• Class Number 4018
  • Term Code 3530
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 units
  • Topic Fashioning with Print
  • Mode of Delivery In Person
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • Dr Anna Madeleine Raupach
  • LECTURER
    • Dr Deidre Brollo
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 17/02/2025
  • Class End Date 23/05/2025
  • Census Date 31/03/2025
  • Last Date to Enrol 24/02/2025
SELT Survey Results

In this course students extend their technical and theoretical skills in planographic printing (screenprinting and lithography) via set projects and conceptual prompts. Students apply these skills to critically examine printmedia's key position in contemporary art. Studio projects explore the material possibilities of print, through colour, halftone and autographic mark making. In so doing, students can connect histories of print to specific visual effects and form. By reflecting on and experimenting with these forms and lineages, students will create work that uses print in context and dialogue with contemporary art.


Students may complete this course twice for a maximum credit value of 12 units, provided they enrol in a different topic in each instance/semester. Please note that the course content, assessment structure, and reading list will change depending on the topic and the expertise of the lecturer convening the course. Please refer to the class summary for the specific term in which you wish to enrol for a detailed description.

 

Topics may include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Fashioning with Print

This course explores the role of printmaking (screenprinting and/or lithography) in contemporary practice. Technical and conceptual skills developed in ARTV1751 will be extended by critically engaging with print operations specific to chosen mediums and in context to print histories of transmission, amplification and reproduction. Through studio investigations, lectures and group discussion, students will fashion printed works which critically and creatively engage with processes that connect and underpin contemporary visual culture.

  • Proliferation in Print

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

  1. demonstrate competency with a range of advancing technical skills in relation to studio area & contemporary art practice; 
  2. independently explore the potential of material/s & methods relevant to the studio area and set projects; 
  3. recognise and analyse precedents and influences on artistic practice; and 
  4. evaluate chosen studio methodologies on the outcomes of studio projects. 

Research-Led Teaching

Dr Deidre Brollo’s research and practice seeks to situate printmaking within the broader historical and social frameworks of print culture. In doing so, it seeks to interrogate the print with reference to its logic, agency and operations.

This focus on the agency of the printed image (and the technology that produces and reproduces it) provides a means to investigate the vernaculars of mark-making that are specific to print, and to explore how these print languages can be understood and employed within contemporary art practice.

Field Trips

Occasional field trips may be scheduled throughout the semester.

Additional Course Costs

Student contribution amounts under the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (HESA) and tuition fees support the course described in the Class Summary and include tuition, teaching materials, and student access to the workshops for the stated course hours.

The Material Fee is payable to the School of Art & Design to supply consumables and materials that become your physical property. The Additional Materials Fee is payable for materials you use in

addition to those supplied as part of the course. You can purchase additional material from the Workshop and take advantage of the GST-free status. These materials are also WHS and workshop process compliant.

Students have the option to obtain After hours Access to workshop and studio spaces outside of class delivery. After hours access is defined as access to workshop and studio spaces outside of business hours between 6.00pm and 10:00pm Monday to Friday and 9am – 4pm Saturday - Sunday. It is afforded to students by paying an After hours Access Fee each semester.

For further information and to Pay Materials and Access Fees go to: https://soad.cass.anu.edu.au/required-resources-and-incidental-fees  

Examination Material or equipment

Studio work and accompanying documentation is assessed during and at the end of the semester (see assessment due dates). In addition to the physical presentation of the work students may use a laptop or tablet to present supporting material. Please note that in the event of implementing Covid safe work practices, such as working from home, it may be necessary for student work to be documented and uploaded for assessment.

There are a variety of online platforms you will use to participate in your study program. These could include videos for lectures and other instruction, two-way video conferencing for interactive learning, email and other messaging tools for communication, interactive web apps for formative and collaborative activities, print and/or photo/scan for handwritten work and drawings, and home-based assessment.

ANU outlines recommended student system requirements to ensure you are able to participate fully in your learning. Other information is also available about the various Learning Platforms you may use.


Note: Students must have completed a Work Health and Safety induction and be approved by the Course Convenor in order to access specialist equipment and processes in the screen, lithography, book, relief and/or etching studios, outside class time.

Reading lists will be provided to students via Wattle. Articles and books will be available through the ANU libraries or as a PDF / link on wattle.

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

• Individual studio feedback

• Class discussion

• Group critique and review

• Wattle forum posts

• Assessment

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.

Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 SeminarCourse Introduction and WHS inductionDemonstration and studio practiceIntroduce Assessment Task 1

2 SeminarDemonstration and studio practiceIntroduce Assessment Task 2 Contributions to class activities contribute to demonstrating assessment task criteria.
3 Seminar
4 Demonstration and studio practice
5 Drill Hall collection visit - to be confirmed Due: Assessment Task 1
6 Panel DiscussionsIntroduce Assessment Task 3 Due: Assessment Task 2 Participation in panel discussions will contribute to your Assessment Task 2 and will provide useful insights and information for Assessment Task 3.
7 SeminarStudio Practice Due: Assessessment Task 2 written reflection
8 Studio practice
9 Group CritiqueStudio practice
10 Group CritiqueStudio practice
11 Group critiqueStudio practice
12 Group critiqueStudio practice
13 Examination period Due: Assessment Task 3

Tutorial Registration

N/A

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Due Date Return of assessment Learning Outcomes
Transmission 30 % 18/03/2025 01/04/2025 1,2,3
Research Project 20 % 25/03/2025 08/04/2025 2,4
Amplification & Reproduction 50 % 27/05/2025 26/06/2025 1,2,3,4

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

Participation in studio workshops are integral for completing the studio based assessment tasks for this course.

Examination(s)

Works to be installed in a physical presentation for studio-based assessment tasks.

Assessment Task 2 to be examined in both written and presentation formats.

Assessment Task 1

Value: 30 %
Due Date: 18/03/2025
Return of Assessment: 01/04/2025
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3

Transmission

In response to the project outline, students will develop and contribute a print to a class collaboration that explores alternative economies and value systems. Prints will be editioned so that each student will receive a full set of the collaborative currency. Support work including idea development, experimentation, contextual research and technical tests should be submitted.

Due: Week 5

Value: 30%

Rubric

CRITERIAHDDCPF

Skill in use of materials and techniques in printing (LO 1)

The student always demonstrates extensive skill/s in the introduced materials and techniques of printing

The student consistently demonstrates a high level of skill in the introduced materials and techniques of printing

The student demonstrates developing skills in the introduced materials and techniques of printing

The student show basic skill in the use of screen printing techniques and materials

Technical skills are below standard

Create a body of studio-based works/examples (LO 2)

The portfolio creatively combines material, process, idea and technique showing a sophisticated interpretation of the set project

The portfolio demonstrates an accomplished understanding of how materials, processes, ideas or techniques can be combined or used relevant to set project

The portfolio demonstrates a developing understanding of some

combinations or uses of material, process, idea or technique relevant to set project

The portfolio demonstrates basic understanding of materials, process and technique

Incomplete or flawed body of work

Developing understanding between concepts and techniques (LO 2, 3)

The student can clearly articulate and evaluate a range of concepts and how these relate to materials and techniques

The student can explain concepts and how these relate to materials and techniques

The student can explain introduced concepts and is developing an understanding of how these relate to materials and techniques

The student is developing an understanding of the relationship between introduced concepts and techniques

Concepts and techniques are not explained

Presentation/ installation of final works (LO 1, 2)

The presentation of this work is sophisticated and demonstrates a range of installation options have been tested and audience engagement has been carefully considered.

The presentation of the work shows thoughtful consideration shows of installation methods and audience engagement.

The presentation of the work shows adequate consideration of installation methods with some consideration of an audience.

The presentation of the work shows some consideration of installation methods.

The presentation of the work is not considered.

Assessment Task 2

Value: 20 %
Due Date: 25/03/2025
Return of Assessment: 08/04/2025
Learning Outcomes: 2,4

Research Project

Students will be assigned an artwork to research. A written response (500 words) that evaluates the work and reflects on its contextual framework will be submitted, then discussed in a panel format in class.

Panel presentation due: Week 6

Written response due: Week 7

Value: 20%

Rubric

CRITERIAHDDCPF

Identify and reflect on examples of how screen print is used in contemporary art

(LO 2, 4)

Artworks are analysed, evaluated and contextualised to inform a critical reflection

Artworks are analysed, evaluated and contextualised

Artworks are described rather than analysed to form basic reflections. There is limited understanding of the broader context

Artworks are described but not reflected on. An understanding of context is not demonstrated

The student does not identify or reflect on examples of artworks.

Research and reflect on relevant theoretical and philosophical framework (LO 4)

A range of relevant material including journal articles, essays, podcasts, interviews are referenced to build a comprehensive review of the topic

Relevant material including journal articles, essays, podcasts, interviews to explore the general topic

The student looks only to familiar sources for theoretical material. References are unrelated to the topic

The student is not familiar with relevant theoretical material. References are unrelated to the topic

There is no evidence of engagement with theoretical material

Explain research and articulate a position on a topic (LO 4)

The student clearly articulates their research in detail. Responses to questions indicate well-formulated positions on the topic

The student clearly articulates broad research. Responses to questions indicate thought out positions on the topic

The student can explain their research. Responses to questions indicate that a position on the topic is still developing

The student can speak about their research but explanations are unclear. Responses to questions indicate an unformed position on the topic

The presentation does not explain research

Use academic referencing where required (LO 4)

Academic referencing is used correctly

Academic referencing is used correctly

Academic referencing requires further attention to the style guide

Academic referencing is inconsistent

Academic referencing is not used

Assessment Task 3

Value: 50 %
Due Date: 27/05/2025
Return of Assessment: 26/06/2025
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4

Amplification & Reproduction

In response to the project outline, students will develop a resolved series of prints or variable edition. Final prints will be installed in the studio and distributed in a public location. The visual diary and research are key parts of this project and its development. Support work including idea development, experimentation, contextual research and technical tests should be submitted, along with a 100-word artist statement.

Value: 50%

Due date: Exam period

Rubric

CriteriaHDDCRPF

Skill in use of materials and techniques (LO 1)

The student always demonstrates extensive skill/s in the introduced materials and techniques of printing

The student consistently demonstrates a high level of skill in the introduced materials & techniques of printing

The student demonstrates developing skills in the introduced materials and techniques of printing

The student show basic skill in the use of screen printing techniques and materials

Technical skills are below standard

Plan and produce a body of studio-based works using planographic print (LO 2)

The student works independently to identify and research an original approach to the project brief. The portfolio creatively combines materials, techniques and ideas to achieve a sophisticated use of printing, where concept interweaves closely with process

The student works independently to identify a relevant approach to the project brief. The portfolio demonstrates an accomplished understanding of how materials, techniques and ideas can be combined when working with printing. The work effectively translates a concept through employed processes

The student relies on guidance to develop an appropriate approach to the project brief. The portfolio demonstrates a competent understanding of some

combinations of materials, techniques and ideas relevant to printing, that shows the student is developing a connection between concept and process

The student responds to the project brief without planning the aims, process or intended outcomes of the work. The portfolio demonstrates basic understanding of the materials, techniques and ideas relevant to printing. The work presents a concept that is unconnected to the processes employed

The student does not plan or produce an independent project

Engage with iteration and experimentation to investigate the potential of techniques

(LO 1, 2, 3)

Continuous testing, analysis, and repetition demonstrates thorough exploration of the process. Experimentation with different approaches informs decision making

Testing, analysis, and repetition demonstrates considered exploration of the process. Experimentation with different approaches is evident in decision making

There is minimal evidence of testing, analysis, or repetition to explore the process. A predefined idea rather than experimentation guides decision-making

There is no evidence of testing, analysis, or repetition to explore the process. The work presented is unresolved due to limited consideration of composition and a lack of experimentation

The student does not experiment to complete works

Reflect on screen print methods through independent research and studio practice (LO 2, 4)

The portfolio is informed by critical analysis and reflection on historical, theoretical, and contemporary contexts of printing

The portfolio is informed by consistent analysis and reflection on historical, theoretical, and contemporary contexts of printing

The portfolio adequately considers historical, theoretical, and contemporary contexts of printing

The portfolio includes basic references to historical, theoretical, and contemporary contexts of printing

There are insufficient connections between studio practice and historical, theoretical, and contemporary contexts of printing

Presentation/ installation of final works (1, 2)

The presentation of this work is sophisticated and demonstrates a range of installation options have been tested and audience engagement has been carefully considered.

The presentation of the work shows thoughtful consideration shows of installation methods and audience engagement.

The presentation of the work shows adequate consideration of installation methods with some consideration of an audience.

The presentation of the work shows some consideration of installation methods.

The presentation of the work is not considered.

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.


The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.


The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.

 

The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

All studio work and accompanying documentation is physically presented and assessed in the weeks indicated, except where otherwise stated (Oral Presentations). Please note that in the event of implementing Covid safe work practices such as working from home, it may be necessary for student work to be documented and uploaded for remote assessment.

Late Submission

Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:

  • Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material. Any use of artificial intelligence must be properly referenced. Failure to properly cite use of Generative AI will be considered a breach of academic integrity.

Returning Assignments

Students will take work with them following assessment.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Resubmission of Assignments

N/A

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

  • ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
  • ANU Accessibility for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
  • ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
  • ANU Academic Skills supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
  • ANU Counselling promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
  • ANUSA supports and represents all ANU students
Dr Anna Madeleine Raupach
Anna.raupach@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Media art, interdisciplinary practice.

Dr Anna Madeleine Raupach

Sunday 13:30 15:00
Dr Deidre Brollo
deidre.brollo@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Dr Deidre Brollo

By Appointment

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions