In this course students will work closely with Canberra-based, national or international institutions to devise and deliver a public program.  By engaging directly with cultural industry leaders, students will learn how concepts such as audience, community and place-making are configured differently depending on the institutional context. The public program – be it a workshop, community project, participatory artwork or site-specific engagement – becomes a practice-led means to navigate ranging objectives in the larger arts and culture ecology. Contributing their existing skills, students will learn to problem solve and evaluate their methods as individual practitioners and collaborative producers. 

Students may complete this course twice for a maximum credit value of 12 units, provided they enrol in a different topic in each instance/semester. Please note that the course content, assessment structure, partner institutions and reading list will change depending on the topic and the expertise of the lecturer convening the course. Please refer to the class summary for the specific term in which you wish to enrol for a detailed description.

 

Topics may include, but are not limited to, the following:

• Canberra Communities: placemaking & cultural development
• Mt Stromlo Canberra Enlighten Project

Run in intensive mode, this project enables students to produce work for Canberra’s Enlighten Festival, for public premiere at Mount Stromlo Observatory in February 2025. The project offers the opportunity to explore the expressive potential of large-scale digital projections onto public architecture, taking into consideration the unique qualities of the Mount Stromlo, the history of Canberra Enlighten, and the staging of large scale cultural events/public art. Open to students working across all mediums and forms, the project offers the opportunity to extend your practice by exploring the expressive possibilities of the moving image in relation to traditional media.   

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

1. demonstrate social responsibility in engaging collaboratively with institutions, the public and peers  
2. develop informed methodologies and problem-solving skills in response to real-world problems and challenges. 
3. recognise and analyse practices of public programming from artistic, institutional and community perspectives; and
4. critically reflect on methods and outcomes.

Research-Led Teaching

This project emerges from a number of strands of ANU research excellence, developing expertise in art-science collaboration, science communication and public cultural programming. The course will include guest lecturers from leading researchers from astronomy and visual arts as well as leading practitioners in public projection, and is taught by staff in SOAD's Computational Culture Lab.

Field Trips

This course will involve approximately 3 visits to ANU's Mount Stromlo Observatory: https://rsaa.anu.edu.au/observatories/mount-stromlo-observatory

The campus is not accessible by public transport, and transport to and from the campus may be supported by car pooling.

Additional Course Costs

Artists' moving image is a hybrid practice, and can incorporate traditional media such as analogue photography, printmaking, drawing, painting, stop motion animation, text and other forms. Depending on the project, access to specialist workshop equipment may be negotiated, and may incur workshop fees if there is a material cost.

Required Resources

All students will be required to bring a portable hard drive or USB stick to backup any work on

Recommended Resources

Whether you are on campus or studying online, there are a variety of online platforms you will use to participate in your study program. These could include videos for lectures and other instruction, two-way video conferencing for interactive learning, email and other messaging tools for communication, interactive web apps for formative and collaborative activities, print and/or photo/scan for handwritten work and drawings, and home-based assessment.

ANU outlines recommended student system requirements to ensure you are able to participate fully in your learning. Other information is also available about the various Learning Platforms you may use.

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

• written comments
• verbal comments
• feedback to whole class, groups, individuals, focus group etc

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.

Other Information

Run in intensive mode, this project enables students to produce work for Canberra’s Enlighten Festival, for public premiere at Mount Stromlo Observatory in February 2025. The project offers the opportunity to explore the expressive potential of large-scale digital projections onto public architecture, taking into consideration the unique qualities of the Mount Stromlo, the history of Canberra Enlighten, and the staging of large scale cultural events/public art. Open to students working across all mediums and forms, the project offers the opportunity to extend your practice by putting your existing skills in dialogue with the expressive possibilities of the moving image.    

