S-S 08:00 to 16:00)

Examination Material or equipment

For mid-semester and final assessments for this course, students will present all project studio work completed, including tests, developmental works and visual journal. Final studio projects and the visual journal are assessed during exam week. All assessments requirements will be discussed during class, and teaching staff are available for any question related to the assessment process.

Required Resources

Recommended Reading prior to course

'Visual Thinking for Design' Colin Ware (Elsevier Science, San Diego 2010)

Recommended Texts

'Prototype: Design and Craft in the 21st Century' Louise Valentine ed. (Bloomsbury, London 2013)

'How Artifacts Afford: the Power and Politics of Everyday Things' Jenny Davis (MIT Press, 2020)

'Folding Techniques for Designers: from Sheet to Form' Paul Jackson (Laurence King, London 2011)

'Contemporary Tableware' Linda Bloomfield (Bloomsbury, London 2013)

'Ceramic Design Course' Anthony Quinn (Quarto, London 2007)

'Craft Economies' Susan Luckman and Nicola Thomas (Bloomsbury 2018)

'Design Studies: a Reader' Hazel Clark and David Brody ed. (Berg, Oxford 2009)

'Handbook of Lighting Design' Rüdiger Ganslandt and Harald Hofmann (Erco, 1992)

'Future craft: how digital media is transforming product design' Leonardo Bonanni et al. (2008)

'The Design of Everyday Things' Donald Norman (Basic Books, New York 2002)

'Smart Works: design and the handmade' Grace Cochrane (Powerhouse Publishing, Haymarket 2007)

'Handbook of Lighting Design' Rüdiger Ganslandt and Harald Hofmann (Erco, 1992)

'Envisioning Information' Edward Tufte (Graphics, Cheshire c1990)


Whether you are on campus or studying online, there are a variety of online platforms you will use to participate in your study program. These could include videos for lectures and other instruction, two-way video conferencing for interactive learning, email and other messaging tools for communication, interactive web apps for formative and collaborative activities, print and/or photo/scan for handwritten work and drawings, and home-based assessment.

ANU outlines recommended student system requirements to ensure you are able to participate fully in your learning. Other information is also available about the various Learning Platforms you may use.

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

  • written comments
  • verbal comments
  • feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.

Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 Course Introduction, WHS checklistLecture: Commission Frameworks: Lead or Follow?Tutorial, demonstration, studio activity: Assessment Tasks - introduction and discussion Assign readings for ‘The Commission Context'.XP1 exercise discussion. Templates for design and forming.Reading homework: 'Smart Works: design and the handmade' Grace Cochrane (Powerhouse Publishing, Haymarket 2007) Read SOA&D WHS information and induction.Reading: 'Smart Works: design and the handmade' Grace Cochrane (Powerhouse Publishing, Haymarket 2007)
2 Lecture: Design in context: Identity and FunctionalityTutorial: Discussion of readingDemonstration and studio activity: Templates for design and forming, slabs, press mouldingStudio practice and consultationsReading homework: Safe Plaster Working Video, Commission Briefs, Demonstration videos
3 Lecture: Commissioning Case StudiesTutorial: Discussion of prescribed readingsDemonstration, studio activity: Clay form and plaster press mould making, textural surface techniques, commence XP1 PrototypeStudio practice and consultationsReading homework: 'Handbook of Lighting Design' Rüdiger Ganslandt and Harald Hofmann (Erco, 1992) Assessment Task 1 due
4 Lecture: Radiance: Lighting and Ceramic DesignTutorial: Lighting exploration exercise in groups; Discussion of readingDemonstration, studio activity: Design using the potters wheel, commence XP2 Prototype, surface techniques to reveal lightStudio practice and consultations
5 Lecture: Upcycling: Recycled materials and ceramic design objectsTutorial, demonstration, studio activity: Good design/bad design. Design using the potters wheel, commence XP3 PrototypeStudio practice and consultations
6 Lecture: The Commission ProposalTutorial, demonstration, studio activity: Continue completion of 3 prototypes for assessment week 7; surface design completion and schedule for kiln firingsStudio practice and consultations
7 Student Presentations: Assessment Task 3 - The Commission ProposalTutorial, demonstration, studio activity: Set up Assessment Task 2 and Visual Journals for discussion and assessmentStudio practice and consultationsReading Homework Assessment Task 2 dueVisual Journals presented as support materialAssessment Task 3 due
8 Lecture: Ceramic Surface Treatment for Production and the Limited EditionTutorial, demonstration, studio activity: Reading discussion. Surface treatment possibilities. Commence Assessment Task 4Studio practice and consultations
9 Lecture: Design ContextTutorial, demonstration, studio activity: Discussion of readingStudio practice and consultations
10 Lecture: Commissioning & Practice Tutorial, demonstration, studio activity: Consideration of surface finishStudio practice and consultationsReading Homework
11 Lecture: Global trends in Ceramic DesignTutorial, demonstration, studio activity: Reading discussion.Studio practice and consultations
12 Lecture: FulfilmentTutorial, demonstration, studio activity: Kiln firing schedules for completion of studio work.Studio practice and consultations
13 Study week
14 Exam week Assessment Task 4 dueAssessment Task 5 due

Tutorial Registration

ANU utilises MyTimetable to enable students to view the timetable for their enrolled courses, browse, then self-allocate to small teaching activities / tutorials so they can better plan their time. Find out more on the Timetable webpage.

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Due Date Learning Outcomes
The Commission Context 10 % 05/03/2024 1,3,5
XP Prototypes 30 % 16/04/2024 1,2,3,4,5
Commission Proposal 10 % 16/04/2024 1,3,5
Commission Fulfilment - studio project 30 % 04/06/2024 1,2,3,4,5
Visual Journal 20 % 04/06/2024 1,3,5

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

Studio teaching time is 4 hours per week. Students should expect to spend at least an additional six hours per week undertaking independent research and documentation, and studio experimentation and project development in the Ceramics workshop outside of class time.

Students are expected to attend all classes and to contribute to class discussions and critique sessions. This will be considered as part of the Studio Assessment of 80%.

Examination(s)

Mid-semester and final assessment for this course will be conducted by exam, in which the student presents all project work including tests, developmental works and visual journal. The studio work assessments will be in Week 7 and Week 14.

Assessment Task 1

Value: 10 %
Due Date: 05/03/2024
Learning Outcomes: 1,3,5

The Commission Context

A 500 word critical summary of an allocated reading on relevant theoretical studies. Value: 10%

Rubric

COURSE MARKING CRITERIAHDDCPF

Demonstrate thorough knowledge of the processes, terminology, forms and materials of ceramics practice. LO1

Critically discusses reading with an exceptional understanding of the field of Ceramics.

Critically discusses reading with a superior understanding of the field of Ceramics.

Critically discusses reading with a good understanding of the field of Ceramics.

Critically discusses reading with a satisfactory understanding of the field of Ceramics.

Discusses reading with an unsatisfactory understanding of the field of Ceramics.

Develop and evaluate concepts and processes by thinking creatively, critically and reflectively.

LO3

Develops and evaluates concepts and processes to identify the key points from the reading to an exceptional level.

Develops and evaluates concepts and processes to identify key points from the reading to a superior level.

Develops and evaluates concepts and processes to identify key points from the reading to a good level.

Develops and evaluates concepts and processes to identify key points from the reading to a satisfactory level.

Unable to evaluate concepts from the reading.

Reflect on social, ethical, cultural, technological and environmental issues of creative practice considering local and international perspectives.

LO5

Critically discusses with exceptional understanding the relationship between the reading topic and the context of commissioning.

Critically discusses with superior understanding the relationship between the reading topic and the context of commissioning.

Critically discusses with good understanding the relationship between the reading topic and the context of commissioning.

Critically discusses with satisfactory understanding the relationship between the reading topic and the context of commissioning.

Displays an unsatisfactory understanding of the relationship between the reading topic and the context of commissioning.

Assessment Task 2

Value: 30 %
Due Date: 16/04/2024
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5

XP Prototypes

Complete three exploratory exercise prototypes, demonstrating the creative use of a variety of ceramic materials and processes in response to topics relevant to the fields of commission work. Students will explore a range of prototyping approaches, developing the skills and knowledge necessary to execute different types of ceramic design. Methods may include folding, slab building, modelling, carving, press moulding, wheel forming, laser cutting, 3d modelling and printing, texturing, and glazing and decorating methods relevant to ceramic forming and surface applications. Value: 30%

Rubric

COURSE MARKING CRITERIAHDDCPF

Demonstrate thorough knowledge of the processes, terminology, forms and materials of ceramics practice. LO1

Consistently develops and applies knowledge of all ceramic processes, terminology, forms and materials to an exceptionally high level, showing clarity and refinement of Prototype submissions.

Consistently develops and applies knowledge of ceramic processes, terminology, forms and materials to a superior level, showing clarity and refinement of Prototype submissions.

Develops and applies knowledge of a broad range of ceramic processes, terminology, forms and materials, with Prototype works of good quality.

A satisfactory level of work demonstrated, indicating adequate knowledge of process, terminology, form and materials of ceramics practice.

The processes, terminology, forms and materials of ceramics practice have not been demonstrated.

Apply appropriate skills and knowledge to the making of creative works.

LO2

Exceptional quality of execution and creativity demonstrated through iterative exploration across techniques of slab building, mould and press forming, and/or wheel forming, and finishing and decorating.

Superior quality of execution and creativity demonstrated across exploration of techniques of slab building, mould and press forming, and/or wheel forming, and finishing and decorating.

Good quality of execution and creativity demonstrated across techniques of slab building, mould and press forming, and/or wheel forming, and finishing and decorating.

Satisfactory skills and creativity evident, with adequate knowledge demonstrated in the making of Prototype works.

Insufficient skills and knowledge evidenced in Prototype works.

Develop and evaluate concepts and processes by thinking creatively, critically and reflectively.

LO3

Demonstration of creative development and resolution of design ideas and research to an outstanding level.

Demonstration of creative development and resolution of design ideas and research to a superior level.

Demonstration of creative development and resolution of design ideas and research to a level of good quality.

Demonstration of creative development and resolution of design ideas and research to a satisfactory level.

Insufficient demonstration of creative development and resolution of design ideas and research.

Work independently and/or collaboratively in a workshop environment in response to Ceramic project demands. LO4

An outstanding level of self-directed investigation, and extensive management of materials, process and time demonstrated.

A thorough level of self-directed investigation and excellent management of materials, process and time demonstrated.

A good level of self-directed investigation and good management of materials, process and time demonstrated.

A satisfactory level of self-directed investigation and reasonable management of materials, process and time demonstrated.

Insufficient level of self-directed investigation and inadequate management of materials, process and time.

Reflect on social, ethical, cultural, technological and environmental issues of creative practice considering local and international perspectives.

LO5

Outstanding depth and breadth of research evident in the ideas, current issues and purpose explored in developing the Prototypes.

Superior depth and breadth of research evident in the ideas, current issues and purpose explored in developing the Prototypes.

Depth and breadth of research evident to a good level in the ideas, current issues and purpose explored in developing the Prototypes.

A satisfactory level of research demonstrated in the ideas, current issues and purpose explored in developing the Prototypes.

No demonstration of research undertaken to inform the development of the Prototypes.

Assessment Task 3

Value: 10 %
Due Date: 16/04/2024
Learning Outcomes: 1,3,5

Commission Proposal

Present a written commission proposal on the supplied template, comprising a concept statement, 500-word contextual research summary, visualisations of proposed works, preliminary design drawings, commissioning costing outline, and planning summary. A 5-minute class presentation is informal and will not be assessed. Value: 10%

Rubric

COURSE MARKING CRITERiAHDDCPF

Demonstrate thorough knowledge of the processes, terminology, forms and materials of ceramics practice. LO1

Presents an exceptional and imaginative plan of how ceramic materials will be employed in practical work. Design drawings, planning summary and costings demonstrate exceptional understanding of ceramic practice.

Presents a superior and imaginative plan of how ceramic materials will be employed in practical work. Design drawings, planning summary and costings demonstrate superior understanding of ceramic practice.

Presents a considered and imaginative plan of how ceramic materials will be employed in practical work. Design drawings, planning summary and costings demonstrate a very good understanding of ceramic practice.

Presents a plan of how ceramic materials will be employed in practical work. Design drawings, planning summary and costings demonstrate a satisfactory understanding of ceramic practice.

Presents an unsatisfactory plan of how ceramic materials will be employed in practical work. Design drawings, planning summary and costings do not demonstrate a satisfactory understanding of ceramic practice.

Develop and evaluate concepts and processes by thinking creatively, critically and reflectively.

LO3

Demonstrates exceptional concept design and evidence of contextual research. Critically discusses in depth how ceramic form, surface, materials and display will be used to achieve the Commission. Outstanding relationships are established between conceptual vision and alignment of the brief.

