• Class Number 4264
  • Term Code 3430
  • Class Info
  • Unit Value 6 units
  • Mode of Delivery In Person
  • COURSE CONVENER
    • Dr Annie Ren
  • LECTURER
    • Dr Annie Ren
  • Class Dates
  • Class Start Date 19/02/2024
  • Class End Date 24/05/2024
  • Census Date 05/04/2024
  • Last Date to Enrol 26/02/2024
SELT Survey Results

This course introduces students to diverse concepts of literature from a number of traditions from the Asian and Pacific region. The materials range from ancient to contemporary texts, which will all be presented in accessible English translation. Works studied will vary from year to year, and may include such forms as oracle bones, religious narratives, poetry, puppet theatre, classic novels, oral storytelling, folk tales and/or recent fiction, among others. Students will have the opportunity to critically reflect on the similarities and differences between literary forms from the Asian and Pacific region and European categories, such as the novel, poem, or epic. The course examines how and why literary forms have been significant within different Asian or Pacific societies and considers what it means to translate such literary works across language, history and culture. The course further explores aspects of the social and literary environments that have shaped the production and interpretation of literary texts in historical and contemporary cultures, and considers the impact of a writer's nationality, cultural background, gender, social class and historical situation on the shaping of a work of literature.

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

  1. Describe how practitioners of literary studies have approached the study of the Asian and Pacific region;
  2. Demonstrate an understanding of the breadth, diversity and significance of literary forms within the Asian and Pacific region;
  3. Apply concepts and analytical tools from literary studies in ways that demonstrate critical thinking;
  4. Interpret primary sources in the context of scholarly debates and relevant intellectual traditions;
  5. Evaluate how the study of the Asian and Pacific region has influenced, and might influence, global literary studies;
  6. Communicate complex ideas in writing, speech, and/or multimedia, justifying methods and approaches as appropriate, individually and/or collaboratively.

Required Resources

See Wattle

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:
  • Written comments
  • Verbal comments
  • Feedback to the whole class, to groups, to individuals, focus groups

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). The feedback given in these surveys is anonymous and provides the Colleges, University Education Committee and Academic Board with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement. The Surveys and Evaluation website provides more information on student surveys at ANU and reports on the feedback provided on ANU courses.

Class Schedule

Week/Session Summary of Activities Assessment
1 Oracle Bones: Signs, Script and Birth of Literature 
2 What is Literature? A Confucian View (Dr Mark Strange)
3 Dreaming of Butterflies: Daoist Storytelling Tutorial presentation (group work)
4 Tales of Redemption and Enlightenment: Buddhist storytelling (Dr McComas Taylor) Tutorial presentation (group work)
5 Poetic Traditions: Chinese and Hindi (Dr Chris Diamond) Tutorial presentation (group work)
6 The World of the Shining Prince – Tale of Genji Tutorial presentation (group work)
7 The Cultural World of the Bannerman – Dream of the Red Chamber Tutorial presentation (group work)
8 War and literature (Dr Ruth Barraclough) Tutorial presentation (group work)
9 Workers’ literature (Dr Ying Xin Show) Tutorial presentation (group work)
10 Ghost stories (TBC) Tutorial presentation (group work)
11 Oceanic oral narratives (Dr Nick Evans) Tutorial presentation (group work)
12 Conclusions: What is Literature? Asian PerspectivesBoys Love Fiction (TBC) Reading Response 2 due

Tutorial Registration

Signup via wattle.

Assessment Summary

Assessment task Value Due Date Learning Outcomes
Tutorial Participation 10 % * 1,2,3,4,5,6
Tutorial Presentation 20 % * 2,3,6
Tutorial Reading Responses 30 % * 1,2,3,4
Final essay/unessay 40 % 31/05/2024 1,2,3,4,5,6

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines, which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Misconduct Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the ANU Online website Students may choose not to submit assessment items through Turnitin. In this instance you will be required to submit, alongside the assessment item itself, hard copies of all references included in the assessment item.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

Participation is an important part of the course.

Assessment Task 1

Value: 10 %
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5,6

Tutorial Participation

  • Active engagement with tutorial discussion questions. 
  • NOTE: it is hard to participate if you do not attend class.


Assessment Task 2

Value: 20 %
Learning Outcomes: 2,3,6

Tutorial Presentation

  • The goal of this assessment task is to encourage students to develop presentation and critical thinking skills.
  • Students are encouraged to form groups and take turn to present in weekly tutorials and lead weekly tutorial discussions.
  • Presentations must be based on one or two of the weekly texts and must include one focus point of critical analysis.
  • Feedback will be returned within a week after presentation. 


Rubric

Grade Use of supporting materialsExpression & TimingVolume and clarity of expressionDelivery & Audience engagementContent

HD

Visual aids and other supporting materials are of exceptional quality. They are used in a highly sophisticated and appropriate manner, greatly enhancing all elements of the presentation.

The presentation exhibits all the following qualities; appropriate volume, confident expression, well-timed, engaging.

The presentation is very well pitched, with the presenter's expression and delivery greatly enhance the overall quality of their presentation.

The presentation is confidently delivered, indicating that extensive effort has gone into preparing the presentation. Specific and sophisticated presentation techniques have been introduced to increase audience engagement.

A sophisticated and in depth understanding of the content is demonstrated that extends beyond expected information to introduce new and compelling ideas.

D

Visual aids and other supporting materials are of good quality and used in an appropriate manner, enhancing all elements of the presentation.

The presentation exhibits all the qualities of a High Distinction with one of the following: inappropriate volume at times, lack of confidence in expression, marginally over or under time limit, inconsistent engagement with the audience.

The presentation is clear and well-pitched with emphasis and expression that enhances the overall quality of their presentation.

The presentation is comfortably delivered, indicating a good level of preparation. Some specific attempts have been made to engage the audience that go beyond basic techniques.

An advanced understanding of the content is demonstrated, including attempts to introduce new and compelling ideas.

C

Most visual aids and other supporting materials are of satisfactory quality and used appropriately to support the presentation. Some may be difficult to interpret or somewhat irrelevant.

The presentation exhibits more than of the following: inappropriate volume at times, lack of confidence in expression, marginally over or under time limit, inconsistent engagement with the audience.

The presentation is clear and easy to understand. Appropriate expression for an oral presentation is employed.

The presentation is well delivered with some preparation evident. Sound presentation technique ensures adequate audience engagement and help communicate the key content.

A sound understanding of the content is demonstrated through an appropriate structure and organisation. Some extension on basic understanding of the content is evident.

P

Most visual aids and other supporting materials are satisfactory, with some lacking quality, relevance or clarity. They also may be relied on more than necessary, but still support the presentation adequately without being distracting to the viewer.

The presentation exhibits some or many of the following qualities: inappropriate volume at times, lack of confidence in expression, marginally over or under time, inconsistent engagement with the audience.

The presentation is mainly clear and with some errors in parts which do not greatly affect meaning or understanding.

The presentation is satisfactorily delivered, however, a lack of confidence at times affects audience engagement. Adequate delivery ensures that this does not significantly detract the quality of the overall presentation.

A satisfactory understanding of the content is demonstrated through a generally appropriate structure and organisation. Some information may be irrelevant or difficult to follow.

N

Visual aids and other supporting materials are overused, of poor quality, irrelevant and/or unclear, and/or distracting to the viewer, detracting from the quality of the presentation.

The presentation exhibits one or more of the following qualities: inappropriate volume throughout, difficulty understanding, considerably over or under time, poor or no engagement with the audience.

The presentation is difficult to understand, with inappropriate words and expression for an oral presentation plaguing the intended meaning.

The presentation is not satisfactorily delivered, showing a lack of preparation and conviction. This detracted significantly from the engagement with the audience.

Little or no understanding of the content is demonstrated. The structure and organisation of content may be confusing, or much of the information may be irrelevant or difficult to follow.

Assessment Task 3

Value: 30 %
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4

Tutorial Reading Responses

2 X 1000 words Tutorial Reading Response (15% each)

Due Friday, April 3; Friday, May 24.

LENGTH: 2000 words


  • The goal of this assessment task is to encourage students to critically engage with the course materials and to present and defend their own ideas, with a view to further developing the skills needed in the essay writing.
  • Students are expected to engage in critical reflection, articulate questions, confront bias, examine causality, contrast theory with practice and identify systemic issues all of which helps foster critical evaluation and knowledge transfer.
  • The tutorial reading responses are TWO 1000-word responses to TWO of the week’s Tutorial Discussion Questions. Note that quotes are not included in the world count.  
  • One Tutorial Reading Response must be submitted in Weeks 1-6 and the other in Weeks 7-12.
  • Each response is worth 15%.
  • Tutorial responses MUST cover a different week’s material to the tutorial presentation.
  • Students may choose which 2 tutorial reading responses to submit. More than two can be submitted and then the best two results will be selected.



Rubric

Grade Reflection on existing knowledge Evidence of development and authenticity Use of textual evidence and its historical contextStyle and structure

HD

Critically reviews existing knowledge, questions assumptions, and articulates new perspectives as a result of experience.

Articulates transformation of their perspective of themselves or about a particular issue/concept/ problem as a result of experience. Demonstrates a high level of personal reflection, communicating genuine and honest learning.

Use specific and convincing examples from the texts studied to support claims, making insightful and applicable connections between texts. Shows a solid understanding of the historical context.

Consistently clear and appropriate structure, including all required sections, elements and information.

D

Active and careful consideration of existing knowledge and articulates new understanding of knowledge as a result of experience.

Articulates new understanding/insights about self or particular issue/concept/ problem as a result of experience. Communicates learning with a degree of genuineness and honesty.

Use relevant examples from the texts studied to support claims making applicable connections between texts. Shows a sound understanding of the historical context.

Mostly clear and appropriate structure, including all required sections, elements and information.

C

Demonstrates some attempt at questioning assumptions and articulating new perspectives. Shows understanding but may lack depth or consistency.

Shows some articulation of new insights or understanding resulting from the experience. Shows a moderate level of personal reflection and engagement with the experience.

Use examples from the text to support most claims with some connections made between texts. Establish some understanding between historical context and the text(s).

Generally clear and appropriate structure that includes all required sections, elements and information.

P

Makes use of existing knowledge without an attempt to evaluate/appraise knowledge; demonstrates understanding but does not relate to other experiences or personal reaction.

Limited/superficial insight about self or particular issue/concept/ problem as a result of experience. Reflects a minimal or superficial level of personal reflection and engagement with the experience.

Use incomplete or vaguely developed examples to only partially support claims with no connections made between texts. Display superficial understanding of the historical setting of the text.

Somewhat clear and appropriate structure that includes all required sections and elements.

N

Automatic/superficial responses with little conscious/deliberate thought or reference to existing knowledge; responses are offered without attempting to understand them.

No evidence of insights about self or particular issue/concept/ problem as a result of experience. Lacks a genuine and honest communication of learning.

No examples from the text are used and claims made in your own writing are unsupported and irrelevant to the topic at hand. Failure to make meaningful connections between the text and its historical setting.

Lack of clear structure, or structure is not appropriate to the task. Some or all required sections and elements of the task may be incomplete or missing.

Assessment Task 4

Value: 40 %
Due Date: 31/05/2024
Learning Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5,6

Final essay/unessay

Essay or Unessay 30%

Due Friday, May 31.

LENGTH: 2000 words or equivalent

  • Marked Analysis Return: Friday, June 27. 
  • Tutorial Time will be given to discussing the format and topics of essay or unessay.
  • An essay will be evaluated on the quality of its research component, critical analysis, structure and format & writing style
  • An unessay will be evaluated on the quality of its research component, interpretation, communication and creativity.
  • Textual quotes are not included in the word count. 

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of our culture as a community of scholars. At its heart, academic integrity is about behaving ethically. This means that all members of the community commit to honest and responsible scholarly practice and to upholding these values with respect and fairness. The Australian National University commits to embedding the values of academic integrity in our teaching and learning. We ensure that all members of our community understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. The ANU expects staff and students to uphold high standards of academic integrity and act ethically and honestly, to ensure the quality and value of the qualification that you will graduate with. The University has policies and procedures in place to promote academic integrity and manage academic misconduct. Visit the following Academic honesty & plagiarism website for more information about academic integrity and what the ANU considers academic misconduct. The ANU offers a number of services to assist students with their assignments, examinations, and other learning activities. The Academic Skills and Learning Centre offers a number of workshops and seminars that you may find useful for your studies.

Online Submission

The ANU uses Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. While the use of Turnitin is not mandatory, the ANU highly recommends Turnitin is used by both teaching staff and students. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the ANU Online website.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

Accepted academic practice for referencing sources that you use in presentations can be found via the links on the Wattle site, under the file named “ANU and College Policies, Program Information, Student Support Services and Assessment”. Alternatively, you can seek help through the Students Learning Development website.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure The Course Convener may grant extensions for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information. In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service — including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy. If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes. Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

Dr Annie Ren
0432807015
<p>annie.ren@anu.edu.au</p>

Research Interests


Dr Annie Ren

Tuesday By Appointment
By Appointment
Dr Annie Ren
0432807015
annie.ren@anu.edu.au

Research Interests


Dr Annie Ren

Tuesday By Appointment
By Appointment

Responsible Officer: Registrar, Student Administration / Page Contact: Website Administrator / Frequently Asked Questions