The intensive will be divided into 4 phases:   

1. Independent Study and Pre-Production: You will receive a pack with a set of materials to read and activities to complete to prepare for the intensive. 
2. Intensive Class Contact Time: 10-5pm daily from Monday 3rd February – Friday 7th February. Then 10 – 1pm on 10th, 11th and 14th February.  
3. Project Premiere: Enlighten, 28 February 2025. Project Rehearsal, 26 February (evening).
4. Critical Reflection: final assessment due 11th March 2025. 

 

Please note: The delivery of this summer intensive largely occurs prior to Semester 1. However, due to the timing of Enlighten Festival, the deadline for assessment of tasks 2 and 3 overlap with Semester 1. Because of this overlap, students who are enrolled in a full load in Semester 1 2025  will need to apply for overloading. 

Class Schedule

Week/Session	Summary of Activities	Assessment
1	Week 1, Day 1 Monday 2nd February, 10 -5pm: Course introduction, Moving Image workshop, Draft Proposal session	Participants will be given a pre-intensive study pack containing a set of reflective tasks and required readings to work through as pre-production preparation prior to the start of the intensive.
2	Week 1, Day 2 Tuesday 3rd February, 10 -5pm: Mt Stromlo Observatory site visit: tour and research
3	Week 1, Day 3 Wednesday 4th February, 10-5pm: Technical skills workshops and Production Research
4	Week 1, Day 4 Thursday 5th February, 10 -5pm: Presentation of Developed Proposals, skills development activity.	Assessment Task 1 - Project Development due (30%)
5	Week 1, Day 5 Friday 6th February, 10 -5pm: Feedback and discussion, tutorials and supervised production time	CENSUS DATE FOR COURSE
6	Week 2, Day 1 Monday 9th February, 10-2pm: Supervised production timeAfternoon: Independent Study/Production Time
7	Week 2, Day 2 Tuesday 10th February, 10-1pm: Critique session: screening and discussionAfternoon: Independent Study/Production Time
8	Week 2, Day 3 Wednesday 11th February: No class. Independent study/Production time
9	Week 2, Day 4 Thursday 12th February: No class. Independent study/Production time
10	Week 2, Day 5 Friday 13th February 10 - 1pm: Presentation of Work in Progress & Formative Assessment, Task 2.	Assessment Task 2, Formative Assessment
11	February 16th - 20th: ANU O-Week.Independent production time and tutorials by appointment.Thursday 19th February, 7:30pm–10pm: Install / Dress rehearsals. All students on site at Mt Stromlo for testing and dress rehearsal of projection work.	Tutors will schedule a 1:1 tutorial with you to check in on your progress this week, and help you with any problems.Attendance is expected at dress rehearsal (19th Feb) and is assessed as part of your participation.
12	Week 1, Semester 1Monday 23rd February: Submission of Assessment Task 2 to Canvase by 12pm.Friday 27th February, evening: All students on site at Mt Stromlo for Enlighten project launch and public event. Projections also shown Saturday 28th February.	Assessment Task 2 - Project Realisation due (50%) Monday 23rd FebruaryAttendance is expected at Project launch (27th Feb) and is assessed as part of your participation.Contributions to volunteering at Enlighten (27-28th Feb) is expected and assessed as part of your participation.
13	Week 2, Semester 1Enlighten continues: Friday 6th - Saturday 7th March.	Contributions to volunteering at Enlighten (6-7th March) is expected and assessed as part of your participation.
14	Week 3, Semester 1	Friday 13th March, 11:59pm Assessment Task 3 - Critical Reflection due to Canvas (20%)

Tutorial Registration

Tutorial Registration not required

Assessment Summary

Assessment task	Value	Due Date	Learning Outcomes
Mount Stromlo Project Proposal and Development	30 %	05/02/2026	1, 2, 3
Mt Stromlo Project Delivery	50 %	23/02/2026	1, 2, 3
Mount Stromlo Project Critical Reflection	20 %	13/03/2026	1, 2, 3, 4

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

• Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
• Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure
• Extenuating Circumstances Application
• Student Surveys and Evaluations
• Deferred Examinations
• Student Complaint Resolution Policy and Procedure
• Code of practice for teaching and learning

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Wattle’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

Participation is assessed as part of this course, and contributed10% of your mark for Task 2. Please commit to building the skills to provide your peers with well considered feedback, and ensure you have blocked out the required time to attend the dress rehearsal and launch on Wednesday 19th February and 27th February respectively. Be a good listener, and come prepared. Whilst conversations need to be rigorous and opinions are very welcome, each contribution needs to be respectful and thoughtfully delivered. Professionalism and good communication with your tutors about your attendance is expected.

Assessment Task 1

Mount Stromlo Project Proposal and Development

Value: 30%

The first assessment focuses on the research and development of a moving image artwork, developed individually, negotiated in dialogue with your tutors, to be projected at Mount Stromlo Observatory as part of Canberra Enlighten Festival 2026.

Prior to the start of the start of intensive teaching (w/c 2nd February), you will be supplied with a professional information pack - much as you would in a real-world commissioning situation - containing a briefing document offering an extended overview of the Canberra Enlighten Festival, the concept for the 2025 festival, and the history and context of Mount Stromlo. In addition, the pack will contain supplementary resources including readings and artworks to view to help you prepare for the intensive and support the generation of ideas for your project.

Based on the above, you are required to submit the following:

1) a 1500 word written proposal describing your approach to the brief and

2) practical work you have undertaken to test and visualise your approach: for example preparatory drawings, photographs, storyboards, modelling, treatment.

Further advice on how to approach the submission will be published on Canvas and in class.

Formative Assessment Deadline: Draft proposal to be prepared for feedback and review, Monday 2nd February at 3pm in class.

Summative Assessment Deadline: Full proposal due, Thursday 5th February at 10am on Canvas and in class.

Rubric

Criteria	HD	D	CR	P	F
Project idea and Rationale LO 1, 2, 3, 4	The proposal represents sophisticated approach to the brief, reflecting an ambitious and engaging set of ideas that are well justified. A highly original response that integrates critical and contextual knowledge.	A strong, well-articulated central concept that reflects good experimentation and the potential to generate an aesthetically or critically engaging outcome. Thoughtful engagement with the brief.	Proposal presents a good central idea, that might lack some detail or be limited in its creative potential, reproducing existing conventions.	Proposal articulates a response to the brief, but it may be muddled or poorly aligned with the task.	Proposal lacks a coherent central idea; concept is underdeveloped, lacks clarity, or does not address the brief.
Underpinning research and contextual awareness LO 1, 2, 3	Extensive and highly relevant research is integrated seamlessly into the proposal, demonstrating critical awareness of historical and contemporary contexts.	Proposal reflects strong research skills, weaving in references to artists and concepts that significantly expand the context of the proposal. Critical awareness is evident.	Proposal is supported by some good contextual research, but may not stray far from references given in class.	Proposal reflects limited research and superficial contextual awareness, and may be poorly aligned with the task, drawing on poor quality sources.	Proposal is not supported by research or critical engagement with concepts, artists' practices and related methodologies. Minimal or no evidence of research or contextual awareness.
Visual materials and prototyping LO 1, 2, 3, 4	Highly compelling and well-crafted visual material. Demonstrates a sophisticated use of visual language to convey ideas clearly and effectively.	Strong visual material with clear communication of ideas. Evidence of care and attention to detail.	Effective visual material, though some aspects may lack clarity or refinement.	Basic visual material that communicates ideas but with noticeable gaps in clarity or execution.	Poorly presented visuals that fail to communicate the concept adequately.
Project planning LO 1, 2	Proposal offers a highly articulate and honest reflection of the anticipated challenges in translating ideas into practice, with a well-planned timeline and clear risk management.	Proposal offers a strong and realistic appraisal of the process and timeframe, identifying ways to mitigate anticipated problems.	Proposal identifies some risks, challenges and time management considerations, but may lack detail or honesty.	Limited reflection on the practical/logistical challenges of the project.	Proposal fails to reflect on production timeline and attendant risks.
Clarity and coherence of writing (including Chicago referencing) LO 2	Writing is exceptionally clear, coherent, and engaging. Ideas are articulated with precision, and the structure is logical and well-organised. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation are flawless. Meticulous referencing.	Writing is clear and well-structured, with minor issues in grammar, spelling, or punctuation that do not detract from overall quality, supported by careful referencing, almost no mistakes.	Writing is adequately clear and structured. Some grammar, spelling, or punctuation issues may affect readability. Good referencing, with a few mistakes.	Writing is basic and may lack clarity or coherence. Frequent grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present reflecting inadequate proof reading. Adequate referencing with mistakes and inconsistencies.	Writing is unclear, poorly structured, and/or riddled with errors that hinder understanding. Inadequate referencing.

Assessment Task 2

Mt Stromlo Project Delivery

Value: 50%

The second assessment task focuses on the realisation of your proposal: the development and delivery of a moving image work to be premiered (alongside your peers) at Canberra Enlighten 2025 on 27th February 2026. The length and scope of the work will be negotiated with your tutors during proposal development, as this will depend on what techniques and methods you adopt, and what part of the Mt Stromlo site you project onto. 10% of the mark for Task 2 will be based on your participation and engagement in the project delivery, namely: your attendance and contribution to the project launch on the evening of 27th February, and the dress rehearsal and install on the evening of Thursday 19th February.

Further advice on how to approach the submission, including file types and technical parameters will be published on Wattle.

Formative Assessment Deadline: 10am, Friday 13th Feb in class for feedback and review.

Summative Assessment Deadline: Monday 23rd February, 12pm - upload finished work to supplied link on Canvas

Rubric

Criteria	HD	D	CR	P	F
Creative approach to commissioning brief LO 1, 2, 3	Highly imaginative, ambitious and/or experimental interpretation of brief, reflecting sophisticated understanding of its public/institutional context and materials.	The work reflects significant experimentation, supported by an engaging concept and strong visual imagery thoughtfully anchored to the site and brief.	A good interpretation of the brief, which may however reproduce highly conventional approaches to its subject or public context.	A highly literal interpretation of the brief, reflecting limited creative experimentation or understanding of its public/institutional context.	Little to no effort to interpret the brief or address its parameters.
Technical production and realisation LO 2	Highly technically polished and accomplished, the work reflects a critical attention to detail and problem solving skills resulting in work of a professional level.	The work reflects a confident mastery of its materials and processes, with few technical errors.	The project is completed to a good standard, however there may be errors and opportunities for improvement.	The project may may be let down by poor image capture, sequencing, output errors and may need to be fixed before public launch.	The project may not be complete, with little attempt to rectify technical problems. The work may not be presentable and may be excluded on this basis from exhibition.
Participation and engagement LO 1, 2, 3, 4	Generous and insightful participation. Asks pertinent questions and provides feedback with critical consideration. Invested in the success of the project and group. Outstanding professionalism.	Valuable participation. Asks interesting questions and provides quality feedback to peers. Excellent professionalism.	Notable participation, that may be inconsistent. Shows engagement through examples. Asks questions and attempts thoughtful feedback.	Some participation. Professionalism may be hampered by poor communication with tutors and peers. Opportunity to listen more actively when engage with peers/external collaborators.	Limited to no participation. Unexplained absences, or unexplained withdrawal from class activities reflecting a lack of professionalism and engagement.

Assessment Task 3

Mount Stromlo Project Critical Reflection

Value: 20%

Word Count: 1500

Drawing on the lectures, seminars, site visits and class discussions, you are required to submit a critical reflection on the final public project at Mount Stromlo. Your critical reflection should include an analysis of the production process, including any challenges you faced, and your evaluation of the final project. The essay should include a bibliography formatted in Chicago style, and documentation where appropriate.

Further detailed advice on how to approach the submission will be published on Wattle.

Deadline: 13th March 2026, 11:59pm to link on Wattle

Rubric

Criteria	HD	D	CR	P	F
Critical engagement with the project and its public outcomes LO 1, 2, 3, 4	Demonstrates exceptional insight into the project’s conceptual and practical dimensions, articulating complex and original reflections on decisions, challenges, and successes. Analysis is thoughtful, critical, and supported by relevant examples from the project.	Provides a strong, well-articulated analysis of the project’s conceptual and practical dimensions. Offers critical reflections and thoughtful engagement with decisions and challenges, supported by relevant examples.	Presents a solid analysis of the project with clear reflections on its conceptual and practical aspects. Some critical engagement is evident, though insights may lack depth or nuance.	Addresses the project’s key aspects with basic reflection on decisions and outcomes. Limited critical engagement or depth.	Superficial or descriptive discussion of the project with little to no critical engagement or reflection.
Contextual awareness LO 1, 2, 3, 4	Insightfully situates the project within broader artistic, historic, cultural, and theoretical contexts, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of its relevance and implications. Connections are well-articulated and nuanced.	Effectively contextualises the project within relevant artistic, cultural, historic or theoretical frameworks. Connections are clear and meaningful.	Provides adequate contextualisation, with some relevant connections to artistic, cultural, historical or theoretical frameworks. Connections may lack depth or detail.	Offers basic contextualisation, with limited or superficial connections to broader frameworks of the course.	Fails to situate the project in a broader context or makes irrelevant or incorrect connections.
Reflection on creative process LO 2, 4	Offers a deeply reflective and nuanced account of the creative process, including challenges, learning moments, and decision-making. Demonstrates exceptional self-awareness and critical insight. Demonstrates exceptional engagement with feedback and a strong ability to critically evaluate and improve personal practice based on reflection.	Provides a thoughtful and reflective account of the creative process, discussing challenges and learning outcomes with clarity. Shows thoughtful engagement with feedback and evidence of applying it to improve practice.	Reflects adequately on the creative process, identifying challenges and learning moments, though insights may lack depth. Reflects adequately on feedback, with some evidence of applying it to practice.	Provides a basic reflection on the creative process, with limited discussion of challenges or learning outcomes. Limited engagement with feedback, with little evidence of self-improvement.	Offers little to no reflection on the creative process or fails to identify challenges or learning outcomes. No evidence of engagement with feedback or reflection on self-improvement.
Clarity and coherence of writing (including appropriate referencing) LO 2	Writing is exceptionally clear, coherent, and engaging. Ideas are articulated with precision, and the structure is logical and well-organised. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation are flawless. Meticulous referencing.	Writing is clear and well-structured, with minor issues in grammar, spelling, or punctuation that do not detract from overall quality, supported by careful referencing, almost no mistakes.	Writing is adequately clear and structured. Some grammar, spelling, or punctuation issues may affect readability. Good referencing, with a few mistakes.	Writing is basic and may lack clarity or coherence. Frequent grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present reflecting inadequate proof reading. Adequate referencing with mistakes and inconsistencies.	Writing is unclear, poorly structured, and/or riddled with errors that hinder understanding. Inadequate referencing.

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.

The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.

The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.

 

The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education) submission must be through Turnitin.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:

• Late submission not permitted [Task 2]. Submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
• Late submission permitted [Task 1 and 3]. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item. Late submission is not accepted for take-home examinations.

Referencing Requirements

The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material. Any use of artificial intelligence must be properly referenced. Failure to properly cite use of Generative AI will be considered a breach of academic integrity.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

• ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
• ANU Accessibility for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
• ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
• ANU Academic Skills supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
• ANU Counselling promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
• ANUSA supports and represents all ANU students