Demonstrates superior concept design and evidence of contextual research. Critically discusses in depth how ceramic form, surface, materials and display will be used to achieve the Commission. Superior relationships are established between conceptual vision and alignment of the brief.

Demonstrates very good concept design and evidence of contextual research. Discusses in depth how ceramic form, surface, materials and display will be used to achieve the Commission. Very good relationships are established between conceptual vision and alignment of the brief.

Demonstrates concept design and evidence of contextual research. Discusses how ceramic form, surface, materials and display will be used to achieve the Commission. Satisfactory relationships are established between conceptual vision and alignment of the brief.

Unsatisfactory concept design and evidence of contextual research. Ceramic form, surface, materials and display are unsatisfactorily discussed to be able to achieve the Commission. Insufficient relationships are established between conceptual vision and alignment of the brief.

Reflect on social, ethical, cultural, technological and environmental issues of creative practice considering local and international perspectives.

LO5

Outstanding depth and breadth of research evident in the ideas, current issues and purpose explored in developing the Commission Proposal.

Superior depth and breadth of research evident in the ideas, current issues and purpose explored in developing the Commission Proposal.

Very good depth and breadth of research evident in the ideas, current issues and purpose explored in developing the Commission Proposal.

A satisfactory level of research demonstrated in the ideas, current issues and purpose explored in developing the Commission Proposal.

No demonstration of research undertaken to inform the development of the Commission Proposal.

Assessment Task 4

Value: 30 %
Due Date: 04/06/2024
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5

Commission Fulfilment - studio project

To research, refine and complete ceramic prototypes for a chosen commission project. The Commission Presentation document will present the final outcome including concept description, specifications, diagrams, images, research and critical reflection. Value: 30%

Rubric

COURSE MARKING CRITERIAHDDCPF

Demonstrate thorough knowledge of the processes, terminology, forms and materials of ceramics practice. LO1

Consistently develops and applies knowledge of all ceramic processes, terminology, forms and materials to an exceptionally high level, showing clarity and refinement of the Commission project.

Consistently develops and applies knowledge of all ceramic processes, terminology, forms and materials to a superior level, showing clarity and refinement of the Commission project.

Consistently develops and applies knowledge of ceramic processes, terminology, forms and materials to a very good level, showing clarity and refinement of the Commission project.

Develops and applies knowledge of ceramic processes, terminology, forms and materials to a satisfactory level, showing adequate resolution of the Commission project.

The processes, terminology, forms and materials of ceramics practice have not been adequately demonstrated.

Apply appropriate skills and knowledge to the making of creative works.

LO2

Exceptional quality of execution and creativity demonstrated through iterative exploration across chosen techniques, including finishing and decorating.

Superior quality of execution and creativity demonstrated through iterative exploration across chosen techniques, including finishing and decorating.

Good quality of execution and creativity demonstrated through iterative exploration across chosen techniques, including finishing and decorating.

Satisfactory level of execution and creativity demonstrated through exploration across chosen techniques, including finishing and decorating.

Unsatisfactory level of execution and creativity across chosen techniques, including finishing and decorating.

Develop and evaluate concepts and processes by thinking creatively, critically and reflectively.

LO3

Demonstrates exceptional concept design and evidence of contextual research. Outstanding relationships are established between conceptual vision and alignment of the brief.

Demonstrates superior concept design and evidence of contextual research. Superior relationships are established between conceptual vision and alignment of the brief.

Demonstrates work of good quality in concept design and evidence of contextual research. Good relationships are established between conceptual vision and alignment of the brief.

Demonstrates satisfactory concept design and contextual research. Good relationships are established between conceptual vision and alignment of the brief.

Unsatisfactory concept design and evidence of contextual research. The relationship between conceptual vision and alignment of the brief is insufficient.

Work independently and/or collaboratively in a workshop environment in response to Ceramic project demands. LO4

An outstanding level of self-directed investigation, and extensive management of materials, process and time demonstrated.

A thorough level of self-directed investigation and excellent management of materials, process and time demonstrated.

A good level of self-directed investigation and good management of materials, process and time demonstrated.

A satisfactory level of self-directed investigation and reasonable management of materials, process and time demonstrated.

Insufficient level of self-directed investigation and inadequate management of materials, processes and time.

Reflect on social, ethical, cultural, technological and environmental issues of creative practice considering local and international perspectives.

LO5

Outstanding depth and breadth of research evident in the ideas, current issues and purpose explored in developing and resolving the Commission project.

Exceptional depth and breadth of research evident in the ideas, current issues and purpose explored in developing and executing the Commission project.

Good quality of depth and breadth of research evident in the ideas, current issues and purpose explored in developing and executing the Commission project.

Satisfactory depth and breadth of research evident in the ideas, current issues and purpose explored in the Commission project.

Unsatisfactory level of research in the ideas, current issues and purpose explored in the Commission project.

Assessment Task 5

Value: 20 %
Due Date: 04/06/2024
Learning Outcomes: 1,3,5

Visual Journal

The Visual Journal documents studio and ideas development, including ongoing visual and practical research and explorations, ideas, information, technical documentation and experimentation, and sketches. It will include reflections and information about exhibitions visited, lectures, class readings, art/design works, books, journals, etc. The visual journal should reflect the development of your ideas over the semester, show experimentation, and critical reflection on your own work and that of other artists. A 500 word critical reflection on your Commission Project will be required by Week 14.

Value: 20% Submitted at Week 7 review and final assessment in Week 14

Rubric

COURSE MARKING CRITERIAHDDCPF

Demonstrate thorough knowledge of the processes, terminology, forms and materials of ceramics practice. LO1

Comprehensively and insightfully documents development and knowledge of ceramic skills, including technical information, processes, terminology and use of ceramic materials and equipment. Exceptional evidence of progression through consistent sketching, documentation and self-evaluation. 

Comprehensively documents development and knowledge of ceramic skills, including technical information, processes, terminology and use of ceramic materials and equipment. Superior evidence of progression through consistent sketching, documentation and self-evaluation. 

Documents development of ceramic skills and knowledge, including technical information, processes, terminology and use of ceramic equipment. Good evidence of progression through consistent sketching, documentation, and self-evaluation. 

Some documentation of development of ceramic skills and knowledge, including technical information, processes, terminology and use of ceramic equipment. Adequate evidence of progression through sketching, documentation, and self-evaluation. 

Insufficient documentation of ceramic skills and knowledge. Limited or no evidence of progression through sketching, documentation, and self-evaluation. 

 

Develop and evaluate concepts and processes by thinking creatively, critically and reflectively.

LO3

The relationship between concept and process is imaginatively explored through research, writing, and sketching. Exceptionally strong evidence of iterative ideation, and creative and critical thinking through sketching, documentation, and consistent critical reflection. 

The relationship between concept and process is explored through research, writing, and sketching. Strong evidence of iterative ideation, and creative and critical thinking through sketching, documentation, and consistent critical reflection. 

The relationship between concept and process is explored to a good level through research, writing, and sketching. Good evidence of creative and critical thinking through documentation and critical reflection. 

The relationship between concept and process is explored in an adequate way through research, writing, and sketching. Some evidence of creative and critical thinking through documentation and reflection. 

 

Knowledge of concepts and process is not evidenced in documentation. Insufficient sketching, research, and reflection. 

Reflect on social, ethical, cultural, technological and environmental issues of creative practice considering local and international perspectives.

LO5

Makes highly relevant reference to other artists, and local and international perspectives. Exceptional evidence of contextual research and reflection on current issues, consistently and astutely linked to student’s own studio practice. 

Makes relevant reference to other artists, and local and international perspectives. Strong evidence of contextual research and reflection on current issues, consistently and astutely linked to student’s own studio practice. 

Makes reference to other artists, and local and international perspectives. Good evidence of contextual research and reflection on current issues, with links to student’s own studio practice. 

Some reference to other artists, and local and international perspectives. Adequate evidence of contextual research and reflection on current issues, with links to student’s own studio practice. 

Limited evidence of research on either other artists or contextual issues and perspectives.

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.


The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.


The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.

 

The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, visual journals, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:

  • Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
  • Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material.

Returning Assignments

All work and folio submissions presented in the studio for examination must be removed on the same day your assessment is complete (or date agreed by Lecturer). The workshop does not provide storage of artworks. 

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

Cathy Franzi
U4046847@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/franzi-c

Cathy Franzi

Monday 11:00 17:00
Monday 11:00 17:00
Thursday 11:00 17:00
Thursday 11:00 17:00
Cathy Franzi
0435010109
Cathy.Franzi@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Cathy Franzi

Monday 11:00 17:00
Monday 11:00 17:00
Thursday 11:00 17:00
Thursday 11:00 17:00

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions