• Class Number 3754
  • Term Code 3430
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 units
  • Mode of Delivery In Person
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • Conal Monaghan
  • LECTURER
    • Conal Monaghan
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 19/02/2024
  • Class End Date 24/05/2024
  • Census Date 05/04/2024
  • Last Date to Enrol 26/02/2024
SELT Survey Results

This course will provide you with knowledge of the theory and principles of major forms of psychological assessment (including standardised psychometric tests) and relevant cultural, developmental and ethical considerations.
There will be practical components in which you will learn and practice interpersonal communication and interview skills and plan, conduct, interpret and report basic psychological assessments, including an introduction to risk assessment.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

  1. Apply their understanding of psychometric assessment principles and tests in settings relevant to professional practice.
  2. Explain cultural, social, developmental and ethical considerations in basic psychological assessments.
  3. Plan, implement and report basic psychological assessments.
  4. Demonstrate appropriate communication skills suitable for a professional environment.

Research-Led Teaching

All lectures will make use of evidence drawn from relevant disciplinary research to benefit student learning and outcomes. Some may share their own research findings with students. This will provide students with special insights into the specific topics discussed. Having access to lecturers who are also key leaders in the field may mean that the listed lecture sequence, that is, the lecture topics may change to another week in order to accommodate access to these experts.


This course will integrate current ethics and regulation in Australian Psychological Assessment, and will focus on integrating current assessment research with data from specific clients.


The course acts as a foundation course for advanced psychological assessment in the 2nd year.  

Field Trips

NA

Additional Course Costs

NA

Examination Material or equipment

You will require a method of recording your video assessment (Task 1). This can be completed using your laptop or a dedicated video recording device. Please contact the course convenier ASAP if you require access to video recording devices.

Required Resources

Required readings and other resources will be uploaded via Wattle throughout the course. These will be provided for each session (lectures and tutorials).

Students are strongly advised to purchase the following resources as part of their ongoing journey to being professional psychologists.

  1. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th eds, 2019)
  2. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (5th eds). American Psychiatric Pub.
  3. Zuckerman, E. L. (2019). Clinician's thesaurus: The guide to conducting interviews and writing psychological reports. (8th eds). Guilford Publications.

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

  • Written comments on assignments:
  • Verbal comments.
  • Feedback to the whole class.
  • To groups; and
  • To individuals.

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.

Other Information

Referencing Requirements

Psychology uses the referencing style endorsed by the American Psychological Association:

American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Washington, DC: Author


Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 Introduction and Overview of Psychological Assessment
2 Behavioural Assessment Students will be asked to complete the behavioural record provided during the workshop.
3 Formulation and Conceptualisation Role Play Assessment will be provided during this week;
WORKSHOP 1: Counselling Skills. The workshop will focus on practicing core counselling skills: reflective listening, reflection, minimal encouragers, and validation.
4 The Clinical Interview Skills Workshop 2: Identifying Risk. The workshop will focus on practicing asking about risk and safety through role-play and demonstration.
5 Psychometric Theory 1: Reliability and Validity
6 Psychometric Theory 2: Clinical utility, Interpretations, and Considerations
7 Self-report Assessment Role Play Assessment due before class this week
8 Structured and Semi-Structured Assessment

9 Assessment of Personality
10 Assessment Report Writing
11 Feedback and Implementing Reflective-Practice 
12 Applied Clinical Practice and Reflection Session
13 No Lecture: Exam Week 1
14 No Lecture: Exam Week 2 Assessment Report Due Friday (second Week of Examination period).
15 No Lecture: Exam Week 3

Tutorial Registration

Not applicable

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Learning Outcomes
Role Play Assessment – Administration of Clinical Interview and the DASS-21. 50 % 2,3,4
Assessment Report 50 % 1, 2, 3

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

This course is delivered entirely on campus/in person. Students will be expected to attend all workshops in line with the standards of a professional training program. Workshops are not recorded and absences without appropriate documentation will result in missing course content. Please contact the course convenor in advance if unable to attend specific workshops.


Examination(s)

There are no examinations associated with this course. Marking Rubric for the assignment and video will be made available with the assessment sheets.

Assessment Task 1

Value: 50 %
Learning Outcomes: 2,3,4

Role Play Assessment – Administration of Clinical Interview and the DASS-21.

Topic: In pairs, students will record a clinical assessment interview with another classmate to demonstrate the skills learned during the workshops, and then reflect on their own clinical assessment. This task will provide students with the opportunity and practice the clinical interview skills developed in lectures and skills workshops, and develop strong self-reflection practices.

Students are advised to practice keeping detailed notes during their video, as this video will form part of the next assessment for the course: Assessment Report (Task 2). 

Value: 50%

Submitted pieces:

·      A video of the student's clinical assessment (30minutes). 

·      A written reflection on the student's assessment (750 - 1000 words). 


Feedback for this assignment can also be provided in a 1:1 face-to-face format. Students can request feedback in person to discuss their interview and skill development with the course convener or an MPP staff member.


More detailed information on assessment requirements and marking will be made available on the course site and during the course.

Assessment Task 2

Value: 50 %
Learning Outcomes: 1, 2, 3

Assessment Report

Topic:

Writing strong assessments is a key skill of professional psychologists. This assessment aims to help students develop clinical assessment report skills and allow students to integrate their knowledge on referral questions and assessment aims, psychological measures, clinical interview, formulation, interpretation, and recommendations.


This report will be based on their video assessment (Assessment Task 1).

Submitted pieces:

  • An assessment report based on the clinical interview in the assessment role play and the results of the DASS-21. Approximately 2000 words in length exluding figures, tables, and citations. Assessment should be completed using the template provided (on course Wattle site).

Value: 50%


Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.


The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.


The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.

 

The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.


Given the size of the video assignment, students should submit assignments via a cloud-platform link or handed to the course convenor during class time.

Late Submission

Video assessment (Assessment Task 1) and the Assessment report (Assessment Task 2)

  • Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material.

Returning Assignments

Assignments will be returned electronically through the course wattle site via Turnitin in accordance with the outlined submission dates. Assignments will be returned approximately two weeks after submission. The video assessment will be returned approximately 3 weeks after submission due to the time required to mark the videos and provide detailed feedback.


Students may be asked to share a 5-minute section of their video to watch with the convenor to develop self-reflective practice. This additional feedback is optional and can be used to guide learning going forward.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Resubmission of Assignments

Grading in the Master of Professional Psychology program reflects achievement of competencies as appropriate to developmental level. As such, students will be provided with grades indicating that competency has been met Course Requirement Satisfied (CRS) or not met (Fail).


Failure to submit an assignment of a high standard which meets requirements for a passing grade (50%) will result in a student receiving feedback on the area/s requiring remediation and one opportunity for resubmission of the assignment to address these issues. This opportunity is provided only in circumstances where a genuine attempt to address the assignment requirements was determined to be made in the first submission. If the resubmission satisfactorily addresses the issues identified, a grade of CRS will be awarded for the task. The need to re-submit the same assignment twice due to inadequate performance will result in overall failure of the assessment piece, and thus the course, which will need to be repeated in a future offering.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

Conal Monaghan
conal.monaghan@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Personality, Machiavellianism, Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, Clinician Well-being, Open and Reproducible Science, Psychometrics, Clinical Psychological Assessment

Conal Monaghan

By Appointment
By Appointment
Conal Monaghan
612 52835
Conal.monaghan@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Conal Monaghan

By Appointment
By Appointment

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions