The fourth of the sequential music performance courses supports students in deepening their knowledge and skills in both solo and ensemble settings while also building practical experience in live performance. This course focuses on musical performance in a live concert context, providing students with opportunities to plan and perform as a soloist and ensemble leader. Students will participate in one-to-one sessions with vocal/instrumental teachers, ensemble rehearsals, seminars, live performance, and other practical and academic contexts.
Learning Outcomes
Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:
- demonstrate an informed and progressively developing understanding of terminology, characteristics of style, and historical concepts as they relate to musical works;
- demonstrate an informed and progressively developing level of technical proficiency, and an evidential understanding of the emotional content in musical works;
- work independently and collaboratively to develop confidence in understanding the craft of musical performance and its presentation to an audience; and
- critically analyse material and aesthetical elements of music, demonstrating an ability to provide feedback and pose research questions in both written and verbal formats.
Research-Led Teaching
Lecturers and instructors in this course are committed to research-led, evidence-based instruction. A culture of enquiry, collaboration, critical thinking, creativity, performance excellence, and academic rigour is fostered by linking scholarly research in music pedagogy with professional expertise as creative practitioners. Students in this course are encouraged and supported to develop an autoethnographic research-led praxis.
Field Trips
Students are encouraged to attend live and online concerts, as well as other artistic and performative events, workshops, masterclasses, and festivals throughout the semester. Additionally, they are advised to visit the library for research materials and participate in training sessions.
Examination Material or equipment
Students may be required to provide copies of scores, repertoire lists, and personal devices for playback of backing tracks/transcriptions. Full details will be provided on Canvas, in seminars/tutorials, and directly from one-to-one tutors.
Required Resources
Details will be provided on Canvas, in seminars/tutorials, and directly from one-to-one tutors.
Recommended Resources
Whether you are on campus or studying online, there are a variety of online platforms you will use to participate in your study program. These could include videos for lectures and other instruction, two-way video conferencing for interactive learning, email and other messaging tools for communication, interactive web apps for formative and collaborative activities, print and/or photo/scan for handwritten work and drawings, and home-based assessment.
ANU outlines recommended student system requirements to ensure you are able to participate fully in your learning. Other information is also available about the various Learning Platforms you may use.
Staff Feedback
Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:
- written comments
- verbal comments
- feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc
Student Feedback
ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.
Class Schedule
Week/Session | Summary of Activities | Assessment |
---|---|---|
1 | One-to-one lessons, meet your ensemble, instrumental/vocal seminar, intro to the course/assessment overview (tutorial) | |
2 | 1-to-1 lessons, ensemble rehearsal, instrumental/vocal seminar, tutorial | |
3 | 1-to-1 lessons, ensemble rehearsal, instrumental/vocal seminar, tutorial | |
4 | 1-to-1 lessons, ensemble rehearsal, instrumental/vocal seminar, tutorial | |
5 | 1-to-1 lessons, ensemble rehearsal, instrumental/vocal seminar, Concert Practice | |
6 | 1-to-1 lessons, ensemble rehearsal, instrumental/vocal seminar, Concert Practice | Assessment 1: Repertoire Research Overview |
7 | 1-to-1 lessons, ensemble rehearsal, instrumental/vocal seminar, Concert Practice | |
8 | 1-to-1 lessons, ensemble rehearsal, instrumental/vocal seminar, Concert Practice | |
9 | 1-to-1 lessons, ensemble rehearsal, instrumental/vocal seminar, Concert Practice | |
10 | 1-to-1 lessons, ensemble rehearsal, instrumental/vocal seminar, Concert Practice | |
11 | 1-to-1 lessons, ensemble rehearsal, instrumental/vocal seminar, Concert Practice | |
12 | 1-to-1 lessons, ensemble performance, instrumental/vocal seminar, Concert Practice | Assessment 2: Ensemble performance |
13 | Exam period | Assessment 3: Recital |
Tutorial Registration
ANU utilises MyTimetable to enable students to view the timetable for their enrolled courses, browse, then self-allocate to small teaching activities/tutorials so they can better plan their time. Find out more on the Timetable webpage.
Assessment Summary
Assessment task | Value | Due Date | Learning Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|
Repertoire Research Overview - 20% | 20 % | 25/08/2025 | 1,2 |
Ensemble Performance and Participation Assessment - 20% | 20 % | * | 1,2,3,4 |
Performance Folio (Concert Practice & Recital) - 60% | 60 % | * | 1,2,3,4 |
* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details
Policies
ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:
- Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure
- Extenuating Circumstances Application
- Student Surveys and Evaluations
- Deferred Examinations
- Student Complaint Resolution Policy and Procedure
- Code of practice for teaching and learning
Assessment Requirements
The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.
Moderation of Assessment
Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.
Participation
Participation in weekly rehearsals, seminars, and one-to-one lessons is necessary for the successful fulfilment of learning outcomes and completion of this course.
Assessment Task 1
Learning Outcomes: 1,2
Repertoire Research Overview - 20%
This assessment task supports your developing ability to understand stylistic, structural, and contextual aspects of your performance repertoire. You will submit a short, focused research snapshot on two of the works you are preparing for performance this semester.
The aim is to demonstrate informed engagement with the historical, stylistic, and expressive dimensions of your chosen piece. This research will inform your interpretive decisions and guide your preparation for performance.
What to Include:
- Composer name, dates, and a brief background (2–3 sentences)
- Title and year of composition
- Historical/stylistic period and defining characteristics
- Summary of key structural and/or harmonic features
- Description of expressive or emotional qualities
- A minimum of four references used (e.g., scholarly source, program note, artist commentary)
Submission: written submission via Canvas (1200 - 1500 words), 12-point font, 1.5 spacing, as well as a list of sources.
Due: 25/68/2025 Week 6
Weighting: 20%
Rubric
Criteria | HD | D | C | P | N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stylistic and Historical Understanding | Sophisticated understanding with accurate and contextually appropriate terminology | Clear and sound understanding with relevant stylistic and historical detail | Adequate awareness with some stylistic insight; minor inaccuracies | Basic awareness with limited stylistic relevance | Minimal or incorrect understanding |
Structural and Expressive Insight | Insightful description of form, structure, and emotional content with interpretive nuance | Clear technical and expressive commentary with thoughtful reflection | General identification of structure and expression | Limited description of structure or expression | Lacks clarity or relevance |
Research and Sources | Consistent and effective use of high-quality, relevant sources to support insight | Relevant sources used with some interpretation and integration | Minimal or surface-level use of sources | One source used with little analytical integration | No sources used or unclear/unattributed references |
Assessment Task 2
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4
Ensemble Performance and Participation Assessment - 20%
This assessment recognises the essential role of active participation in the development of ensemble musicianship. Students will participate in weekly rehearsals with an assigned ensemble and tutor to build advanced ensemble techniques, develop individual and collective rehearsal habits, and explore a variety of musical, stylistic, and culturally informed performance practices.
Students will be guided in developing both verbal and non-verbal communication strategies, the ability to give and receive constructive feedback, and ensemble-specific technical and musical skills. Emphasis is placed on historically and stylistically appropriate performance practices, teamwork, and professional rehearsal conduct.
Assessment is based on two key components:
Ensemble Rehearsal Participation
Students will be assessed by their ensemble director on the following criteria:
- Musical Development: Evidence of ongoing technical improvement, ensemble listening skills, and appropriate stylistic expression (e.g. dynamics, articulation, intonation, or improvisation depending on the ensemble).
- Responsiveness and Collaboration: Ability to respond constructively to direction from the ensemble director and peers, and to contribute meaningfully to rehearsal goals.
- Professionalism: Preparation of parts, punctuality, and commitment to the shared musical outcome.
Final Concert Participation - Pass/Fail
Students must participate in the final public performance of their ensemble.
- Failure to attend the final performance without approved exceptional circumstances will result in a fail for this portion of the assessment and may compromise progression in the course.
- Participation in the concert demonstrates the culmination of rehearsal learning and contributes to the overall ensemble experience for all members.
Submission: Participation records, ensemble director evaluation, and participation in the final concert
Due Date: Ongoing across the semester; final concert (Week 12) participation is expected
Rubric
Criteria | HD | D | C | P | N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Technical Proficiency and Rehearsal Habits | Demonstrates consistent advanced technical control and professional rehearsal discipline | Demonstrates strong technique and reliable rehearsal engagement | Demonstrates developing technical control and rehearsal focus | Basic technical competence with variable rehearsal habits | Limited technical development and inconsistent rehearsal participation |
Stylistically/Culturally Appropriate Performance Practice | Performs with deep stylistic awareness and strong cultural understanding | Performs with clear stylistic accuracy and relevant cultural awareness | Performs with general stylistic understanding and intent | Basic stylistic application; cultural elements underdeveloped | Performance lacks stylistic or cultural appropriateness |
Communication and Ensemble Skills | Consistently demonstrates advanced communication, responsiveness, and leadership in ensemble contexts | Communicates effectively and contributes to ensemble cohesion | Demonstrates basic ensemble awareness and interaction | Participation evident but communication is inconsistent | Poor ensemble awareness or minimal contribution |
Criterion | Pass | Fail | |||
Participation in Final Performance | Student actively participated in the final ensemble performance | Student did not participate in the final performance without approved exemption |
Assessment Task 3
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4
Performance Folio (Concert Practice & Recital) - 60%
This folio comprises two key performance assessments designed to track and showcase your developing and culminating performance capabilities.
- Concert Practice Performance (Weeks 5 - 12): A 10-minute, work-in-progress performance that presents either selected repertoire from your planned final recital or repertoire that reflects your current musical and technical development. This is a formative opportunity to receive feedback on performance readiness and to demonstrate emerging interpretive and stylistic insight.
- Recital (End of Semester): A formal 30 - 35 minute performance that reflects intermediate level technical command, expressive maturity development, stylistic awareness, and performance professionalism. The recital should demonstrate your capacity to curate and deliver a compelling musical experience. Program notes of approximately 600 words must accompany the performance, offering stylistic, historical, and interpretive context for your audience.
Weighting:
- Concert Practice Performance: 20%
- Final Recital Performance: 40%
Submission: In-person performances during scheduled times.
Recital Program Notes: Program notes (~600 words) submitted to Canvas by 30th October 2025
Rubric
Concert Practice Criteria | HD | D | C | P | N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Technical Development | Secure technique and expressive development appropriate to level | Generally consistent technique | Some technical inconsistencies | Basic proficiency with limitations | Underprepared or insufficient technique |
Stylistic, Interpretive, and Improvisational Awareness | Clear stylistic direction and interpretive/improvisation development (as appropriate) | Good stylistic consistency | Some stylistic accuracy and interpretation | Limited style or interpretation | No clear stylistic or expressive focus |
Repertoire Appropriateness and Progress | Well-chosen repertoire with strong progress | Good progress toward recital aims | Developing repertoire with progress | Basic repertoire with minimal development | Poor progress or unsuitable repertoire |
Performance Communication | Confident, communicative, and stylistically aware | Generally confident and appropriate | Some audience connection | Tentative or limited engagement | Disconnected or unprofessional delivery |
Recital Criteria | HD | D | C | P | N |
Technical Mastery | Consistently strong technique and control | Good technique with occasional issues | Generally secure with some gaps | Functional technique with some limitations | Serious technical limitations |
Interpretive, Expressive, and Improvisational Insight (as appropriate) | Developed interpretive depth and stylistic clarity | Expressive and stylistically informed | Some expressiveness and understanding | Basic interpretation and limited risk | Lacks expressive or stylistic intent |
Stylistic and Repertoire Cohesion | Cohesive and stylistically aligned program | Mostly suitable and consistent | Generally appropriate | Inconsistent or underdeveloped cohesion | Inappropriate or incoherent repertoire |
Stage Presence and Professionalism | Confident, polished, and professional | Mostly confident and appropriate | Developing professionalism | Inconsistent or underprepared | Poor stage presence |
Program Notes (~600 words) | Thoughtful, clearly written and well-contextualised | Clear with good contextual detail | Adequate content with minor lapses | Basic or underdeveloped content | Incomplete or unclear notes |
Academic Integrity
Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.
The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.
The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.
The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.
Online Submission
You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.
Hardcopy Submission
For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.
Late Submission
Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below (see individual assessment descriptions for details):
- Late submission of live performance assessments are not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
- Late submission of written and presentation assessments are permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.
Referencing Requirements
The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material. Any use of artificial intelligence must be properly referenced. Failure to properly cite use of Generative AI will be considered a breach of academic integrity.
Extensions and Penalties
Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.
Privacy Notice
The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.
Distribution of grades policy
Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.
Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.
Support for students
The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).
- ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
- ANU Accessibility for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
- ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
- ANU Academic Skills supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
- ANU Counselling promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
- ANUSA supports and represents all ANU students
Convener
![]() |
|
|||
Research InterestsVocal pedagogy, voice science, biopsychosocial theory, gender and jazz, improvisation, self-efficacy, motor learning theory, music and psychology |
Dr Rachael Thoms
![]() |
|
Instructor
![]() |
|
|||
Research Interests |
Dr Gregory Stott
![]() |
|